FoxNews wins the day with its campaign coverage during the 3Q of the year.

FOX News Channel Achieves Milestone by Delivering Its Most Watched Quarter Ever in Total Day Viewership

FNC Ranks #1 in Basic Cable in Q3 Primetime and Total Day Viewers
‘The O’Reilly Factor’ Tops Q3 Total Viewers; ‘The Kelly File’ Tops Q3 24-54 Demo
‘Hannity’ Leads Cable News 25-54 Demo in September While ‘The O’Reilly Factor’ Takes Number One in Total Viewers

Obviously,  Trump is the winner,  here.  Keep in mind that a little less than 30% of the network's demographic is "Democrat."  Are we looking at the popularity of Trump,  or only an extreme interest in the man?  We won't know the answer until November   ~ editor.

Text taken from The Business Wire, here. 

How did the Monday debate rate? A record but short of expectations.

Turns out that the Monday night debate failed to meet expectations while breaking the previous record for a national political debate,  In 1980,  the Carter/Reagan debate took in 80 million viewers.  Monday night's debate took in 81 million folks,  far less than the predicted 90 to 100 million.  

You should, also, know that the Monday debate crushed the attendance record of the Mitt/Barack debate.  In that case,  a little over 67 million folks watched the first debate.

Trump won most if not all of the policy debate. Here is one example:

2003 clip backs up Trump on Iraq War opposition

Fox News 

Understand that had Lester Holt done his homework,  rather, than parrot is own poorly researched news lede,  he would have not injected himself into the debate.  Only 8% of the population has "great confidence" in the traditional network media.  This is gives another reason why the media has disqualified itself from the vetting process.   

Barack uses his position as president to defame and penalize a Trump supporter and successful businessman.

Brietbart and Midknight Review:  Palantir Technologies co-founder Peter Thiel, a [Trump] proposed nominee to the Supreme Court, is evidently paying the price for backing Republican nominee Donald Trump, as the Obama administration has slapped his company with a frivolous lawsuit alleging “racial discrimination” against Asians.
The lawsuit, filed and announced Monday by [Obama's] Department of Labor, threatens the complete cancellation of every contract Palantir has with the federal government — a penalty worth $340 million, the lawsuit claims, which would end the company.
The claims in the lawsuit are laughable. The Obama administration alleges that Palantir, a Donald Trump supporter,   discriminated against Asians. But it has to admit that Palantir, in fact, hired many Asians — 11 out of 25 software engineers, for example. The government does not even bother to claim that Palantir deliberately excluded Asians. Rather, it argues that since only 44% of Palantir’s software engineers are Asian, but 85% of the applicant pool was Asian, Palantir must, statistically, have discriminated against Asians.

Clearly,  the Obama administration,  one which has done nothing for the Asian community over the past eight years,  is simply trying to win an election by trashing a successful  innovator.  While Barack has no knowledge when it comes to creating a business opportunity for others,  no ability to write a balanced budget or manage a company,  still,  he injects himself into our private lives as if he matters.  The sad truth of this matter is this:  Barack is playing the bully in a partisan bid to defame and penalize those who cross his path.  

Of course the lawsuit will be defeated,  but,  in the meantime,  he is scoring points against Trump in similar fashion to his weaponization of the IRS during the 2012 election cycle.  

Did you forget about this fact when considering Trumps debate performance?

I am talking about the fact that it was his first time.  How did he do considering this was his first public one-on-one debate versus a woman who has had 40 plus public debates?  Did he blow up, lose his temper,  begin insulting and belittling Hiallary? Nope.  Did he stay on message?  Yep.  Nope. Did he talk over Hillary?  Not at all.  Did he "hold his own?"  Most will agree that he did.  He certainly did not revert to his primary standard.   Did he lose votes because of this performance?  Almost no one says "yes."  Did Hillary give Millennials any reason to vote for her in mass?  Nope.  Did she defend the illegality implicit with her email scandal? 

Hillary won the smear debate; Trump crushed her on policy. Its that simple. November will tell us who actually won the debate(s)

No one on this blog has ever believed in Trump's debate skills, but he held his own and . . . .

No one on this blog has ever believed in Trump's debate skills,  but he held his own, last night.  Understand this,  Hillary did not win the policy debate.  She only "won" on issues that prove Trump to be a blue collar type guy, guilty of poor conduct,  as if her own legion of lies,  her husbands predatory sexism and her willingness to indict all Americans of racism, including our local police force(s),  mean nothing and should not be part of the discussion.   

While Trump is a disaster when it comes to his many gaffs,  the point of last night's debate was to demonstrate that he is not the unhinged King of the World,  and he did that.  I personally do not believe he won a single primary debate based on pure substance.  Rather,  he "won" because he has taken sides with the common American man and woman,  and believes is a "Great American again."  While Hillary was busy,  last night,  talking about the disgusting trivia in Trump's life, she ignored her own malfeasance and disgusting behavior as a politician and leader.

For example: 

While Trump calls names,  Hillary gets people killed,  She supports Obama's Syrian policy and his lie about the "red line,"  decisions that have gotten 500,000 killed in Syria and turned 11 million folks in the Middle East into homeless refugees. While Trump is busy filing four Chapter Eleven bankruptcies, she is busy laundering millions through her foundation,  giving 5% of its revenues to charitable works while keeping the remaining 95% for herself and her staff.  While she claims to be a feminist,  she is busy supporting countries that practice honor killings,  death to gays, rape of young boys to age 12, female mutilations, and the subjugation of their female populations.     While Trump supports Israel, she is busy helping Iran establish its clandestine and long range nuclear war machine.- a nuclear armament effort that will,  someday,  be the end of Israel.   While Trump is calling certain women names,  she is busy destroying the dozen or so women who were sexually raped and/or molested by her husband.  While Trump wants to be the president of all the people,  she is busy defining half of America as deplorable and without redemption.   While Trump committed adultery with one woman,  she is busy living in as loveless a relationship as is known to mankind.  While accusing Trump of racism,  she is busy using the black vote to get elected,  then doing absolutely nothing for that constituency . . . . .   nothing.  She is as lawless as is Barack Obaama.  She no longer believes that our national sovereignty is worth enforcing border law and order.  She no longer believes our Constitution has authority over U.N. treatise and is a willing partner with the vandals and cop killers who follow Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan and the New Black Panthers around. 

