In case you missed it, the godless party-without-morals is now going after the Hallmark network.
Fox News: Hallmark veteran actor Dean Cain is coming to the
network’s defense after a website published a contentious article
claiming its holiday movies are “fascist propaganda.”
Cain appeared on Friday’s episode of “Fox & Friends” and blasted Salon.com and its writer, Amanda Marcotte, for spewing out “terrible” allegations against Hallmark on Wednesday.
Marcotte’s article titled “Hallmark movies are fascist propaganda,” released on Christmas, argued that the network’s holiday film schedule is “like a trip into an uncanny valley of shiny-teethed, blow-dried heteronormative whiteness, with only a few token movies with characters of color.”
Keep reading…
in case you were wondering , Senate GOP is united on trial strategy.
NY Post:
After weeks of behind-the-scenes debate, Senate Republicans have hit on their strategy for handling President Trump’s impeachment: a brief trial — with no witness testimony — and a fast acquittal.
“I’m ready to vote now,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) told The Hill. “I think the articles are a joke.”
But they don’t want to dismiss the House Democrats’ charges out of hand, as some Trump allies have proposed.
“It’s time for him to have his day in court,” Hawley said. “The president deserves to have due process.”
Trump, who was calling for a full-blown trial with multiple witnesses — including former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter — just three weeks ago, now supports the Senate leadership’s plan.
Barack as a Supreme Court Justice? Well, at least we know he will be the most predictable justice on the court in the history of the institution.
Biden Says He's Open To Nominating Obama For Supreme Court
Barack has always "gotten along" via his ability to BS the people he knows or who see him as some sort of hero. I mean, why in the world do you think he was given the Nobel Peace Prize for no demonstrable reason, or, became President without having managed so much as a fruit stand, and, with virtually no congressional experience whatsoever. And now "they" are talking about giving him the Supreme Court, an assignment for which he is grossly unqualified, having never practiced law in a serious way, and, as while President, even receinded his law license for an unknown reason.
State of the Democrat Primary Race at the end of December, 2020
Dec 27: After enjoying a brief surge in the polls
in early fall, closing the gap or even surpassing former Vice President
Joe Biden in the polls in early October, Warren has lost momentum.
Nearly all recent national polls
show Warren having slipped back into third place behind Biden, who
enjoys a double digit lead over the field in many polls, and democratic
socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (VT).
A recent CNN poll gives Biden 26 of the Democratic vote, Sanders 20, and Warren 16. An NBC News/WSJ survey shows Biden with 28, Sanders 21, and Warren 18. Emerson gives Biden 32, Sanders 25, and Warren just 12. In some polls, Biden’s support more than doubles that of Warren, including a recent survey by The Hill, which gives Biden 29 and both Sanders and Warren 13.
Source: Trending Politics.com
A recent CNN poll gives Biden 26 of the Democratic vote, Sanders 20, and Warren 16. An NBC News/WSJ survey shows Biden with 28, Sanders 21, and Warren 18. Emerson gives Biden 32, Sanders 25, and Warren just 12. In some polls, Biden’s support more than doubles that of Warren, including a recent survey by The Hill, which gives Biden 29 and both Sanders and Warren 13.
Source: Trending Politics.com
Let it be known that this year's Democrat Primary is the Year of the Three Geezers
Sanders is 78, Biden 77 and Warren is 70 All three are millionaires. All three are to the Left of 2/3 of this nation's population. And, all three are white.
Thoughts on psycho-analysis and the intrinsic need for oneness
Eric W. Dolan / Raw Story:
Psychiatry expert says Trump's rambling Merry Christmas rant includes three signs of serious mental impairment
— President Donald Trump's speech in Florida over the weekend provides
evidence that he is suffering from cognitive decline, according to a
psychiatric expert.
Editor: Because of the truth embedded in our headline, you should know that such headlines as the one appearing in the fairly unknown publication known as "The Raw Story," are the product of a cabal of impostors, not just unprofessional, but unqualified impostors.
Anytime you read of psychiatry's prognosis as to the mental health of the President, know this: No psychiatrist worth his credentials will psycho-analyze the President (or anyone) without an extended interview over a period of weeks, and, you cannot find a professional opinion that debates this point.
If a "prognosis at a distance" is both unqualified and unprofessional, what is its purpose?
To give an answer to this question, we start with the fact that if someone is branded as being "mentally ill" by those who are not qualified to make such a statemnt, the end result is "name-calling." And "name-calling" is always the strategy of the immature.
Secondly, the immature are always without serious ideas or realistic/practical applications. They are always all about themselves, never trusting in the innate intelligence of others when those folks donot embrace the fantasy of the immature. Take a favorite toy away from a child and what happens? They throw a fit, lay on the floor and scream, start throwing stuff, and in every way act as if they are wholly undeserving of a partnership that goes beyond mutual agreements. Their eyes cross when someone suggests that "we can be one even when we disagree." And when society as a whole, loses sight of that fact, it becomes hopelessly divided . . . . . . and doomed.
Now you know. Think about it.
After voting for impeachment, "they" refuse to send their approved conclusions to the trial. But wait, there is more:
John Sexton / HotAir:
House Dems: We May Go Back For Seconds On Impeachment
— The House has already decided to hold off on delivering the articles of impeachment to the Senate in an attempt to drag out the process.
Now the AP reports Democrats are threatening to add more articles and,
presumably, have another vote to approve them.
Editor: It is painfully clear that the Dems have no confidence in their case agaisnt our President, They know that their contrived case only works when it is controlled by Democrat council. The second it goes to the Senate, the fantasy of 'impeach and remove" is dead.
Remember the adage, "Tell a lie long enough, and it will become 'truth' to most?" Well, that notion has worked for the Dems over and over again, for decades. But in the face of the opposing force that is Donald Trump, lies really only(?) work for the most partisan. Since before the Trumps victory, the whole world (or so it seems) has fiersely opposed this man.
Can Donald Trump and his patriotic nation surive the current onslaught? Only time will tell.But this I know: Such is the nature of the debate . . . truth versus a gigantic lie.
That very negative Christianity Today article? Here is that author's opinion of the blue-collar evangelical.
The Christian Post:
“I know hardly anyone, let alone any evangelical Christian who voted for
Trump. I describe evangelicals like me as ‘elite’ evangelicals … and
this class of evangelicals has discovered that we have family members so
different they seem like aliens in our midst. These other evangelicals
often haven’t finished college, and if they have jobs (and apparently a
lot of them don’t), they are blue-collar jobs or entry-level work. They
don’t write books or give speeches; they don’t attend conferences of
evangelicals for social justice or evangelicals for immigration reform.
They are deeply suspicious of mainstream media. A lot of them voted for
Donald Trump.”
