, ignoring the ruling class in the South in 1960 (they were all Democrats), pretends to blame the GOP for the sins of the early era Progressive.

Rebecca Onion,  at,  wrote this headline and gave us that test.  Two comments:  first,  the test could not be easier and,  (2),  the South was controlled and ruled by Democrats,  at that time.  This was a Democrat ploy.  Voter intimidation was a Democrat strategy and this test came from the mind of those within the Democrat Party,  we hated blacks.  

Obama continues to pretend he wants an immigration bill he could have had without a fight . . . . . and the foolish stand in line waiting for the parade.

Editor:  So this clown spends four years trashing the GOP,  refusing to meet with its leadership,  disgracing them in every speech,  and now,  he acts as if he has some sort of influence when he issues a directive "to get things down by such and such deadline."  Understand that the only reason we are dealing with immigration,  today,  is because he wanted this to be continuing election issue.  I know this,  beyond any doubt,  because in 2008,  he promised "to get immigration done" in his first year.  Knowing that he had a super-majority in both houses of congress,  that the GOP could not amend a bill written by Democrats much less stop its passage,  he chose to do nothing with regards to his promise.  

And the Hispanic leadership bought his lies and excuses.  Today they blame the GOP.  I ask you this:  do we really need a population so ignorant of political process that they have no idea what is going on   . . . . . .   do we need them in the GOP?  Good grief.  What a bunch of losers. 

What is amazing is that Obama is still up to his old tricks,  pretending to want something that he could have had without a fight,  and his legion of followers happily jump into line and praise his name.   

Obama warned us of his disdain for the coal industry. Problem: he is 20 years before giving us a reliable alternative but he fails to understand the import of that fact. (see the video)

Sarah on Facebook blasts the RINO Herd and suggests she is not far from leaving the GOP.

Update: 3,552,989 liked this.

Please take a look at the article linked below to understand how the amnesty bill the Senate passed yesterday is a sad betrayal of working class Americans of every ethnicity who will see their wages lowered and their upward mobility lowered too. And yet we still do not have a secured border. This Senate-approved amnesty bill rewards lawbreakers and won’t solve any problems – as the CBO report notes that millions of more illegal immigrants will continue to flood the U.S. in coming years.

Great job, GOP establishment. You’ve just abandoned the Reagan Democrats with this amnesty bill, and we needed them to “enlarge that tent” of which you so often speak. It’s depressing to consider that the House of Representatives is threatening to pass some version of this nonsensical bill in the coming weeks.

Once again, I’ll point out the obvious to you: it was the loss of working class voters in swing states that cost us the 2012 election, not the Hispanic vote. Legal immigrants respect the rule of law and can see how self-centered a politician must be to fill this amnesty bill with favors, earmarks, and crony capitalists’ pork, and call it good. You disrespect Hispanics with your assumption that they desire ignoring the rule of law.

[Understand that the total Hispanic vote is less than 8% of the total electoral vote.  She is correct.  The GOP did not lose the election because of the Hispanic vote. ~  blog editor]

Folks like me are barely hanging on to our enlistment papers in any political party – and it’s precisely because flip-flopping political actions like amnesty force us to ask how much more bull from both the elephants in the Republican Party and the jackasses in the Democrat Party we have to swallow before these political machines totally abandon the average commonsense hardworking American. Now we turn to watch the House. If they bless this new “bi-partisan” hyper-partisan devastating plan for amnesty, we’ll know that both private political parties have finally turned their backs on us. It will then be time to show our parties’ hierarchies what we think of being members of either one of these out-of-touch, arrogant, and dysfunctional political machines.

- Sarah Palin

Palin blasts Rubio; likens him to Judas

Text and layout from You should know that Obama knew,  full well,  that he has helped to down grade Rubio's chances at running for president in attempting to buddy-up to him.  


After reports that President Obama called Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) to congratulate him on the passage of the immigration reform bill in the Senate – Rubio did not answer the call – former Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) blasted Rubio:

Try to find a current article on the Web about the NSA leak scandal. Here are the first two pages of a Google search on "NSA leaks." Obama has ordered a military block-aid of all such news articles. A "first" in American history . . . . and the military is his willing slave.