I could go on,  but you get the drift.  Trump has his thousand sins,  Hillary has her 10,000.

Good news about the threat to "fact check" during hte debates.

In the world of politics,  there is absolutely nothing that is "non-partisan,"  including the function of "fact checking."  The push by the Clinton people to force the networks to take sides using the thinly veiled pretense of fact-checking,  is  as much a threat to the viewers as is an outright lie such as "you can keep your doctor, period," or "I did nothing with my emails that others before me had not done."  

In fact,  the very word "politics" is a permissive word allowing for deception and fraud,  and all of us who view politics with a critical eye know this to be true.  So let's stop pretending that politics is not about making fools out of the voters,  and pray that we wind up with an elected official who will keep us safe,  and allow us to go about our business as we see fit.  Hillary is opposed to this;  Trump seems to allow for our freedom.  

At any rate,  the networks have announced that they will not be fact checking during the debates.  End of problem   . . . . . .  we hope. 

Here is another noteworthy reason for voting in favor of Donald Trump. Enough of the current anti-Semitic Administration.

Barak Ravid / Haaretz: Trump Tells Netanyahu: If Elected, U.S. Would Recognize Undivided Jerusalem as Israel's Capital  —  Israel's Ambassador to the U.S. Ron Dermer and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner attended the 80-minute meeting at Trump

What is not made clear is this: the headline may be true because of the wide-spread disgust of the people for Central Governance. Time will tell, and, in short order.

Mike DeBonis / Washington Post:
Democratic hopes of winning Senate fade as Trump proves less toxic for Republicans  —  Democrats are now facing a tougher road to capturing the Senate majority as the presidential race tightens and Donald Trump is not proving to be the dramatic drag on down-ballot candidates that Republicans once feared.

This picture tells us all we need to know about the Bush Family politic . . . . . and to think I spent the last 16 years defending this phony!!!!!!

Turns out, the FBI "investigation" was a sham, designed to prevent the indictment of Hillary Clinton. Here are the critical facts "proving" this conclusion.

Bryon Pagliano,  Hillary's IT "guru," the single person who knew the most about setting up Clinton's illegal and totally private server,  was given full immunity from prosecution.  Understand that immunity is a legal protection offered by Obama's [in this case] Department of Justice.  It is not a product of the FBI.  At the time,  the people were led to believe that this DOJ offering (Pagliano's immunity deal)  was for the purpose of getting at the truth.  Turns out that the very opposite was the fact. 

What we did not know,  and were not told until after this crap investigation was "completed,"  was this:  at the time of Pagliano's offer of immunity from the Department of Justice,  Hillary's lawyer,  Heather Samuelson, State Department IT boss John Bental, and , Cheryl Mills, Hillary's personal lawyer,  were, also,  given immunity,  as well.  In other words,  there really wasn't anyone left to prosecute !  And all this happened nearly a year ago. 

More than this,  Hillary was not sworn in for her personal testimony to the FBI,  preventing prosecution for lying.  Again,  a shameless and undeniable effort at protecting her from any legal remedies to her crookedness.  Not only was she not sworn in,  no taping or video of the session was allowed,  no official record of any kind was taken, and,  Comey,  the head of the FBI did not attend the closed door session.  

If no one of import was left to prosecute,  if the FBI Director personally refused the swearing in of Hillary,  refused the recording of her testimony, or, even refused to attend Hillary;s  closed door session,  nothing remains for us Common Folks to do but to vote her into oblivion.  Me?  You all know how disappointed I was in the Trump campaign.  But now,  as of a week ago, and, the above revelations,  I would vote for Trump,  even if he were the Socialist One Worlder,  not Hillary.  

Now you know.  

Monday's debate witll break this record:

The 1980 debate between Carter and Reagan,  the only debate between the two men,  was viewed by 80 million folks.  Experts believe Monday night's debate will be seen by 100 million with 10 million folks (that's 10%) looking to be persuaded and willing to change their minds.  

We all know what Trump cannot do.  But Hillary?  What is her vulnerability?  How she presents herself.  Hillary simply is not an "inspirational speaker."  So,  what is her default mode?  One of seriousness and deeply felt concern.  Problem:  every point she makes sounds as though she is talking about the end of the world.  Her second major problem is her willingness to lie or hide from the truth.  It is pathological  (illness related).  A third issue is found in the fact that so many of us are sick and tired of dealing with the woman.  If none of these issues are amended,  she is going to have a difficult time come election day in November.  

Why Colin Kaepernick means nothing to the problems he protests and the solutions that must follow.

In making his protest,  Kaepernick has aligned himself with those symbols that represent a certain hatred for the United States and its white population.  

1.  Raised black fists is a symbol of hatred for the nation and the perception that it was built around the slave trade and continues to be an oppressive/racist.

2.  Black Lives Matters is a dynamic and approved partner of the Kaepernick movement .  When you understand that BLM is more of a white-hate organization, today,  than it was in its Furgeson beginnings, you understand why Kaepernick's protest cannot produce real solutions.  As an example,  we have the riots in Charlotte.  Such has devolved into a white-hating disaster, despite the fact that a black cop was the shooter.  
You should know that the Angry Black Movement wants the abolition of our local police forces,  and an open door policy when it comes to the imprisonment of the non-violent black criminal population.  