Contrast the above elitiest comment/attitude with this statement:
This attitude is distinctly unbiblical. In Philippians, the Apostle Paul
describes Jesus —the only one who rightly deserves elite status — as
one who, “though in the form of God, did not count equality with God as a
thing to be grasped, but humbled himself.” Instead, Jesus washed His
disciples’ feet, fellowshipped with sinners, tax collectors and the
racially “unclean,” and was the first to champion equality for women,
slaves, and even lepers.
And wityh these two statements, we have perfectly framed the cultural aspect of the national debate.
Trump and his GOP Senate partners are bringing the Federal Court System beck into balance and that is one reason the Dems hate Trump.
NY Post:
Re-order in the courts!
As House Democrats try to force President Trump out of office, Senate Republicans have been plowing ahead with his plan to transform the federal judiciary.
A record number of judicial confirmations is cementing one of Trump’s central campaign pledges — and will reverberate for decades, even if impeachment pulls the plug on his presidency.
When Trump took office, nine of the nation’s 13 circuit courts were dominated by Democratic appointees. Now, seven of them have Republican majorities.
Trump has had 50 of his circuit-court judges confirmed — far more than any other recent president at this point in their first terms. President Barack Obama managed just half that number, 25, in the same time frame.
Altogether, 187 Trump-nominated federal judges have been confirmed by the Senate — outpacing the 169 new judges named by George W. Bush and the 166 brought on board by Bill Clinton in their first three years.
Senators approved two Trump nominees, Patrick Bumatay and Lawrence VanDyke, for seats on Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Dec. 10 and 11 as the House Judiciary Committee tussled over the phrasing of its impeachment articles.
And last week, as House Democrats voted to impeach Trump, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pushed 13 district court judges through the Senate.
Keep reading…
Pelosi reveals her treacherous plan: Only McConnell and the Senate GOP stand in her way. To hell with the Constitution, right Nancy?
"We haven't ruled out witnesses," McConnell said in an interview with
"Fox & Friends." "We've said, 'Let's handle this case just like we
did with President Clinton.' Fair is fair."
In that 1999 trial, he said, senators went through opening arguments, had a written question period and then decided what witnesses to call based on that.
Editor: Understand that neither the House Dems nor Nancy Pelosi have any leverage in the up and coming Senate trial. And it makes no difference which party controls the Senate. There simply are not enough GOP votes in the Senate to convict Trump of anything but doing a great job.
Also know this. the end of the search and destroy mission has now arrived. The Senate trial is not be an extension of the past three years. Rather, the Senate trial is the end of the matter. Its only duty is to pass judgment on the articles for impeachment, to judge their veracity and to either acquit or convict on that basis. The search for more evidence is over. If the Dems want more testimony or more "evidence," they should have extended their impeachment hearings. They chose not to and now they must live with the consequences . . . . . . . . . period.
In that 1999 trial, he said, senators went through opening arguments, had a written question period and then decided what witnesses to call based on that.
Editor: Understand that neither the House Dems nor Nancy Pelosi have any leverage in the up and coming Senate trial. And it makes no difference which party controls the Senate. There simply are not enough GOP votes in the Senate to convict Trump of anything but doing a great job.
Also know this. the end of the search and destroy mission has now arrived. The Senate trial is not be an extension of the past three years. Rather, the Senate trial is the end of the matter. Its only duty is to pass judgment on the articles for impeachment, to judge their veracity and to either acquit or convict on that basis. The search for more evidence is over. If the Dems want more testimony or more "evidence," they should have extended their impeachment hearings. They chose not to and now they must live with the consequences . . . . . . . . . period.
Just for the record . . . . (an opinion regarding the Dems effort to destroy the President).
It is not the Senate's job to retry or in some way amend the House's case except, in the sense, that it (the Senate) receives the charge to impeach and passes judgment on the case presented to it.
Understand this, the House could have taken the time - in the courts - to insure that the witnesses it now "requires" to be present in the Senate, make appearances in the House. It had three years and 11 investigations to draw from, to make its impeachment case. If that is not enough, then the Dems failed . . . and it now time to finalize that verdict .
As has been the case over and over and over again, the House mounts an attack on the President only to move on to next "bombshell" claim, moving on as if nothing in the past ever took place. Mueller is gone and forgotten. So too is the Access Hollywood video, or emoluments accusation, or any hint of campaign finance fraud, or the "guiltless" conclusions of the FBI investigation, the two House investigations, and the Senate investigation. They tried Trump in the Kavanha nonsense. They dug up nude pictures of Malania They attacked Barron. They made fun of Trump in public, on camera. And they accused and convicted Trump on a daily basis in the media . . . all without bringing this man to his knees. And now, they want to control the Senate. Bastards all, unforgivably so.
Understand this, the House could have taken the time - in the courts - to insure that the witnesses it now "requires" to be present in the Senate, make appearances in the House. It had three years and 11 investigations to draw from, to make its impeachment case. If that is not enough, then the Dems failed . . . and it now time to finalize that verdict .
As has been the case over and over and over again, the House mounts an attack on the President only to move on to next "bombshell" claim, moving on as if nothing in the past ever took place. Mueller is gone and forgotten. So too is the Access Hollywood video, or emoluments accusation, or any hint of campaign finance fraud, or the "guiltless" conclusions of the FBI investigation, the two House investigations, and the Senate investigation. They tried Trump in the Kavanha nonsense. They dug up nude pictures of Malania They attacked Barron. They made fun of Trump in public, on camera. And they accused and convicted Trump on a daily basis in the media . . . all without bringing this man to his knees. And now, they want to control the Senate. Bastards all, unforgivably so.
In case you were wondering, maybe the king had nothing to do with Khashoggi's death or . . .
Saudi sentences five to death, three to jail over Khashoggi murder
In case you were wondering, maybe the king had nothing to do with Khashoggi's death or maybe, just maybe, he ordered his death and the sentence of the five is a rather brutal cover for his misdeeds?
Now we KNOW that Ukrain attempted to interfere against Trump in the 2016 elections.
Three Ukrainian Officials Swear Under Oath that Ukraine Interfered in the 2016 US Election Against Donald Trump (VIDEO)
Now we KNOW that Ukraine attempted to interfere against Trump in the 2016 elections despite the constant denials of the self-serving elitists in the Progressive/Socialist/Democrat Party.
Look, we all should be united in accepting the testimony of Ukraine's government on the issues of meddling in US affairs and the matter centered in the "quid pro quo" debacle. Ukraine leadership should be the first and only authority as to current affairs in the Ukraine. Unfortunately, The Dems never seem to want Ukraine imput. They would rather pontificate via their own attornies and diplomatic personnel rather than go the source of Ukraine official conduct . . . the Ukrainian government itself.
Why? Because that source of information does not work with the narrative the Dems to want to foster. None of it is true of course. All of it (the Democrat narrative) is political and a lie. And it because of the Progressive Narrative that the above headline is so npopular with the Left.