  1. Blackout: Defense Department Blocks All Articles About NSA Leaks ... › News › Washington Whispers
    8 hours ago – If any website posts information deemed classified, it will be blocked.
  2. U.S. Army blocks The Guardian news website after NSA leaks - San ...
    6 hours ago – Presidio of Monterey employees are blocked on the base s network from accessing parts of the news website that recently broke stories about ...
  3. Army reportedly blocking all access to Guardian coverage of NSA ...
    20 hours ago – The Army is blocking all access to The Guardian newspaper's reports about the National Security Agency's sweeping collection of data about ...
  4. Army reportedly blocking military access to Guardian ... - NBC News
    20 hours ago – The Army is blocking all access to The Guardian newspaper's reports about the National Security Agency's sweeping collection of data about ...
  5. Report: Army restricts access to newspaper that broke stories on ...
    6 hours ago – ... news website, the news organization that broke the story on leaks of... Army restricts access to newspaper that broke stories on NSA leak.
  6. News Article: Leaks Damage National Security, NSA ...
    Leaks Damage National Security, NSA Director Says. By Claudette Roulo American Forces Press Service. WASHINGTON, June 28, 2013 – Recent media leaks ...
  7. The Army really doesn't want soldiers reading about the NSA leaks ...
    1 hour ago – From Yahoo! News: And liberal critics are steamed.
  8. Defense Officials Indicate NSA Leaks Have Had Consequences : NPR › News › US › National Security
    14 hours ago – GREENE: And officials in Washington say the Snowden leaks are threatening ... In a newspaper interview last week, Snowden said the NSA is ...
  9. Army Blocks Newspaper Website With NSA Leaks | NBC Bay Area › news › local
    1 day ago – The Army is blocking access to The Guardian newspaper's coverage about the National Security Agency's collection of Americans' emails and ...
  10. US Army Block Access To The Guardian's Website Over NSA Leaks
    8 hours ago – New submitter crashcy writes "According to a spokesman for the U.S. Army, the military organization is 'blocking all access to The Guardian ...

    1. Al Qaeda Has Changed How It Talks Since the NSA Leaks, but How ...
      2 days ago – From Yahoo! News: Following the Edward Snowden leaks that detailed a large part of the process by which the U.S. government's largest ...
    2. US Army Block Access To The Guardian's Website Over NSA Leaks
      8 hours ago – New submitter crashcy writes "According to a spokesman for the U.S. Army, the military organization is 'blocking all access to The Guardian ...
    3. New NSA leaks show email surveillance under Obama — RT USA
      1 day ago – Keep up with the news by installing RT's extension for . ... NSA leaks ...According to two leaked NSA documents published by The Guardian on ...
    4. Defense Department Blocks Access to Guardian News Website to ...
      21 hours ago – A memo sent out to Defense Department security contractors by Undersecretary of Defense security director Timothy A.
    5. Army restricts access to The Guardian in the wake of NSA leaks | Ars ...
      18 hours ago – New leak shows NSA harvests To, From, and BCC lines of e-mail data... This is not the first time the military has blocked access to a news ...
    6. US Army restricts access to Guardian website over secrets in NSA ...
      16 hours ago
      Keep up with the news by installing RT's extension for . ... NSA leaks ... that access to The Guardian ...
    7. Gen. Alexander: NSA leaks hurt anti-terrorism efforts - The ...
      8 hours ago
      A two-minute mashup including remarks NSA Director Keith ...Wednesday about surveillance programs and ...

Obama's win-lose Supreme Court record is the worst in American history . . . . . . . thought he was some sort of Constitutional expert. Apparently not.

You should know that in a PDF record,  we learn that the Federal Government’s historical win-lose record in the High Court is 70%.  Now that we have a “constitutional expert” in Hussein Obama,  we would expect that record to improve,  or, at least,  hold its own as regards  historical comparisons.  But that is not the case.

Obama’s Administration’s misuse of the US Constitution is front and center when his record is documented.  In the 24 Court decisions involving the Obama Administration,  15 were decided against this Administration and several of those were by 9-0 margins.  His winning percentage is 37%,  nearly half the winning average of his processors.    

Even in some of his “victories,” the Court’s decision was not absolute.  For example,  we all know that the Court upheld ObamaCare as a tax on the people.  What many do not know,  is that the Court,  in this decision,  also determined that the several states could not be forced to receive Medicare patients coming to them because of ObamaCare,  nor could the several states be penalized in any way for refusing to set up or run the state insurance exchanges mandated under ObamaCare.  As a result,  33 states have refused to participate in the “exchange” process at any level.  As a result,  ObamaCare, scheduled to be up and functioning by October of this year,  will not meet that deadline.  In fact,  no one knows when these exchanges will be functional.   

My point?  Even in “victory,”  Obama’s track record with the High Court is the worst in American history.  His record indicates one of the most abusive Administrations of all time,  abusive in its blatant disregard for Constitutional Law.  

The Supreme Court's decision on Prop 8 and federal benefits paid to gay couples put into context.

 The recent Supreme Court decision,  detailed in the news release below,  is no big deal,  in and of itself.  It simply orders the qualification for federal benefits to gay couples.  Most of those benefits were available to gays as individuals.  The decision does not order gay marriage,  nation wide but might be a first step in that direction. 

Look,  gays constitute not more than 3% of the population.  Our genetic code in 97% of the remaining population dictates heterosexual behavior . . . . . .  nothing these folks can do about that. 