3,4,5.   Partners such as Barack Obama, Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan, committed raciests all,  is a collective that works against broad-based support, as well.   

Argue the point, if you will,  but three months from now,  it will be clear:  Kaepernick will be only a memory and the problems he protests will continue to be issues with which we must deal.

Here is what Hillary is not telling you about "deaths by gun fire."

Terrorism is part of it, but gun violence kills 33,000 Americans a year. … We’ve got to get serious about stemming violence and terrorism in every way we can  ~  Hillary. 

Turns out that 19,392 folks committed suicide.  Accidental deaths and gangland homicides account for another 11,000. 
Mass shootings (4 four or more deaths in a single event), domestic murder (often two or three murder victims),  death by cop and other causes,  account for the remaining 2400 deaths.  In other words,  solve the inner city gang problem and suicide by gun fire,  and we have 2,400 problematic events  . . . . .   not 33,000.  

Rally attendance translates into an enthusiasm marker. Guess who is winning that war?

This week is an abbreviated week of campaigning due to the coming debate on Monday.  Trump spoke to 26,000 folks inside his venues,  another 20,000 standing outside, while Hillary to spoke to 200 folks in a single rally.  Clearly,  the Right is energized while the Alt-Left is staying home. 

Take away 30% of the Millennial vote, 24% of the Black vote; 70% of the blue collar vote, poor turn-out and now, this, and you have a path to defeating Hillary.

The Hill is telling us this: 
Congressional Hispanic Democrats are questioning the party's approach to campaigning in Latino communities, as Republicans led by Donald Trump exceed expectations with the demographic.
The poor results reveal a rift between the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) and Democratic Party leadership over how to approach Latino voters.  Although Trump has alienated many Latino voters with his strong rhetoric on immigration and comments about Hispanics, his performance in polls has been roughly on par with 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney. A recent Bloomberg Politics average of polls found Hillary Clinton leads Trump by 38 points among Hispanics. Obama beat Romney by 44.

Rep. Tony Cárdenas (D-Calif.) chairman of the CHC's fundraising arm, Bold PAC, said many of the consultants hired by party leadership fail to fully understand the cultural nuances of the communities they're trying to approach.

Mark Cuban will be seated on front row of debate to intimidate Trump. Here is Trumps' response.

Mark Cuban will be seated on front row of debate to intimidate Trump.  Here is Trumps' response.

Trump Threatens to Seat Former Bill Clinton Mistress in Front Row at Debate

*UPDATE: She Accepts!

 I think he should seat all of Bill's women on front row.

Trump plans to finish ad campaign in a flurry, out-pacing Hillary's prejected ad buy.

Trump campaign plans $140 million ad buy that would outpace Clinton's ad reservations through Election Day

He will spend $100 mill on air-time ads,  and 40 mil on digital.  To date,  Trump's campaign has spent just $22 million for the same type ads versus Hillary's $125 million.  

The campaign will target 13 states.  The RNC will target the larger national audience.

Understand that Trump is in a virtual tie with Clinton despite the ad-buy disparity.  If a strong ad campaign makes a difference,  we should expect Trump's numbers to markedly improve. 

You already know that Cruz caved and endorsed Trump Here is what you may not know:

You already know that Cruz caved and endorsed Trump  Here is what you may not know:  he had no future in GOP presidential politics without this endorsement,  and,  was facing defeat in his 2016 senatorial campaign.  Apparently,  his biggest fan,  Glenn "Everybody is a Progressive" Beck,  didn't get the memo.   Beck will not go away,  but he has been effectively marginalized  . . . . . . . . forever.   So much for the politics of personal principles.  Hail the politic of saving the nation. 

Anyone see the contradiction in this headline? Apparently the Marxist Left doesn't.

The Mystery of Trump’s Man in Moscow

Reports of deep Russian ties swirl around Trump advisor Carter Page. Oddly, nobody in Russia seems to have heard of him.

How is it that "reports are swirling" when no one in Russia knows anything about the "reports?"   ~  editor.

Here is the video/audio of the Scott shooting. Upsetting to say the least, but, still, a couple of serious questions. See what you think.

I have more questions now that I have watched this video.  "Drop the gun" is a command given several times.  Why the command if there was no gun?  And what does the wife mean when she says,  "Keith,  don't do it" and makes that plea with a very certain sense of urgency.  

But,  before the cops surrounded Keith Scott,  what caused them to become so aggressive?  It does not appear to me that they could have seen a gun in the first minutes or seconds of this event.  

Clearly an investigation is in demand.  Let's all take a wait and see stance on this matter. 

Hillary wants to raise Estate Taxes from 40% to 65% But why? Seriously, what is she doing?

Hillary wants to raise Estate Taxes from 40% to 65%,  but why?  Seriously,  what is she doing?  Understand that this top rate applies to only 253 American taxpayers.  How so, you ask?  Because there are only 253 families that have estates worth more than 500 million dollars.  So, again,  I ask,  "Why is she making a proposal that has virtually zero impact on our debt or the national economy.?"  

Could it be that this is a shameless effort on the part of Hillary,  to cater to her anti-rich constituency (the Millennials),  while being seen as an implicit/stealth friend of the filthy rich? 

Keep in mind that, in real life,  she is at the epee-center of big money politics and a friend of the high dollar investor/donor class  (emphasis on "donor"). I mean,  you do not go from zero to 135 million dollars of net worth by being a member of the common class.  

How prepared should Trump be in the face of the coming debate?