An over-view of the "worst case senario" (short of Trump losing his re-election bid) is given definition in this post:
BREAKING NEWS: Schumer’s proposal to McConnell. If he rejects these
reasonable ground rules & insists on a non-trial, the House should
consider treating that as a breach of the Senate’s oath &
withholding the Articles until the Senate reconsiders.
Editor: In addition to this extension of idiotcy, Pelosi is threatening to hold up sending the impeachment bill from the House to Seante until the Senate moves to protect "due process" as relates to the House charges of impeachment.
McConnell says, "No deal." And that should be fine with all of us. Pelosi really has very little leverage, here. There will be no more debates about impeachment or at least none that any Republican member should attend. I mean, the case for impeachment is over. If she hopes to delay sending the House Impeachment Bill until after the election, in the hopes of recapturing the Senate, that changes absolutely nothing. Why?
Well, lets say the Dems retake the Senate. It still takes 67 votes to find the President "guilty," and that would require a Senate vote of 67 including approximately 13 to 15 Republicans . . . . the same number of GOP defections required in the GOP controlled Senate, today. In other words, without a clear cut crime, there is simply no way the Dems can remove Trump except via an election.
Of course, without the Senate and the House, Trump's presidency would be stymied. Understand the only point I am making is this: Impeachment is not the solution to the Dems' desire to get rid of Trump. Never was.
You should know that a President without either house of Congress, is not entirely helpless. He can prevent the Dems from reversing his judical appointments, prevent them from packing the courts with One World Socialist judges, keep his regulation agenda in place, and keep a reasonable tax policy in place as well as get get things done via executive order. More than this, the President can utilize a thing called a "signing statement" (under existing presidential powers) to refuse to enforce any number of sections in a bill, should he sign that bill. He could not not add to the bill, that would be legislation. But he certainly could release a signing statement detailing what parts of the bill he intends not to enforce.
Finally, you should know that the last time the Dems controlled the House and the Senate (2009 - 2010), that reality only lasted two years. In other words, should the worst happen, it is extremely possible for the President to own one of the two houses in the last half of his second term.
Now you know.
Editor: In addition to this extension of idiotcy, Pelosi is threatening to hold up sending the impeachment bill from the House to Seante until the Senate moves to protect "due process" as relates to the House charges of impeachment.
McConnell says, "No deal." And that should be fine with all of us. Pelosi really has very little leverage, here. There will be no more debates about impeachment or at least none that any Republican member should attend. I mean, the case for impeachment is over. If she hopes to delay sending the House Impeachment Bill until after the election, in the hopes of recapturing the Senate, that changes absolutely nothing. Why?
Well, lets say the Dems retake the Senate. It still takes 67 votes to find the President "guilty," and that would require a Senate vote of 67 including approximately 13 to 15 Republicans . . . . the same number of GOP defections required in the GOP controlled Senate, today. In other words, without a clear cut crime, there is simply no way the Dems can remove Trump except via an election.
Of course, without the Senate and the House, Trump's presidency would be stymied. Understand the only point I am making is this: Impeachment is not the solution to the Dems' desire to get rid of Trump. Never was.
You should know that a President without either house of Congress, is not entirely helpless. He can prevent the Dems from reversing his judical appointments, prevent them from packing the courts with One World Socialist judges, keep his regulation agenda in place, and keep a reasonable tax policy in place as well as get get things done via executive order. More than this, the President can utilize a thing called a "signing statement" (under existing presidential powers) to refuse to enforce any number of sections in a bill, should he sign that bill. He could not not add to the bill, that would be legislation. But he certainly could release a signing statement detailing what parts of the bill he intends not to enforce.
Finally, you should know that the last time the Dems controlled the House and the Senate (2009 - 2010), that reality only lasted two years. In other words, should the worst happen, it is extremely possible for the President to own one of the two houses in the last half of his second term.
Now you know.
Keep in mind that the new agreed upon spending bill, was drafted by Democrats in the House so don't listen to these clowns blame Trump.
Washington Post:
House passes $1.4 trillion spending deal and sends it to Senate ahead of shutdown deadline
Just to be clear, the spending bill per Constitutional provision, is the creation of the House (Democrats) . . . no more restrictions on the border wall, a huge military budget, the largest of the past three years. Trump will get the Media Blame, but the biil is wholly the product of bipartisanship, period,.
Just to be clear, the spending bill per Constitutional provision, is the creation of the House (Democrats) . . . no more restrictions on the border wall, a huge military budget, the largest of the past three years. Trump will get the Media Blame, but the biil is wholly the product of bipartisanship, period,.
The FISA Court, itself, issues a stark condemnation of the FBI. Time for a change, starting at the top of that agency.
Pete Williams / NBC News:
Secret FISA Court issues highly unusual public rebuke of FBI for mistakes
— The criticism comes after a report by the DOJ inspector general that
found “so many basic and fundamental errors.” — WASHINGTON — The
secret court that approves orders to conduct surveillance on suspected
foreign terrorists
In case you were wondering about Jeff Van Drew: Here is the before and after picture of the man who is now switching parties:
Sam Brodey / The Daily Beast:
Rep. Jeff Van Drew Was ‘Almost Obsessively Anti-Trump’ Before He Considered Joining His Party
— Democrats heard the New Jersey freshman call President Trump crazy
and unfit to be commander-in-chief. — For months, Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a
freshman Democrat from New Jersey …
Well, we wake up to a letter the President addressed to Pelosi and the Media wants you to believe that it proves the unstability of the President. Read the letter for yourself. The man is hardly unstable.
Read the full letter below: (click on the link for the 5 page letter.)
In the New York Magazine, we have this rather trivial commentary:
In the New York Magazine, we have this rather trivial commentary:
On Tuesday afternoon, the day before the House votes on the third impeachment in U.S. history, Trump sent a letter
to Speaker Nancy Pelosi claiming that Democrats are “declaring open war
on American Democracy” by pursuing the constitutional process to remove
the president for abusing his power and obstructing justice. In a
six-page example of projection, Trump claimed that Democrats:
Are
the ones interfering in America’s elections. You are the ones
subverting America’s Democracy. You are the ones Obstructing Justice.
You are the ones bringing pain and suffering to our Republic for your
own selfish personal, political, and partisan gain
Trump
also condemned the FBI for its “horrifying abuses of power,” referring
to the agency’s decision to open an investigation into the Trump
campaign’s contacts with Russia, which was recently determined by the
Department of Justice Inspector General to be justified. He also personally insulted the House Speaker over her claim
that she “pray[s] for the president all the time.” Trump wrote: “Even
worse than offending the Founding Fathers, you are offending Americans
of faith by continually saying ‘I pray for the President,’ when you know
this statement is not true, unless it is meant in a negative sense.”
Later on Tuesday, it emerged
that Trump’s letter was drafted along with senior adviser Stephen
Miller, and that White House lawyers were not included in the process.
