Now Jenner wants a female voice. I could make a joke of voice change due to being kicked in the crotch, but that would be unseemly . . . so I won't.

What is the difference between a socialist and a Democrat? There is no difference and "they" do not want to admit it. See the video of DNC chairwoman fail in her explanation.

The video is worth the listening,  but,  if you must,  go to 50 seconds on the video dial,  and take note of Shultz's pathetic effort at establishing a difference   . . . . .    and to think that Bill O'Reilly,  at Fox News,  does not think the Dems are "socialists." 

Intelligent life "elsewhere?" Pope says, "Maybe not." Agreed.

Yahoo News,  as worthless a "news network" as created by mankind,  is telling us that the Vatican does not anticipate seeing alien (as in "outer space") communication anytime soon.  (story line,  here).  

Me?  I say,  "In view of the fact that we have no actual evidence intelligent life,   tells us that we,  here on Earth,  are the only version of intelligent life in all of the Grand Universe."  Conclusion?  The Pope may be right.  

Look,  all this talk about the intelligent life,  elsewhere,  is just silliness.  Now,  I am not saying that it cannot be,  but I am saying,  "There is no reason to believe,  otherwise."  

We have been looking for intelligent communication,  outside out solar system,  for decades.  Nothing.  One would think ,  the second we turned on those huge radio-wave receivers, in that very instant,  we would have some sort of messaging for Far Away.    As it stands,  today,  it looks as if we are looking for a first time, communication from an extant civilization hundreds of thousands of light years away.  What a waste of time. 

Did you know the US army cannot fight a two front war and may not be able to fight a single front war without a draft?

As you consider the headline and the following excerpt,  know this:  A "draftee" army is extremely inept when it comes to actually picking up a gun and waging war.  Close to 60% of those fighting in WW II and Viet Nam did not want to be in those wars and did all they could to hide and move away from "the fight" in efforts to avoid death or injury.  In a volunteer army,  such as we have today,  a fighting force,  on the ground,  of 100,000 willing men and women,  is as effective as a drafted army of 300,000 soldiers and the casualties to a volunteer army is far less than to a drafted force.  With all the negative talk coming from the Left,  about the Iraqi War under Bush,  we have all lost sight of the absolute fact that 4,000 dead,  in a five year war (2003 - 2008) is the lowest total in the history of war,  ever.  And,  this is true as you roll the wounded into the casualty totals   . . . . . . .    still,  the lowest number in the history of War.  

Feel sorry for our fighting force?  Hate the fact that so many are having to deal with their injuries and PTSD?  Keep the military's fighting force,  "volunteer."    And the comparison of "volunteer" to "draftee" is not even close.  To disagree is to argue out of pure ignorance ~ editor.

(From the USA Today story):   The Army's top officer for recruiting, Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Snow, acknowledged in an interview with USA TODAY, here,  on Thursday the difficulties in attracting young men and women to the active-duty Army in an improving economy and the greater effort his recruiters are taking to find new soldiers.

"It is a challenging mission, and we're not going to get around that," Snow said. "And there are indications that the economy is going to continue to improve.   "Snow, who took command this summer, expressed confidence that recruiters would hit the goal of 59,000 new recruits when the fiscal year ends Sept. 30.

The shortfall in recruiting comes as the Army is planning to pare 40,000 soldiers from its ranks over the next few years. Despite that reduction to 450,000 men and women, the Army still needs about 60,000 young recruits a year to fill out its combat and support units.

Federal judge is getting more than angry. Bad news for Lerner and the IRS cover-up.

Judicial Watch:   Judicial Watch announced that U.S District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan today threatened to hold the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department attorneys in contempt of court after the IRS failed to produce status reports and newly recovered emails of Lois Lerner, former director of the Exempt Organizations Unit of the IRS, as he had ordered on July 1, 2015.

How many times have I written that "we are winning?" Here is an article from Newsweek touting the immediate future for American Exceptionalism and its inclusion in our new school textbooks . . . . . . while the guy who hates the concept is still President !!!

The company behind Advanced Placement courses for U.S. high school students will release a revision to the standards for AP U.S. history on Thursday morning, after significant pushback from conservatives who claimed the redesigned course framework, released last year, painted American history in too negative a light.

The new framework significantly pares down last year’s framework, simplifying and condensing the course’s Thematic Learning Objectives from 50 to 19, according to an official at the College Board, the nonprofit organization that administers AP exams. In the process, a new section on the concept of “American exceptionalism” has been added. Some names that were omitted from last year’s framework, such as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, have been added—a key sticking point for critics of the prior document, who objected to Founding Fathers being omitted and negative aspects in American history being more emphasized, they claimed, than positive periods. Ben Carson, a GOP presidential candidate, said the curriculum was so anti-American that students who complete it would be “ready to sign up for ISIS.”