What most do not know is this:  It is accepted knowledge that Reagan lost his first debate in 1984 [versus Mondale] because of "too many facts" and over preparation.     In subsequent debates,  he was much more personable and, as a result,  walked away with the debate aspect of the election cycle. 

Trump narrows his list of prospective Supreme Court justices . . . . . . and it is a good.

Senator Mike Lee (who has not yet endorsed Trump),  Neil Gorsuch, a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; Margaret A. Ryan, a judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces; Edward Mansfield, an Iowa Supreme Court justice; Keith Blackwell, a Georgia Supreme Court justice; Charles Canady, a Florida Supreme Court justice; Timothy Tymkovich, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; Amul Thapar, a U.S. District Court judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky; Federico Moreno, a U.S. District Court judge for the Southern District of Florida; and Robert Young, the chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court.

You should know that Trump’s decision earned praise from Judicial Crisis Network Director Carrie Severino, who clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas.

Hillary is losing the social media wars big time. Here are the numbers:

FoxNews gives us these numbers:  

Twitter:  11.7 million followers compared to 8.9 million, Trump versus Hillary. 
Facebook:  10.7 million followers for Trump  versus a paltry 6.6 million for Hillary.

Me?  I think this gives us more reason to believe that Hillary is in big big trouble with Millennials.More than this,  the Trump [adult] children reach 30 million folks on social media,  most are Millennials  . . . .   a huge advantage for the trump campaign.  

13 reasons why this election cycle might go the way of Donald Trump

Washington Post:  Nobody knows for certain who will win on Nov. 8 — but one man is pretty sure: Professor Allan Lichtman, who has correctly predicted every presidential election since 1984.
When we sat down in May, he explained how he comes to a decision. Lichtman's prediction isn't based on horse-race polls, shifting demographics or his own political opinions. Rather, he uses a system of true/false statements he calls the "Keys to the White House" to determine his predicted winner.
And this year, he says, Donald Trump is the favorite to win.
The keys, which are explained in depth in Lichtman’s book “Predicting the Next President: The Keys to the White House 2016” are:

  1. Party Mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.
  2. Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.
  3. Incumbency: The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
  4. Third party: There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
  5. Short-term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
  6. Long-term economy: Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
  7. Policy change: The incumbent  . . . .   

Here is why Officer Shelby should be acquitted and reinstated:

CNN:10 minutes ago
Tulsa officer Betty Shelby booked, released on bond  —   Shelby has been charged with first degree manslaughter in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black man.  If convicted,  she could spend four years in prison.  Regardless,  her career as a police officer is over.  My prediction: she will not be convicted.  Understand that Shelby surely had her reasons for shooting Terence Crutcher,  Most juries understand the pressure our cops work under.  Her defense?  It has already been hinted at   . . . . .  that she thought Crutcher was beginning to reach into his SUV.  The window was open.  We all know that cops function at the "tip of the spear."  There is no life for many if they guess poorly as to a suspects intentions.  We should never put them in a legal situation in which we demand that they sacrifice their lives for the sake of a suspect's life.  There is testimony that Crutcher was ignoring police commands to stop walking.  Combine that reality (if true) with the fear of what he might do next,  and, you have reason enough,  in my opinion,  for acquittal AND reinstatement. 

When haters take to the streets to complain about their perception of the world, they forfiet their right, in practical terms, to be taken seriously.

Colin Campbell / Raleigh News & Observer: Charlotte protesters ‘hate white people,’ NC Congressman Robert Pittenger says

Editor's note:  Whether literally true or not,  this is the question the alt-left has to deal with.  And this perception (see the headline) is working against the Dems in this election cycle.  Understand that these "demonstrations" are viewed as nothing more than opportunities to party and loot,  by the nation's on-lookers.  We all know that looters never represent the majority of those in the "demonstration."  But,  most viewers, also, see looters as those who dominate the news cycle and commanderie the purpose(s) of the demonstration.  The take-away perception for most angry black street gatherings is this:  they are nothing more than opportunities for mayhem.  I am not convinced that the demonstrators understand just how devastating this perception is to what they (the demonstrators) are trying to protest.  In the end,  we tacitly know that angry black demonstrations accomplish next to nothing,  whether they occur on the streets,  or on the sidelines of our football games.  Unless and until the black community begins to effectively deal with the issues affecting them,  we will see no more change than witnessed over the past four decades.  
Related article:  Rioting May Tip Presidential Scales in Crucial North Carolina 

A Mexican politician who is no fan of Trump agrees that Mexico could easily be forced to pay for the wall. Next issue.

Weekly StandardJorge Castañeda, who served as Mexico’s secretary of foreign affairs from 2000 to 2003, and who is currently a professor at New York University, appeared at the Hudson Institute in Washington on Wednesday . . . . . 
Castañeda is certainly no fan of Donald Trump—he said that the property magnate’s ascension to the U.S. presidency would be a “tragedy.” Yet he also said that Donald Trump could quite easily “make Mexico pay” for a border wall—a claim that has been widely ridiculed by our betters in the media.

Editor's note:  When the folks who believe that a man can simply say he is a woman,  and,  presto, he really? is a woman, argue for one catastrophic end to mankind after another,  all without serious proof, when those same people laugh at the claim that Mexico will pay for the wall, well, mental illness can be the only prognosis  . . . . .  that is, if they are being honest in their arguments and claims.   So it comes down to this: is the Marxist cabal sick or dishonest, and,  most importantly,  what difference does it really make,  politically? 

At any rate,  the take-away, here,  is this:  opposition politicians understand that the continuing generosity of the United States to Mexico, presents a certain path to the realization of the Trump promise that "Mexico will pay for the wall,  believe me."   

I told you so.