Like many presidential missives, it wasn’t fact checked: When the
president cites his electoral college victory as something Democrats
“will never get over,” he says he won 306 to 227. His count is off, as
two electoral college defectors did not vote for him.
Editor: And it is this Presidential letter that portends to show just how unhinged and unstable the President is, all of which is based on a rather avergae writing style. The letter's content was fine but the grammatical issue could have been better. No surprise. No biggie. I mean if we are going to assert mental illness based on grammar or content style, the last paragraph above, is rather condemning. For exsample: No one writes "it emerged." And the fact checking "error" was no error at all. The President did garner 306 electoral votes. Two of the electors chose to dishonor their charge from the people, and voted their own choice. that is the fact of the matter . . . . . . . and 306 to 227 is a convincing margin of victory, a "landslide?" if you will.
Examples of the Media's pretend outrage:
CNN: Fact check: Trump's wild letter to Pelosi is filled with false and misleading claims
Jennifer Rubin / Washington Post: It is hard to capture how bizarre and frightening Trump's letter to Pelosi is
Examples of the Media's pretend outrage:
CNN: Fact check: Trump's wild letter to Pelosi is filled with false and misleading claims
Jennifer Rubin / Washington Post: It is hard to capture how bizarre and frightening Trump's letter to Pelosi is
China has tripled the size of its military force (all levels) and now this:
Retired USAF general warns of ‘great space war,’ says China is building ‘Space Navy’
Clearly, the Commies are working for word domination
and it probably will not end well, especially if the
Progressives manage that war.
Now they want a 20 year prison sentence for Trump. And they wanted to try GW Bush as a war criminal.
Democrats Make Up Wire Fraud Charge to “Criminally” Indict Trump — And Suggest 20 YEARS IN PRISON!
Until the Moron Policical Class grows up, the next 20 years (one generation) is going to be a Clown Farm. Be sure to keep voing for these clowns.
I am not sure the Supreme Court just undercut the Dems plans for impeachment:
The
decision by the Supreme Court to review the lower court rulings
involving congressional and prosecution subpoenas directed toward President Trump undercuts the second article of impeachment that passed the House Judiciary Committee along party lines last week.
That second article of impeachment charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress for refusing to comply with congressional subpoenas in the absence of a final court order. In so charging him, the House Judiciary Committee has arrogated to itself the power to decide the validity of its subpoenas, as well as the power to determine whether claims of executive privilege must be recognized, both powers that properly belong with the judicial branch of our government, not the legislative branch. The House of Representatives will do likewise, if it votes to approve the articles, as is expected to occur on Wednesday.
That second article of impeachment charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress for refusing to comply with congressional subpoenas in the absence of a final court order. In so charging him, the House Judiciary Committee has arrogated to itself the power to decide the validity of its subpoenas, as well as the power to determine whether claims of executive privilege must be recognized, both powers that properly belong with the judicial branch of our government, not the legislative branch. The House of Representatives will do likewise, if it votes to approve the articles, as is expected to occur on Wednesday.
Biden tells another whopper:
Joe Biden Falsely Claims He Found GOP Votes For Obamacare when, in fact, there were no GOP votes. It too, was a wholly partisan affair.
Tthe Dems continue to poison the "jury pool" sitting in judgment of President Trump
The House Judiciary Committee link to the report on the impeachment of President Donald Trump appears on PDF. Read if you will, but understnad that ANYindictment sounds damning when the defense is not cited or allowed or tampered . . . . . . . . so, without the defense, the release of the Democrat report is only propaganda, nothing more.
Carter Page, the CIA Agent used by Comey to frame the Russian Hoax and the resulting FBI surveillance against Trump? THAT Carter Page; his pending suit against our Intel Agencies is only getting stronger:
James Comey said Sunday that he was “wrong” about the FBI’s handling
of surveillance warrants against Carter Page, who the former FBI
director acknowledged was “treated unfairly” by having his name leaked
to the press as a suspected Russian agent.
“He is right. I was wrong,” Comey said in an interview on “Fox News Sunday” in reference to the findings of Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general.
“He is right. I was wrong,” Comey said in an interview on “Fox News Sunday” in reference to the findings of Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general.
Payback is a beach, right? And the Leftists plan to actually complain about it. Wow.
Wa Post: Don’t worry, Sen. Graham. No one thought you’d be fair.
Yes, Wallce is a Democrat and his bias is now quict clear
Margaret Sullivan / Washington Post:
Chris Wallace wants journalists to push for the truth. But Fox News often traffics in propaganda.
In fact, according to Wikipedia, Wallace has been a registered Democrat for more than two decades. He explains that being a Democrat is a must for a news report in D.C. Sound like so much crap to me.
In fact, according to Wikipedia, Wallace has been a registered Democrat for more than two decades. He explains that being a Democrat is a must for a news report in D.C. Sound like so much crap to me.
Guess what: I haven't needed proof for years. Ditto virtually all of my friends
The IG Report Is Proof We Should Never Trust 99% Of The Media Ever Again: Unfit To Print
Despite how the elites feel about the blue collar slup, things are pretty damn good; turns out we are winning . . . been winning, slowly but surely, since Reagan.
Virginia is considering using the National Guard to confiscate legal owner guns. Yeah - keep voting for these clowns and soon, you all will not have a single liberty, Constitutional Amendments be damned.
Washington Examiner reports:
‘The law is the law’: Virginia Democrats float prosecution and National Guard deployment if police don’t enforce gun control
Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill say local police who do not enforce gun control measures likely to pass in Virginia should face prosecution and even threats of the National Guard.
After November’s Virginia Legislature elections that led to Democrats taking control of both chambers, the gun control legislation proposed by some Democrats moved forward, including universal background checks, an “assault weapons” ban, and a red flag law.
Legal firearm owners in the state, however, joined with their sheriffs to form Second Amendment sanctuary counties, which declare the authorities in these municipalities uphold the Second Amendment in the face of any gun control measure passed by Richmond.
Over 75 counties in Virginia have so far adopted such Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions in the commonwealth, the latest being Spotsylvania County. The board of supervisors voted unanimously to approve a resolution declaring that county police will not enforce state-level gun laws that violate Second Amendment rights…
Democratic Virginia Rep. Donald McEachin suggested cutting off state funds to counties that do not comply with any gun control measures that pass in Richmond…
McEachin also noted that Democratic Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam could call the National Guard, if necessary.
While the Dems continue to fight Trump every inch of the way, here is what was accomplished this past week.
- An agreement on a new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal. The USMCA was held hostage by Pelosi until she simply could not put it off another week.
- A new budget including more than $1.3 billion for a border wall and blocks a government shutdown, not to mention 730 billion for the military.
- House approval of the U.S. Space Force, a brand-new branch of the military. We are behind Russia and China in regards to a space-forc3e. This puts us on the right track. Would a Democrat President ever work for such a provision?
- Government family leave that will be a model for a proposal for the public. Here, we have yet another Democrat unkept promise - election after election - taken off the table by the President.