The revised framework will be effective immediately, and doesn’t require a change in any textbooks, according to the College Board. High school classes in many parts of the country begin in three weeks. Teachers Newsweek spoke with say that AP tests are typically written a year in advance, and said they expected the test will be reviewed in light of the changes. According to College Board, however, the test has not yet been written.

Source:  Newsweek

Never heard of Carmille? Me neither - but I suspect she will become more familiar to you over the coming months.

A well respected "contrarian" feminist and lesbian author,  Carmille Paglia,  is not overly impressed with Hillary.  You may enjoy her comment/analysis on Hillary,  below:  

 Paglia (on Hillary): 
"If you don’t have an effective public persona, if you’re not a good speaker, if you don’t like to press the flesh, if you’re not nimble enough to deal with anything that comes along, then you are not a natural politician!  And you sure aren’t going to learn it in your late 60s!  Get off the stage, and let someone else truly electable on! All this silly talk about how wonderful Hillary is in private.  Oh, sure, she’s nice to the important people and the people she wants or needs something from!  Then she’s Pollyanna herself!  There are just too many reports stretching all the way back to Arkansas about Hillary’s nasty outbursts toward underlings when things aren’t going well.  The main point is that the ability to communicate with millions of people is a special talent, and Hillary pretty obviously lacks it."      

Source:  Salon, here.  

Who is she?  

Wikipedia has a good write-up.  I do not know this woman,  but this past week,  I have noticed that she is in the news,  often.  She appears to be well received in the liberal ranks,  but is,  herself,  very much an independent,  "contrarian libertarian."   You will like much of what she says,  and a disagree on a number of issues.  She is clearly not impressed with Hillary.  ~ editor

From Wikipedia: 

Camille Anna Paglia (/ˈpɑːliə/; born April 2, 1947) is an American academic and social critic. Paglia, a self-described dissident feminist,[1] has been a professor at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, since 1984.[2] The New York Times has described her as "first and foremost an educator".[3]

She is the author of Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson (1990) and a collection of essays, Sex, Art, and American Culture (1992). Her other books and essays include an analysis of Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds, and Break, Blow, Burn (2005) on poetry. Her most recent book is Glittering Images (2012). She is a critic of American feminism and of post-structuralist theory as well as a commentator on multiple aspects of U.S. social culture such as its visual art, music, and film history.

Paglia is known for her critical views of many aspects of modern culture, including feminism and liberalism.[4][5] She has been characterized variously as a "contrarian academic" and a feminist "bête noire,"[6][7] a "witty controversialist,"[8] and a maverick,[9] Margaret Wente has called Paglia "a writer in a category of her own... a feminist who hates affirmative action; an atheist who respects religion" and "a Democrat who thinks her party doesn't get it."[10] Martha Duffy writes that Paglia "advocates a core curriculum based mostly on the classics" and rails against "chic French theorists Michel Foucault and Jacques Lacan," and "has a strong libertarian streak — on subjects like pornography — that go straight to her '60s coming-of-age."[6] Elaine Showalter has called Paglia a "radical libertarian," noting her socially liberal stands on abortion, sodomy, prostitution, drug use, and suicide. Paglia has denounced feminist academics and women's studies, celebrated popular culture and Madonna, and become a media celebrity, writing op-eds and gossip columns, appearing on television and telling her story to journalists.[11]
Paglia has said that she is willing to have her entire career judged on the basis of her composition of what she considers to be "probably the most important sentence that she has ever written": "God is man's greatest idea."[12]

Hillary, Champion of the Middle Class (???), wears $2000 ensembles and spends $600 for a hair cut.

FreeBeacon:    Hillary Clinton recently received a haircut priced at $600 from a stylist at the John Barrett Salon inside of Bergdorf Goodman in New York City.

Here is what I know about the coming 2016 elections:

<<<  He wants this for his legacy?  Seriously?  

If the Dems cannot win back the Senate and loose the WH,  the criticism of Obama will be deafening.  He can claim all the crap he wants,  as "legacy."  What will not be debatable,  as legacy, however,  is the after-election thinking of Dems should they lose another election,  this time,  the national election.  

Here is a brief history of the last three elections:  

2010 mid-terms:  landslide for Congressional Republicans.  

2012 presidential elections:  Obama wins but with 3.5 million fewer votes than in 2008.  Romney garnered a million more votes than McCain,  btw.  Keep in mind that GW Bush,  in his re-election,  took in 12 million more votes than in 2000  . . . . .   again,  Obama lost 3.4 million votes.  If you are a Democrat,  you have to be worried or brain-dead. 

2014 mid-terms:  one of the most one-sided midterms in American history,  leaving the Dems in their weakest state since 1928.  

And all of this while the GOP has historically bad polling numbers.  

I say,  if Obama continues to run his mouth  (and he can't help himself on that),  continues to force his agenda on the American people,  and injects himself into the coming election cycle,  the 2016 elections could further decimate the Democrat Party.  

Did she really say this?