DHS “Accidentally” Grants Citizenship To 858 Immigrants From Countries That Present National Security Threat – UPDATE: Actual Number More Than 1,800


  When this news first broke,  I suggested that the actual number would be much much more.  Don't be surprised to see this number expanded to 5,000 and more. 
And if you believe this was a mistake,  you do not understand the creativity of the Word Smiths currently in power.  Two or three times a week,  we are told a monstrous lie.  Be nice when this bunch is sent packing  ~  editor.

Did I tell you that Lester Holt, the NBC host for the first debate is . . . . .

. . . .   a Republican.  Maybe that is why Trump has backed off his concern that this debate will be unfair.

Why didn't the media, including Fox News, report this fact about that poll showing Clinton up by six points?

MORE MEDIA LIES=> NBC-WSJ Poll with Hillary Up 6 Points Is Weighted with 14% more Democrat Voters!

Why is this important? Because she claims she did not receive any specific training. Anyone believe that ???

BREAKING: Judge Orders Release of Clinton Security Training Docs To Begin In Five Days

A frustrated federal judge ordered the State Department to begin producing within five days hundreds of documents on whether required or recommended security training, briefings or courses were completed by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides.

Say what you will about our cops. The fact remains that this is not a national problem with national solutions.

Clinton: Police shootings need ‘to become intolerable’

“It’s unbearable, and it needs to become intolerable."

 Say what you will about our cops.  The fact remains that this is not a national problem with national solutions. It's local and effect almost no one   . . . . .   and I am talking about police brutality.  Comments to the contrary are blatant lies told by folks working for a particular agenda.  

Think about this: As of 2013, the United States has 3,007 counties and 19,354 "incorporated places" in the United States. Bet you can't name 15 cities where police brutality is an issue.  

Finally,  if the solution is to make cop shootings "intolerable,"  we are looking at the end of police authority on the streets.  Cops cannot second guess their decision to use a gun or, more often than not,  they will be dead.  

Best solution?  Do what the cops tell you to do and file a complaint with the newspapers or the police chief or whoever after the fact.  Cops work at the tip of the spear.  They get to tell you what you can and cannot do.  Disagree?  Then don't come running to me with your injuries.  Just do what the man says, and work to solve the problems afterwards.  Any other approach leads to anarchy   . . . .   a favorite solution of Barack's.

Louis Farrakhan goes after Barack Obama for his legacy of having done nothing for the American black man. Comments just in time for the election.

From the Blaze:   Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan tore into President Barack Obama over the weekend, saying the outgoing commander in chief has favored Israel and the gay community while sidelining African-Americans.
The controversial minister criticized Obama during a sermon Sunday. Farrakhan said the president’s legacy is not with the Affordable Care Act, but is instead “in the street with your suffering people,” describing the crime-ridden culture in Chicago, Obama’s hometown.  

“If you can’t go and see about them [talking about Obama's black constituency], then don’t worry about your legacy,” Farrakhan charged. “‘Cause the white people that you served so well — they’ll preserve your legacy  . . . the hell they well.” 

Related update:
From Brietbart:  Louis Farrakhan said to President Barack Obama, “Your people are suffering and dying in the streets,” of Chicago, so “you failed to do what should have been done.”

Last month, Trump had a 3% chance of winning this election. Today, according to one of the premier national polling agencies, Trump now has a 48% chance of winning the electioin. polling

The Examiner reported:
The latest vote projection from elections guru Nate Silver has Republican Donald Trump just six electoral votes short of winning and one point away from equaling Hillary Clinton’s popular vote.
The newest Five Thirty Eight survey Trump at 264 and Clinton at 272, two more than needed. It’s the closest in recent weeks.
What’s more, he has the popular vote within the margin of victory, Clinton 45.4 percent to Trump’s 44.3 percent.

A glace at Hillary, yesterday, on her plane, tells us the woman is exhausted, again.

Can you imagine, Mama Hillary actually thinks she has the moral authority to speak to us white folks and correct our evil ways?!

(From Brietbart News):  Hillary Clinton vows she’ll tackle the racism in the nation’s law enforcement system.
We gotta tackle the systemic racism, this horrible shooting again, how many times do we have to see this in our country?” she said in an appearance on the Steve Harvey show. Clinton was specifically referring to the police shooting of Terence Crutcher in Tulsa, Oklahoma, saying he had his “hands in the air” when he was killed.
“This is unbearable and it needs to be intolerable,” she said.
Clinton told Harvey that if the African-American community came out and voted for her, she would work to stop racial shootings by police officers.
“Maybe I can by speaking directly to white people say, ‘Look this is not who we are,’” she said. “We’ve got to do everything possible to improve policing, to go right at implicit bias.

Editor's notes:  For starters,  the shooting of Terence Crutcher just happened yesterday.  Hillary knows absolutely nothing as to the circumstances of his killing.  So, what does she do?  She decides to take the easy way out and ASSUME the shooting is the result of racism.  More than this,  she ASSUMES she has the moral authority to change the thinking of white folks,  as if "whitie" is the problem.   finally,  she ASSUMES that I am more biased than she,  a white woman.  

The actual take away,  here,  is her racist bias against the white community and her willingness to throw our cops under the bus.  Police officers have been injured and some may die because,  in part, of her thoughtlessness.  Indeed,  she is unqualified to be the president of this once great nation. 

As you read the following words from Obama, understand that he is not opposed to border walls, he wants no borders at all !!

<<<  Obama is not a representative of the people.  Rather,  he is a member,  even a leader,  of the autocratic,  borderless world-wide community and he is not going away,  after the election.  