- Tentative agreement on trade with China. The business community sees this as a most significant agreement with more to come after the election.
- Approval of Trump’s 50th federal appeals judge. Tha's 50 Appelate Judeges in three years compared to 55 Appelate judges in 8 years for Obama.
- Confirmation of a new Food and Drug Administration chief.
- The signing of a pro-Israel anti-Semitism executive order. The President is all about protecting and supporting Israel.
GOP may have a new member:
Democratic impeachment holdout Jeff Van Drew planning to switch parties
— Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a moderate Democrat who is strongly opposed to
impeaching President Donald Trump, is expected to switch parties and
become a Republican, according to multiple sources familiar with the
situation.
Hillary in 2020? Well, this is believe: She will if the Party begs her to run.
Look, while she appears to be extremely ego-centric as I posit her possible future, the fact of the matter is this: Because of her past failings, she really needs to be "enlisted" by the Party . . . she will need that kind of support to even make "it" close.
She will not be asked if Biden's numbers continue to be what they are.
It is hard to believe that we still have nearly a full year to go before the election. But as things stand today, Biden will be the nominee. (But)We can only hope the nominee is Sanders or, to a lesser degree of hope, Warren. This editor sees these two losing by significant margins . . . . even Joe ?
She will not be asked if Biden's numbers continue to be what they are.
It is hard to believe that we still have nearly a full year to go before the election. But as things stand today, Biden will be the nominee. (But)We can only hope the nominee is Sanders or, to a lesser degree of hope, Warren. This editor sees these two losing by significant margins . . . . even Joe ?
2016 was to be the point of no return. Now, 3 years after 2016, the new date for cosmic doom is "12 years." BTW, it has been "12 years" for the past three years. Go figure.
ELEVEN YEARS AGO TODAY.
On December 13, 2008, junk scientist Al Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap would be completely ice free in five years.
Gore made the prediction to a German audience on December 13, 2008. Al warned them that “the entire North ‘polarized’ cap will disappear in 5 years.”video:
Former Vice President Al Gore references computer modeling to suggest that the north polar ice cap may lose virtually all of its ice within the next seven years. “Some of the models suggest that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years,” said Gore.In January 2006, Al Gore pushed the theory that “within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return” and “a true planetary emergency” due to global warming.
Evidence proving regional warming while dening "global" as an aspect of any warming trends.
Editor: Understand that "tide rise" is a critical element of Global Warming . . . no warming = no tide rise. With that fact in mind, you should know that no one is moving the financial districts off Manhattan Island. Resort and investment properties are still selling on the Coastlines of all our major cities. No one is moving from "ground zero" in the Orient, Hawaii, Guam, Portia Rico, or any of our major island communities. the shore line at the Panama Canal , opened in August of 1914, is the same, today, 105 years later ! Anyone remember Katrina? That was 2005. The next year was to be the beginning of the demonstrative warming cerise , scientists predicting as many a 15 Cat 5 hurricanes in the Gulf. At most, only one Cat % has been the case since Katrina. Several years ago, there were headlines pushing the heat wive in Spain . . . "proof of global warming." But France and Portugal had normal temps at the same time . . . . so how is this an proof of "global warming" when the example (Spain versus Portugal) only proves a regional circumstance that is "here today and gone tomorrow?"
Understand that the real danger to our world is a massive global cooling, as was the case just 12,000 years ago, a cooling/freezing time that covered all of existing Canada and extended in a come shaped fashion from the Northern Border into Texas.
Dec. 12, Pelosi admits she has been working on impeachment for 2 and a half years .
During a presser on Dec 12, Pelosi was asked as to why the rush for impeachment. As she was stumbled around for an answer, she finally admitted that there was no rush, that she had been working for impeachment for 2.5 years.
So, the Marxist Media has been pursuing biased, marixist reporting for three decades.
Back in 1987, Newsweek said "[T]he time for unbiased reporting is
over. We will 'culture' the reporting to bring the readers to a
conclusion we support". Time said the same thing about a week later.
Both lost over half their subscriptions almost immediately. Anyone
reading Newsweek or Time is reading anti-American propaganda
11 investigations. Trump has fully coporated with 11 - but the current House nonsense is one investigation too many.
- FBI investigation
- CIA investigation
- NSA investigation
- House Intelligence Committee investigation
- Special Counsel Robert Mueller investigation
- Senate Intelligence Committee investigation
- Senate Judiciary Committee investigation
- Department of Homeland Security investigation
- House Oversight and Government Reform Committee investigation
- DOJ Inspector General investigation
- IC Inspector General investigation
Lindsay and McConnell want an abbreviated impeachment trial.
Here is what the GOP can do to insure a trial occurs: McConnell plans on having a Senate vote to dismiss the Dems' charges. All that is needed is 4 or 5 Republicans votinng "no" with the minority on the McConnell/Graham amendment and the trial is on.
The GOP needs "equal time." This is not the time to be nice or mature. I don't think McConnell and Lindsay (both Patriot heros) can prevent a trial. Time will tell.
The GOP needs "equal time." This is not the time to be nice or mature. I don't think McConnell and Lindsay (both Patriot heros) can prevent a trial. Time will tell.
Timeline for DOD certification of Ukraine:
2017 Under an admittably corrupt government, the DOD certified Ukraine for receipt of US aid.
2018 Ditto.
2019: April 21, Zelinisky won the national election.
May 20: Zelinsky is sworn into office
May 23: DOD certifies Unkraine for U.S. assitance (just as it did during the corrupt
years of 2017 and 2018.
Understand the the Dems point to the DOD's certification on May 23; never mind previous certifications while Ukraine was in the midst of an extremely corrupt historicity; never mind that the new govenment (Zelinsky and company) had only been sworn into office on May 20, that moves to fight corruption had not had time to develop, that Trump had no way of knowing if Zelinsky would be like his predecessors , a possibility poisted in the following referenced article:
August 20, 2019 - https://www.fpri.org/article/2019/08/the-pendulum-of-ukrainian-politics-one-day-youre-in-the-next-day-youre-out/, an excellent "E article" was published laying out the fact that Ukraine had promised to fight corruption before without fulfilling its commitment to do so . . . on more than one occasion. The author made clear what had to be accomplished by the Ukraine Legislature. By September 3, Ukraine had passed into law significant anti-corruption legislation (negating a Ukraine law that gave immunity to its legislators). One week later, September 11, Trump release his hold on US assitance to Ukraine. None of this is ever mentioned by Trump's opponents.
Sept. 11, 2019, the hold on Ukrain'es assistance was lefted.
2018 Ditto.
2019: April 21, Zelinisky won the national election.
May 20: Zelinsky is sworn into office
May 23: DOD certifies Unkraine for U.S. assitance (just as it did during the corrupt
years of 2017 and 2018.