The High Courts decision as to California’s Prop 8 decision is far more concerning.  The people of California passed Prop 8 by nearly 70% of the vote,  but the Democrat controlled state leaders,  along with the State’s Attorney General,  refused to defend the law when it went to court.  In refusing to hear the case,  the Supreme Court determined that the “people of California” have no legal standing to challenge the State’s action.    Understand that all a Democrat congress has to do to oppose the will of the people is to refuse to enforce the law.  If they do,  according to the Supremes,  the people have no legal recourse.  Still think we are free to govern ourselves? 

 (Reuters) – The Supreme Court’s ruling on Wednesday that same-sex couples are eligible for federal benefits will mean more gays and lesbians can reap the benefits of President Barack Obama’s healthcare overhaul that take effect January 1, advocates say.  In a landmark decision, the court effectively legalized same-sex marriage in California and struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which denied same-sex couples federal benefits such as healthcare.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act already bans discrimination in health coverage based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The law, known as “Obamacare,” was passed in 2010 and upheld by the Supreme Court nearly a year ago.

With the Supreme Court decision, same-sex couples who live in states that recognize them can apply for the law’s tax subsidies, meant to offset healthcare costs, as a couple rather than as two individuals, said Tim Jost, a health law expert and law professor at Washington and Lee University. This will help the law reach more people, he added.

Obama threatens those who would shelter Snowden, and then, Thursday, backs down from those warnings . . . . . just like we ALL knew he would.

Take it to the bank,  “capitulation” is the center piece to Obama’s foreign policy when it comes to dealing with strong and evil.  Just three days ago,  Obama was telling Russian,  China and Ecuador,  “You had better think seriously about what you are doing” in not surrendering Snowden to US authorities.  Implied threats were abundant,  while those of us at home,  were wondering just what he meant with such threatening tones.  We already knew that the “red line” in Syria meant nothing to Obama  . . . .  . just talk and nothing more. In addition to this failure,  he walked away from a victory in Iraq,  making a mockery of the Statis of Forces Treatise we had with that country and has allowed Iraq to be over run with Iranian jihadists. More than this,  he fought a losing war in Afghanistan,  sending 1,500 troops to their deaths for absolutely nothing.  

And now,  his most recent threats have melted away;  Obama pretending that Mr.  Snowden was just another “hacker.”  No doubt,  someone in his staff,  realized that the Administration has done nothing to reset relationships with the Russians;  that it snubbed China’s First Couple two weeks ago;  that it has absolutely no leverage whatsoever.  As an American,  I am thoroughly embarrassed as I watch this know nothing issue empty threats as if our enemies can see the cowardice in his bluster.    

"I am interested in making sure that the rules of extradition are obeyed," said Obama. "Now, we don't have an extradition treaty with Russia, which makes it more complicated. You don't have to have an extradition treaty to resolve some of these issues. There have been some useful conversations that have taken place between the United States government and the Russian government, and my continued expectation is that Russia or other countries that have talked about potentially providing Mr. Snowden asylum recognize that they are part of an international community and that they should be abiding by international law. And we'll continue to press them as hard as we can to make sure that they do so. But let me -- one last thing because you asked the final question. No, I'm not going to be scrambling jets to get a 29-year-old hacker."

Obama went on to argue that we have important and deep financial ties to China and Russia and implied that it would be silly to put those “relationships” in doubt for the sake of Mr. Snowden. 

Understand that Snowden is not a hacker.  He worked for the NSA and stole hundreds if not thousands of secret documents,  detailing all those who are being spied upon by the United States,  including all of its citizenry. 

The minority party in Texas, currently, is the Democrat Party. Because they lost the last election and are not the elected majority, they clearly believe they have the right rule by means of anarchy.

Remember Wisconsin and those Democrat politicians who ran across the Illinois border in an effort to shut down  State government ?  Mob rule was their tactic.  In the end,  it did not work,  but they abandoned the legislative process in favor of anarchy.  

Yesterday,  in Texas,  these same Democrat Anarchists chanted and cheered until the Texas State Congress had to dismiss for the day,  preventing a scheduled vote.  Nothing wrong with filibuster,  but mob rule and anarchy are not acceptable, especially in a nation of law's and a certain level of collective intelligence. 

They (the Marxist Social Order among us) boycott businesses to the point of ruin,  businesses that stand against their socialist/One World/secular agenda.  When they had the opportunity for one party rule (2009-2010),  that was exactly what they did,  forgetting their complaints against one party rule during the Bush years.  Of course,  there was no one party rule,  back then,  but they whined and complained,  anyway.  And,  again,  when they had the opportunity to legally ignore the other party,  because of the 2008 election,  they did so.  One party rule is not wrong if practiced by the nation's socialist/communist/Marxist alliance that is ruining this nation.  "They" do not believe in compromise,  unless it can extracted from the other party. And,  sadly,  they will use a compromised media,  mob rule, physical threats,  intentional lies and deception,  boycotts, and street riots,  to get their way.