President Barack used his last address to the United Nations to bat down the kind of 'crude populism' he's accused Donald Trump of adopting.
'Today a nation ringed by walls would only imprison itself,' Obama said before the UN's General Assembly.
Obama warned that "alternative visions of the world' will succeed if heads of state don't force a 'course correction' from the current path of globalization."

Never forget that globalism is an authoritarian doctrine of the world's elitists,  not a movement of the people,  by the people and for the people.  In a one world economy,  whether financial or secular,  the people have no voice.  This is precisely the argument the E.U. is having with itself.  Obama is not an American president.  Rather,  he is a socialist dictator, an autocrat,  moving the world away from borders,  stealing the wealth of the successful and giving it to the other leaders of the world (it never goes to the poor or the truly needy, contrary to autocratic propaganda claims).  There are no poor autocrats in world leadership;  think about what that means for you,  a citizen of the world.  

As much as many dislike Piers-Morgan, he understands exactly why Trump is such a problem to the One Worlders in the USA.

Piers-Morgan writes: " . . . . .   despite this unprecedented bombardment of mainstream abuse [he is a bigot, a homophob, a racist, etc] ,  Trump’s poll numbers keep rising and his chances of becoming President keep increasing.
The reason, to me, is obvious: tens of millions of Americans just don’t agree with that withering verdict.
They think Trump’s a fiery, flamboyant, super-rich, shoot-from-the-hip buccaneer on a mission to make America great again.
They agree with him about illegal immigration, about big Government corruption, about Wall Street greed, about ‘crooked’ Hillary Clinton and most pertinently, about the threat of Islamic terrorism.
They see Trump as standing up for them, the little guys, especially the working class little guys, against the Establishment that’s conspiring to ruin their lives."

After reading the following headlines, you will realize that something is definitely wrong with Hillary.

 After reading the following headlines,  you will realize that something is definitely wrong with Hillary.  And don't argue that she is prepping for the debates.  If that were true,  why did she schedule the cancelled events in the first place? She is not prepping.  She is resting and trying to recover her strength  ~   editor.

Tyler Durden /
With Trump Regaining North Carolina Lead, Hillary Unexpectedly Postpones Local Fundraiser “Without Reason”  —  If there was a time Hillary needed to make a public appearance in the key battleground state of North Carolina to drum up voter support, it was today, if for no other reason …

Small NC town prepares for Trump rally; Clinton postpones Chapel Hill event

Trump is questioned for a 258,000 dollar expense but no mention is ever made of Hillary using her foundation to laundry millions and millions. Besides, . . . .

David A. Fahrenthold / Washington Post: Trump used $258,000 from his charity to settle legal problems  

Trump is questioned for a 258,000 dollar expense but no mention is ever made of Hillary using her foundation to laundry millions and millions. Besides, the Trump charity is funded (90%) by Donald J Trump.  In other words,  its his money.  Secondly,  no one in the family draws a paycheck from the foundation,  unlike the Clintons ~ editor.

Hillary's latest crowd of 200. (Scroll down for Trumps rally)

Another "ordinary" Trump rally. Meanwhile, Hillary is speaking to a crowd of 200. 'Nough said.

What the headline does not say is this: "Papa, the whiny Jeb and GW are all going to vote for Hillary." That's my guess.

Darren Samuelsohn / Politico:
George H.W. Bush to vote for Hillary  —  Former President George H.W. Bush is bucking his party's presidential nominee and plans to vote for Hillary Clinton in November, according to a member of another famous political family, the Kennedys.  —  Bush, 92, had intended to stay silent … 
Editor's note:  What the headline does not say is this:  "Papa, the whiny Jeb and GW are all going to vote for Hillary."  That's my guess  . . . .  maybe not GW.  
Look, this whole family,  on the political side of the discussion,  are big government types  (but not progressives).  It was HW who made up "voodoo economics" when talking about Reagan's economic plan.  He made a commitment for "read my lips; no new taxes" and his son,  Jeb,  violated his pledge to support the GOP primary winner, and GW supported "Affordable Housing,"  the progressive policy that gave us the 2008 financial collapse.  Turns out,  collectively,  they cannot be trusted. 
It is time to move away from the Bush family politic.  They have had their day and, now,  it is time to change course in view of the fact that the GOP has failed in its traditional promise to reduce the size of government,  balance the budget and return power to the states.    

BTW,  the Clinton's time [especially Hillary] has come and gone,  as well,  for many of the same reasons. 

Trump's small donor list is only three months old and has 2.1 donors. Hillary, after 20 years of campaignng, has 2.3 million donors.

Shane Goldmacher / Politico: Trump shatters GOP records with small donors

All told, Trump is approaching, and has possibly already passed, $100 million from donors who have given less than $200, according to an analysis of available Federal Election Commission filings, the campaign’s public statements and people familiar with his fundraising operation. It is a threshold no previous Republican has ever achieved in a single campaign. And Trump has done so less than three months after signing his first email solicitation for donors on June 21 — a staggering speed to collect such a vast sum.
“I’ve never seen anything like this,” said a senior Republican operative who has worked closely with the campaign’s small-dollar fundraising operation. “He’s the Republican Obama in terms of online fundraising.”

“I’ve never seen anything like this,” said a senior Republican operative who has worked closely with the campaign’s small-dollar fundraising operation. “He’s the Republican Obama in terms of online fundraising.”

Kasich would like nothing better than for the GOP to lose its hold on both houses of Congress.

Update:  before reading on,  understand that Kasich's warning is nothing but a huge fantasy on par with his thought of winning the GOP nomination without winning the primary challenge or, even,  coming close to to that victory.  The man's "real world" is only a figment of his imagination;  nothing more. Keep that in mind as you read on  ~  editor. 