Understand the the Dems point to the DOD's certification on May 23; never mind previous certifications while Ukraine was in the midst of an extremely corrupt historicity; never mind that the new govenment (Zelinsky and company) had only been sworn into office on May 20, that moves to fight corruption had not had time to develop, that Trump had no way of knowing if Zelinsky would be like his predecessors , a possibility poisted in the following referenced article:
August 20, 2019 - https://www.fpri.org/article/2019/08/the-pendulum-of-ukrainian-politics-one-day-youre-in-the-next-day-youre-out/, an excellent "E article" was published laying out the fact that Ukraine had promised to fight corruption before without fulfilling its commitment to do so . . . on more than one occasion. The author made clear what had to be accomplished by the Ukraine Legislature. By September 3, Ukraine had passed into law significant anti-corruption legislation (negating a Ukraine law that gave immunity to its legislators). One week later, September 11, Trump release his hold on US assitance to Ukraine. None of this is ever mentioned by Trump's opponents.
Sept. 11, 2019, the hold on Ukrain'es assistance was lefted.
Gohmert reveals whistleblower; NBC pretends to morally object and all this about a man whose name hase been "out there" for months
NBC News:
GOP Rep. Gohmert publicly names person some Republicans say is whistleblower
This blog posted the name of the Whistleblower Oct. 31 of 2019. Click on the "whistleblower " label below.
This blog posted the name of the Whistleblower Oct. 31 of 2019. Click on the "whistleblower " label below.
Former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder sent a chilling message to U.S. Attorney John Durham: In part, here is that message:
Former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder sent a chilling message in a
very public way to U.S. Attorney John Durham–the man investigating
abuses by the FBI and Justice Department against President Trump and
members of his administration and campaign in the Russia-election
investigation–warning Durham he is risking his reputation.
Holder wrote an op-ed published Wednesday night by the Washington Post calling current Attorney General William Barr “unfit” to serve as attorney general. The threat to Durham iss buried in the op-ed, but jumps out like a dagger thrust from the dark.
Text taken from GatewayPundit, here.
Holder wrote an op-ed published Wednesday night by the Washington Post calling current Attorney General William Barr “unfit” to serve as attorney general. The threat to Durham iss buried in the op-ed, but jumps out like a dagger thrust from the dark.
…As a former line prosecutor, U.S. attorney and judge, I found it alarming to hear Barr comment on an ongoing investigation, led by John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, into the origins of the Russia probe. And as someone who spent six years in the office Barr now occupies, it was infuriating to watch him publicly undermine an independent inspector general report — based on an exhaustive review of the FBI’s conduct — using partisan talking points bearing no resemblance to the facts his own department has uncovered.Holder closes with his statement that Barr is ‘unfit’. His case is totally based on policy differences and his claimed understanding of the nature of the job, which is odd considering Holder once called himself Obama’s “wingman” when he served as his attorney general and called Obama “my boy”: “I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”
When appropriate and justified, it is the attorney general’s duty to support Justice Department components, ensure their integrity and insulate them from political pressures. His or her ultimate loyalty is not to the president personally, nor even to the executive branch, but to the people — and the Constitution — of the United States.
Career public servants at every level of the Justice Department understand this — as do leaders such as FBI Director Christopher A. Wray and Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Their fidelity to the law and their conduct under pressure are a credit to them and the institutions they serve.
Others, like Durham, are being tested by this moment. I’ve been proud to know John for at least a decade, but I was troubled by his unusual statement disputing the inspector general’s findings. Good reputations are hard-won in the legal profession, but they are fragile; anyone in Durham’s shoes would do well to remember that, in dealing with this administration, many reputations have been irrevocably lost.
This is certainly true of Barr, who was until recently a widely respected lawyer. I and many other Justice veterans were hopeful that he would serve as a responsible steward of the department and a protector of the rule of law.
Text taken from GatewayPundit, here.
Wanna bet Hunter comes out a big loser on his court fight against having to honor his responsibilities as a father?
Deadbeat Dad Hunter Biden Refuses to Pay Baby Mama Lunden Roberts’ $11,000 Legal Bill – And She’s Demanding He Admit How Much Burisma Paid Him!
And this all will come out during the election season. This will be a major problem for Father Joe and challenging Trump to a push-up contest will not work as a defense.
You can bet that tonights ralloy will be a real hell-raiser.
THOUSANDS
Line Up Hours Early in Rain to See President Trump – Line for
Chick-fil-A Has More People Than Any Dem Candidate’s Rally!
Here is a great article on the failings of Socialism, found in the Amican Thinkers
Socialism's Unbroken Trail of Failure
Evidence
that socialism is doomed to fail wherever it is tried occurred long
before America became a nation. In 1607, inhabitants of Jamestown,
Virginia were on the verge of starvation, largely because the
settlement's communal living arrangement failed to produce enough
food. Among the steps that saved Jamestown from oblivion was doing away
with communal sharing in favor of incentive-based farming that rewarded
personal initiative.
Pro Basketball ratings are down and its not just about China. Their opposition to America's greatness also fignures into their problems.
Me? I have no intention of watching the NBA this season - not for a single second. These American Haters can all go to hell.
Ashe Schow / The Daily Wire:
Ashe Schow / The Daily Wire:
NBA Ratings Are Down This Year And The Association Can't Figure Out Why. Here's A Theory.
— Ratings for NBA games are down across the three major networks that
show the games - ESPN, TNT, and NBA TV, and the National Basketball
Association isn't totally sure why. Here's a theory: China.
Turns out Warren was a corporate consultant, her indian Heritage claims are since 1986, and she made 2 million dollars last year . . . Warren a member of the Middle Class my a . .
Washington Post:
Memo from 1990s pollution case shows Elizabeth Warren in action as corporate consultant
— The memo from then-Professor Elizabeth Warren was written on Harvard
Law School letterhead, a symbol of gravitas for a scholar renowned as a
champion for consumers victimized by predatory banks and other big
businesses.
Breaking News: Elizabeth Warren Made Money Vogue· 1 day ago
That's it. What ... failed to say—the context it declined to provide—proved perhaps more interesting. Warren earned the $1.9 million sum, as revealed in ...
- Nov 28, 2017 · Original insult to Native Americans came from Warren herself: Varney. Let’s not forget that the original insult to Native Americans came from Elizabeth Warren herself. Applying for a job as a Harvard professor, she claimed to be a Native American. Harvard eagerly accepted her claim— they could tick off two boxes to show diversity: female and minority.
- Stuart Varney
headlines relating to the IG Report: The headlines tell the "rest of the story."