Kyle Cheney / Politico:
Kasich camp bashes Priebus, warns of national GOP ‘wipeout’  —  Ohio Gov. John Kasich's war with the national Republican Party exploded into the open Sunday night, when his top adviser thrashed GOP leader Reince Priebus and hinted that the presidential election may be out of reach for Donald Trump.
Editor's notes:  Kasich is a self-serving arrogant ass who puts his personal agenda ahead of any commitments he made during the primary season,  proving, of course,  that he has no principles worth passing on to our readers.  He and Cruz,  polar opposites,  are men with no credibility.   They made pledges to support the GOP with no intentions of following through if that support meant to include Donald Trump.  When the time comes to put Humpty Dumpty back together again,  these men should be passed over.  If they continue to  pretend to be part of the solution,  those of us who know better should ensure that they become the center of the political GOP storms.  Phonies all.    
The only bit of satisfaction in all this, for me,  is found in the fact that Trump seems to be doing well in Ohio polling.    While Kasich and Cruz remain popular within their own constituencies,  the logic of refusing Trump,  giving Hillary a pathway to the presidency,  is overwhelming.  This simply must not happen.  
Understand that I make that last statement,  not so much because of Hillary,  but because Obama has done all he can do to force Hillary into supporting and continuing his subversive "legacy" for this once great nation.    You should know that Barack made it clear,  months ago,  that a DOJ investigation into Hillary's email scandal is still possible.  As long as that is a viable possibility,  Barack has leverage over Hillary.    If Hillary wins the election,  then,  and only then,  will we meet the real Hillary,  free from the coattails of her husband and threats from a cold blooded president  (Barack Obama).  Will she cut her own path or remain subservient to those who have controlled her life,  to date? 

The nation will survive a Hillary presidency,  but,  who wants to survive when we can make America great again? 

Is it 800 or 8,000 or 100,000 Muslim refugees granted US Citizenship?

Feds Mistakenly Grant Citizenship to 800 Immigrants with Security Concerns...

 If you believe that "800" is not a stealth admission that we do not know how many the Administration has already granted citizenship to,  then you are not paying attention to what Obama is doing to this country.  We know that over 100,000 Somalian refugees have been admitted into this country,  under the feel good policies of Bush and [especially] Barack Obama.  One thing for certain,  Barack and his henchmen do not care about the naturalization laws of this country or they would enforce border patrol and work within the existing immigration system rather finding ways to work around the law. 

Black support for Hillary falls from 90% to 71.4 !!!!!!

The NY Post gives us this story line:  Donald Trump is gaining support among African-American voters — whose enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton is eroding, a tracking poll released Saturday revealed.
Trump saw a 16.5 percentage-point increase in backing from African-American voters in a Los Angeles Times/University of Southern California tracking poll, up from 3.1 percent on Sept. 10 to 19.6 percent through Friday.
Meanwhile, the same poll showed Clinton’s support among that group plummeting from 90.4 percent on Sept. 10 to 71.4 percent.

He used very similar words in 2014 and suffered the most one-sided defeat in mid-term history.

Associated Press :   Obama said his name may not be on the ballot, but issues of importance to the black community were, including justice, good schools and ending mass incarceration.

“I will consider it a personal insult, an insult to my legacy if this community lets down its guard and fails to activate itself in this election,” Obama said with a stern look and booming passion. “You want to give me a good send-off, go vote.”

Editor's notes:  Never mind the fact that Obama has done absolutely nothing for the black community he pretends to support.  Nothing but a classless, self-serving jerk.  Clearly,  he thinks his eight years was all about him,  not the country. 

ObamaCare was never going to fulfill the empty promises Obama made for the program. It was only and always a wealth transfer program.

Despite years of Obama’s promises that America’s health care costs would go down if Obamacare was passed into law, new statistics show that care and insurance premiums have risen more this year than in the last 32 years.


Read the full story here:

Notes on gun control in Australia: Its not what "they" say it is.

Report on “Unprecedented” Criminal Firearm Misuse in Melbourne Undermines Hillary and Obama’s Calls for Australia-Style Gun Control

While anti-gun politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama tout Australia’s gun control laws as a model for the United States, recent reporting on crime in Melbourne from newspaper The Age revealed the limitations of Australia’s stringent laws. According to the paper, “Despite Australia’s strict gun control regime, criminals are now better armed than at any time since then-Prime Minister John Howard introduced a nationwide firearm buyback scheme in response to the 1996 Port Arthur massacre.” The paper’s reporting illustrates what gun rights advocates have long contended; that gun controls merely disarm the law-abiding and are ineffective in confronting criminal conduct.

Proof that the Clinton Foundation is nothing short of a scam.

Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”
The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.

Who started the birther movement? It wasn't Barack. It certainly wasn't Trump. Strike Bush and Kerry from the list. No one is left but Hillary. You figure it out.

We have these two tweets that prove Hillary's campaign started the birther "movement."   Obviously Trump did not start the movement.  Count Obama out,  as well,  So,  who is left but the Hillary campaign.  

Back to these two tweets.  Sid Blumenthal  was Hillary's henchman back in 2007/2008  . . .  still is.  

Tweet One:  

#CNN says #Hillary team in 2008 never raised #birther issue. #SidBlumenthal, long-time buddy, told me in person #Obama born in #kenya,' 

Tweet Two

Asher wrote.
Asher wrote in another Tweet: '#CNN says #Hillary team in 2008 never raised #Obama's birth in #Kenya. Who is closer to #HRC than #SidBlumenthal, who told me face-to-face.'

To be clear, back in 2008, former McClatchy newspapers Washington bureau chief James Asher wrote on Twitter that longtime Hillary Clinton friend and advisor Sidney Blumenthal peddled the rumor to him personally in his office.