AG Bill Barr’s Statement Is Damning – “the Inspector General’s Report Reflects a CLEAR ABUSE of the FISA process”
Fox News: US Attorney Durham objects to IG findings on Russia probe origins in stunning statement
Rep. Ratcliffe Drops Bomb During Hearing – Says Schiff is Trying to Bury Evidence of Whistleblower’s Crimes in House SCIF (VIDEO)
“Details of Report are Worse Than Anything I Could Have Imagined” – President Trump Responds to IG Report on Deep State Spying on His Campaign (VIDEO)
The Hill: Horowitz report is damning for the FBI and unsettling for the rest of us
IG Report: FBI Official Higher Up Than Peter Strzok Involved in Opening “Crossfire Hurricane” to Spy on Trump
DOJ IG Determined That Steele’s Bogus Dossier Played ‘Central And Essential Role’ In Ordering Surveillance Of Carter Page. . . . . . . As it turns out, Page was not indicted on a single issue although 4 FISA warrants where issused against him. Turns out he was only a conduit into the Trump campaign.
IG Report: FBI Offered to Pay Christopher Steele “Significantly” to Dig Up Dirt on General Michael Flynn – FBI Ran an Op Against Flynn
DOJ IG Report on FISA Applications is Finally Released — AG Bill Barr BLASTS FBI: “Launched Intrusive Investigation of US Presidential Campaign”
JOHN SOLOMON: IG Report Lays Out “Incontrovertible Evidence” Obama FBI Misled FISA Court
ABC News: FBI Director Chris Wray reacts to DOJ watchdog report on Russia investigation: Exclusive
Gateway Pundit reviews Monday's Democrat hangman's trial:
The DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz finally released his report on FISA abuses on Monday.
The report revealed what we knew to be true all along — the FBI defrauded the FISA court and purposely omitted exculpatory information from the FISA judges in order to obtain FOUR FISA warrants on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.
Mr. Durham has already traveled to Italy and other countries as part of his sprawling investigation into how Obama’s corrupt FBI and intel agencies launched and carried out the largest spy operation of a presidential candidate in US history.
The report revealed what we knew to be true all along — the FBI defrauded the FISA court and purposely omitted exculpatory information from the FISA judges in order to obtain FOUR FISA warrants on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.
olitically motivated — and John Durham hit back.
US Attorney from Connecticut John Durham immediately released a statement following the release of the FISA report and disputed Horowitz’s findings and conclusions.“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened,” John Durham said in a rare statement.John Durham was tapped by Bill Barr earlier this year to conduct an investigation into the origins of Spygate.
Mr. Durham has already traveled to Italy and other countries as part of his sprawling investigation into how Obama’s corrupt FBI and intel agencies launched and carried out the largest spy operation of a presidential candidate in US history.
Bill Barr's comments agreeing with Durham's criticism of the I.G. report:
" . . . the malfeasance and misfeasance detailed in the Inspector General's report reflects a clear abuse of the FISA process.'
John Durham, US Attorney investigation the investigators had this to say following the rel3ease of trhe Horowitz report:
" . . . we advised the Inspector Generalk that we do not ageree with some of the report's conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened."
Predication is, in short, those elements that provided cause for openingand pursuing an investigation ~ editor
Scroll down for cmments made by the I.G.
Predication is, in short, those elements that provided cause for openingand pursuing an investigation ~ editor
Scroll down for cmments made by the I.G.
Justice Dept IG report includes these damning words:
That so many basic and fundamental errors were made by three separate handpicked teams on one o0f the most sensitive FBI investigations that was briefed to the highest levels within the FBI (e. Comey - editor) and that FBI officials expected would eventually be subjected to close scrutiny, raised significant questions regarding the FBI chain of commands's management and supervision of the FISA process."
After reading the following, what is the plan to improve on the Trump economy? Impeach the man who has given us this economy . . . . genius!
Job numbers released Friday show an increase of another 266,000 jobs! And the unemployment rate returns 3.5%. When the 41,000 jobs are added to the previous two months, we have more than 300,000 jobs created by the Trump economic strategies.
The White House continues to report that this economy could arguably be the best all time… because it is.
But when you dig down into the numbers you see the Trump
economy is helping minorities, non-college grads, and blue-collar
workers the most.
While the Dems think they are onto something nefarious, Trump shoves "nefarious" in their collective face.
Trump on Giuliani Trip To Ukraine: I Hear He’s
Found Plenty of Good Information, Wants to Report to Congress and
Attorney General
Probably on of the silliest charges against our President is the one that suggests he is in need of money and is diverting campaign money into his personal c.
Dan Alexander / Forbes:
Trump Has Now Shifted $1.7 Million From Campaign Donors To His Private Business
— The Trump campaign is spending big money at the president's
properties, according to a review of Federal Election Commission data.
Yet the records show that Donald Trump still has not donated any of his
own funds to the campaign.
So the multi-billionaire, the man who does not accept a penny of salary, is using his presidential position to make money. Never mind the millions and millions made by the Clintons and the Obama's as a direct result of their presidencies ~ editor
Corporate Media continues to drive the impeachment fantasy.
The Hill pretends that the impeachment/removal of the President includes Collins, Romney and Murkowski, and to a less degree of certainty, Sens. Rob Portman (Ohio), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Tim Scott (S.C.), Marco Rubio (Fla.), and Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), who is not seeking reelection.
This story is simply more evidence to the notion that the Marxist Media is driving the destruction of the Conservative Nation. President Trump is not facing a serious challenge to his Presidency in the Senate and virtually no one capable of objective thinking disagrees.
This story is simply more evidence to the notion that the Marxist Media is driving the destruction of the Conservative Nation. President Trump is not facing a serious challenge to his Presidency in the Senate and virtually no one capable of objective thinking disagrees.
After reading the Post headline below, you must admit that the impeachment saga has been orchestrated by the Marxist Media.
Margaret Sullivan / Washington Post:
Wall-to-wall impeachment coverage is not changing any minds. Here's how journalists can reach the undecided.
Look, news services do not orchestrate governmental coups or federal takeovers. They simply and profoundly report the news . . . not the news they, the media, create usch as takeovers or the simple minded public survey (i.e. national polls, etc.), but, what other people do to other people and states.
Look, news services do not orchestrate governmental coups or federal takeovers. They simply and profoundly report the news . . . not the news they, the media, create usch as takeovers or the simple minded public survey (i.e. national polls, etc.), but, what other people do to other people and states.
Trump at 52% in Rasmussen
Thursday, December 05, 2019
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday
shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job
performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove.
Never mind that this violates professional ethics, namely no true professional psychiatrist would ever consider pushing a prognoisis without first evaluating the (a) client in face to face counseling sessions.
A group of mental health professionals led by a trio of pre-eminent
psychiatrists is urging the House Judiciary Committee to consider Donald Trump’s
“dangerous” mental state arising from his “brittle sense of self-worth”
as part of its inquiry into whether to approve articles of impeachment against him.
“We are speaking out at this time because we are convinced that, as the time of possible impeachment approaches, Donald Trump has the real potential to become ever more dangerous, a threat to the safety of our nation,” said Yale Medical School Professor Dr Bandy Lee, George Washington University Professor Dr John Zinner, and former CIA profiler Dr Jerrold Post in a statement which will be sent to House Judiciary Committee members on Thursday.