Now we know why Kaepernick betrayed his country:

Now we know why US News and World Report has such a small following.

Nearly 20 Percent of Trump Supporters Think Lincoln Shouldn't Have Freed the Slave. 

Now we know why US News and World Report has such a small following.   First,  this claim is so ridiculous as to defy a reasoned response.  Secondly,  Trump does not believe this.  The only folks in this world who agree with the headline are Democrats who have left that party  . . . .  i.e. Southern Democrats.  

No one has the right to forget that the GOP had its beginning fighting and dying to free the slaves.  And who did they fight?  The Democrat Party and the self serving plantation owners in that party.  The response?  The Dem created the KKK, segregated our schools,  wrote ALL of the Jim Crow laws,  and, today,  has a 50 year track record of using the black community to win elections while marginalizing their inner city plight between election cycles.    


"Character" has little to do with Trump's support. People are hunger for a leader who will actually listen to them.

David Brock OFFERS CASH For Trump DIRT...

The Dems made this offer nearly a year ago.  Nothing new about the offer,  and nothing much will come of it.  I mean,  its not like they have missed throwing the kitchen sink at the guy.  Most of us are not voting on Trump's character or Obama and Hillary would never have reached the supposed popularity of this day and time.  "No character" seems to be a mark of achievement.  So,  what is left?  Someone who will work for the people.  At least, Trump talks about it, almost none stop. 

Obama Hussein's birth certificate is NOT a problem for the Trump campaign. So stop talking about it. BTW, it only took Barack 4 stinking years to come up with his birth certificate.

- September 15, 2016 -

Trump Campaign Statement

"Hillary Clinton’s campaign first raised this issue to smear then-candidate Barack Obama in her very nasty, failed 2008 campaign for President. This type of vicious and conniving behavior is straight from the Clinton Playbook. As usual, however, Hillary Clinton was too weak to get an answer. Even the MSNBC show Morning Joe admits that it was Clinton’s henchmen who first raised this issue, not Donald J. Trump.

In 2011, Mr. Trump was finally able to bring this ugly incident to its conclusion by successfully compelling President Obama to release his birth certificate. Mr. Trump did a great service to the President and the country by bringing closure to the issue that Hillary Clinton and her team first raised. Inarguably, Donald J. Trump is a closer. Having successfully obtained President Obama’s birth certificate when others could not, Mr. Trump believes that President Obama was born in the United States.
Mr. Trump is now totally focused on bringing jobs back to America, defeating radical Islamic terrorism, taking care of our veterans, introducing school choice opportunities and rebuilding and making our inner cities safe again." – Jason Miller, Senior Communications Advisor

IT WAS A SET UP and Trump did not fall for the trap.

She knew Trump would push his candidacy  . . . .  as he should. 

The plan,  from the beginning,  was to embarrass Trump with the hopes of moving Trump into some kind of rant.  Instead,  he was gracious and the pastor looked like a fool.

Eight years ago the New Black Panther Party intimidated voters. This year they will intimidate the police as well as voters.

As of this writing, 3,033 people have been shot in Chicago this year, yet less than half of 1 percent of those incidents involved the police, accounting for five people killed and 14 wounded. And, last year, there were 2,988 shootings with 25 involving police; this is less than 1 percent. The people in the neighborhoods do not give information nor support police investigations, so the police just stay out, and these shootings go unsolved. Blaming the cops, in effect, has given gangs control of our cities. Black and Hispanic gangs are contending for control of the drug trade. Drugs and guns are being shipped across the Mexican border by Hispanic cartels and are distributed by black street gangs. So, why blame the police? 
Eight years ago the New Black Panther Party intimidated voters. This year they will intimidate the police as well as voters.
From Michael F. McCarthy, Hayward, Calif.

24 GOP Senate seats are in this election campaign and 11 are in "blue states." That's the bad news. Here is the good news:

After a summer of doom-and-gloom predictions that the Senate was all but lost, Republicans are in the midst of an upswing that’s put them in better position to hang on than at any point since the 2014 midterms.

The GOP has hit a gusher of money from outside groups, forcing Democrats to shift their campaign tactics in difficult races. A spate of recent polls show Republicans gaining or even jumping ahead in competitive states thought to be slipping away.

Of the 324 million folks in the country, only 122 million pay taxes. Most of Hillary's "deplorables" are part of the 122 million number who actually work hard enough to pay taxes.

Those of us that are taxpayers, could view ourselves as the "servants" of those in power, who are making rules that we seem to have no say over.

I was looking up tax information the other day and the figures surprised me. There's about 324 million people in this country, yet, only about 122 million people pay taxes. According to what I was reading, the tax structure means lower and middle income Americans pay more. 20% of the population is on welfare, so they are not paying taxes. Ultra rich pay big bucks to accountants and lawyers to make sure their contribution is a smaller percentage then I pay. And companies like Mylan the EpiPen manufacturer relocate their main offices to the Netherlands and re-incorporate under Netherlands laws so they can avoid having to pay taxes to this country, but still lobby our government, to pass laws that personally benefit them and allow their CEO to bring home a $19 million dollar salary, and that is just salary alone, while a life saving device that people with allergies need, costs $3. to make and they charge $600. for it. And Mylan lobbies Congress to pass a law requiring all schools to provide EpiPens, which Congress agreed to. And they have a new lobby going on to require them on all airplanes.

So - yes, we absolutely could be thinking that those in power and with wealth see us as their servants, not their peers or their equals. And to me, I see Hillary Clinton as tied to the hip to people in this category. She talks a good game of 'inclusion' but she includes [those] who agree with her outlook on the world. Out the other side of her mouth, comes the word 'deplorables' to describe half the country. What is she planning to do after elected, annex a part of the country and ship all the Trump supporters there?