The statement will be accompanied by a petition with at least 350
signatures from mental health professionals endorsing their
conclusions.
“We are speaking out at this time because we are convinced that, as the time of possible impeachment approaches, Donald Trump has the real potential to become ever more dangerous, a threat to the safety of our nation,” said Yale Medical School Professor Dr Bandy Lee, George Washington University Professor Dr John Zinner, and former CIA profiler Dr Jerrold Post in a statement which will be sent to House Judiciary Committee members on Thursday.
Think about this:
The radical Left is now complaining about the lack of color in the remaining panel of Democrat candidates.
I am thinking that if these clowns continue to bitch about this "lack of diversity," they just might give blacks a reason for not going to the polls in November of 2020
I am thinking that if these clowns continue to bitch about this "lack of diversity," they just might give blacks a reason for not going to the polls in November of 2020
Pretty Boy Trudeau makes a fool of himself and Trump refuses to play the political games of the Progressive socialist cabal.
Jon Sharman / The Independent:
Trump
calls Trudeau ‘two-faced’, cancels press conference and leaves Nato
summit early after video of world leaders making fun of him
— 'I called him out on the fact he's not paying 2 per cent, and I
guess he's not very happy about it,' says US president — Donald Trump
has reacted furiously
So many serious problems with this tail (and it is a trial).
The Dems are charging that Trump demanded an investigation into the Bidens, and in so doing , further the likelihood that he would win re-election.
But what if someone other than Joe Biden is chosen to run for President against Trump?
Obviously, there is no crime worthy of impeachment if someone else is chosen to run against him (Trump).
Of course, there was no investigation into the Bidens; there was no quid pro quo and all 12 witnesses before the Schiff lead House Committee agreed that there was actual quid pro quo. All were specifically asked about this, and, all agreed that no such event was in evidence. They were also asked about bridbery with the same results - - - i.e. "no bribery." Read the parts of each tanscribed testimoney at the point where the GOP representatitive spacifically asked about quid pro quo, or bribery or extortion and you will see that none of the 12 could give testimoney to the notion that the President was quilty of any of the above stated "crimes."
But what if someone other than Joe Biden is chosen to run for President against Trump?
Obviously, there is no crime worthy of impeachment if someone else is chosen to run against him (Trump).
Of course, there was no investigation into the Bidens; there was no quid pro quo and all 12 witnesses before the Schiff lead House Committee agreed that there was actual quid pro quo. All were specifically asked about this, and, all agreed that no such event was in evidence. They were also asked about bridbery with the same results - - - i.e. "no bribery." Read the parts of each tanscribed testimoney at the point where the GOP representatitive spacifically asked about quid pro quo, or bribery or extortion and you will see that none of the 12 could give testimoney to the notion that the President was quilty of any of the above stated "crimes."
The House Bill for Impeachment:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/breaking-house-democrats-release-impeachment-report/
Also, 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 GOP 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁:
1. President Trump has a deep-seated, genuine, and reasonable skepticism of Ukraine due to its history of pervasive corruption.
2. President Trump has a long-held skepticism of U.S. foreign assistance and believes that Europe should pay its fair share for mutual defense.
3. President Trump's concerns about Hunter Biden's role on Burisma's board are valid. The Obama State Department noted concerns about Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma in 2015 and 2016.
4. There is indisputable evidence that senior Ukrainian govt officials opposed President Trump in 2016 and did so publicly. It has been reported that a DNC operative worked with Ukrainian officials, including the Ukrainian Embassy, to dig up dirt on then-candidate Trump.
5. The evidence does not establish that President Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election for the purpose of benefiting him in the 2020 election.
6. The evidence does not establish that President Trump withheld a meeting with President Zelensky for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
Also, 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 GOP 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁:
1. President Trump has a deep-seated, genuine, and reasonable skepticism of Ukraine due to its history of pervasive corruption.
2. President Trump has a long-held skepticism of U.S. foreign assistance and believes that Europe should pay its fair share for mutual defense.
3. President Trump's concerns about Hunter Biden's role on Burisma's board are valid. The Obama State Department noted concerns about Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma in 2015 and 2016.
4. There is indisputable evidence that senior Ukrainian govt officials opposed President Trump in 2016 and did so publicly. It has been reported that a DNC operative worked with Ukrainian officials, including the Ukrainian Embassy, to dig up dirt on then-candidate Trump.
5. The evidence does not establish that President Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election for the purpose of benefiting him in the 2020 election.
6. The evidence does not establish that President Trump withheld a meeting with President Zelensky for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
7. The evidence does not support that President Trump withheld U.S. security assistance to Ukraine for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
8. The evidence does not support that President Trump orchestrated a
shadow foreign policy apparatus for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to
investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden,
or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
9. The evidence does not support that President Trump covered up the
substance of his telephone conversation with President Zelensky by
restricting access to the call summary.
10. President Trump's assertion of longstanding claims of executive
privilege is a legitimate response to an unfair, abusive, and partisan
process, and does not constitute obstruction of a legitimate impeachment
inquiry.
So Candidate Bloomberg will not allow negative reports on his own campaign, only on the Trump campaign. Here is what Trump is doing about this bit ofr hypocrisy:
Trump Campaign Will No Longer Credential Bloomberg News Reporters
Make no mistake, this kind of action is directed against all of the partiotic nation, period. If you believe that the war against Trump is only about Trump, you really have not been paying attention or, even worse, you do not care.
The Founders created the 1st Amendment to prevent this kind of action by the richand powerful so don't tell me that the Democrat Party cares about liberty or free speech or a fair political process.
300+ Trump Ads Taken Down By Google, YouTube
This is the very reason why the Founders made their first amendment to the Constitution about free political speech.
This is their agenda. All denials or "clarifications" to the contrary are nothing more than the series of lies told to hide their true course of action for a nation they did not create, for a nation they truly despise, for a Middle Class/Blue Collar constituency (70 - 80 million or more) they have ridiculed and hated since Viet Nam.
The plan of the modern-day subversive? To simply ignore our founding principles and documents, write their own agenda, use the U.N. and its treatise to circumvent our own legal and foundational documents, continue to legislate against our own national sovereignty, use any and all causes for the transfer of American wealth to those nations that, for the most part, hate us, criminalize or otherwise enslave the millions who disagree, and move on with their version of "a brave new world."
The good news? To date, elections still matter despite Progressive rejection of the 2016 election. Our federal court systems still work when properly balanced, and the Gallup poll still finds that our nation leans more to the Right than the pegan media wants us all to believe.
Why aren't we surprsised? Its been goiing on since before Reagan.
Understand that there is no other explanation for this kind of crap other than the corporate media is nothing more than a propaganda outlet using our search for "news" as bait.
Media Pulls UN Report After Finding Record-High Child Detentions Took Place Under Barack Obama not Trump (Video)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)