She is talking about after the 2012 elections. Did she really say this?  Good grief,  all you have to do is look at Obama's actions and total disregard for Congress and you know that Jarrett frames what post-2012 Obama is all about.  Good for Obama.  Hell to pay for Hillary. 

Trump as President? Would not be the end of the world. I mean, he would be replacing Mr. One World Obama.

 Editor's notes:  The GOP field does not like Trump simply and profoundly because he has gone to the Temple,  and upset the tables of all the money changers.  Will he survive the debates?  Don't know,  but if he looks good in the debates,  I have to believe that he just might be the last man standing when it comes to election day,  2016.  Hillary cannot beat this guy without a massive, Obama scale, turnout  . . . . . .  something that looks rather bleak,  right now  (talking about turn out).  I mean,  when Bernie Sanders is kicking her butt in terms of turn out,  you know the woman is in trouble.   

Trump's lead GROWS over Jeb and other Republican rivals as he captures 25 per cent in new Reuters poll – just in time to leave the US for golf tournament in Scotland

  • Trump picked up nearly 10 points in the national poll of Republican voters since Friday
  • He's risen to 25 per cent support, with Jeb Bush in a distant second place at 12 per cent 
  • Trump is leaving the U.S. Wednesday night for Scotland, where his Trump Turnberry Resort will host the Women's British Open golf tourney
  • Trump flies to Glasgow Prestwick Airport aboard his private Boeing 757 and returns on Saturday 
  • Separate poll released earlier Wednesday shows Trump leading in Florida, where Jeb Bush was governor 

B Obama, with absolutely no military service, background or education, chose to ignore his generals . . . . . again.

AYOTTE: “Just to be clear, when you came before the committee then you said under no circumstances should we relieve pressure on Iran on those issues. So was it your military recommendation that we not agree to lifting of those sanctions?”
GENERAL DEMPSEY: “Yes. And I used the phrase “As long as possible.” And then that was the point at which the negotiation continued. But, yes, that was my military advice.”

Editor's 2003 VTX 1800 (Honda) in June of 2011. I got the bike in April of 2010. It did 0 - 60 in 4.8 secs back in the day and 40,000 miles ago. Trust me, It is my bad ass pride and joy.

Proof that merry-ju-wanna actually kills brain cells . . . . conclusive and undeniable.

Cosby:  35 accusers with no one taking back their claim for criminal rape.  Trump:  1 "accuser" who made it clear,  at the time (18 years ago) that she was not talking about "criminal rape,"  and later denied that it was rape at all,  that she (Trump's first wife) and Donald are good friends and have been partners in the raiser of their children.  In other words,  the Rolling Stoned article is nothing but a piece of white-trash journalism that should have never seen the light of day.   BUT,  since the mentally impaired,  drug infested, losers on the Left have nothing to say on the issues,  they feel the need to run their mouths,  24/7,  decade after decade,  with lies and innuendos.  Of course,  they cry like babies when anyone dares to fight fire with fire.  

Finding an excuse to ignore both the law and Congress is the hallmark of this Administration. Today, Kerry is on record making a statement that allows Administrative lawlessness to continue as a matter of policy.

Editor's notes:  The Obama Administration has no intentions of obeying a Congressional veto override,  should that happen.  If that was untrue,  Kerry would have simply said, "Yes,  absolutely yes."  He did not do that.  Are there no Democrats left who believe in the rule of law?  
While testifying before the House of Representatives on the Obama administration’s nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran, Secretary of State John Kerry would not commit to following the law should Congress override a threatened presidential veto.

Congressman Brad Sherman (D-CA) asked what the administration would do if Congress overrides a veto and rejects the deal. “You strongly do not want us to override a presidential veto, but if we do that triggers certain American laws,” Sherman asked, “I’d like to give you an opportunity — you don’t want us to do it, you think it’s terrible policy, you think the rest of the world would be against us — but lets say Congress doesn’t take your advice, we override a veto. And the law that’s triggered then imposes certain sanctions. Will you follow the law even though you think it violates this agreement clearly and even if you think it’s absolutely terrible policy?”

Secretary Kerry said he could not answer that question. “I can’t begin to answer that at this point without consulting with the president and determining what the circumstances are,” he responded.
Sherman interrupted, asking, “So, you’re not committed to following the law if you think it’s a bad law?”

One of these flags stands for more than war; the other is all about war . . . . and needs to be vanquished for that reason. Period.

The simple-minded Southern Democrat wing of the GOP insists on driving around,  during school recess,  with the confederate battle flag of Virginia,  waving in the breeze as they drive by black weddings and birthday parties.  

The flag on the right IS the national flag of the Confederacy.  The flag on the left is the battle flag for Virginia.  The battle flag is ONLY about war and rebellion and racism  . . . . . . .   period.  It means,  "We are going to kill you if we can't have our plantations."  

It does not belong to our Yankee society.  If they want a symbol that reminds of the good things of the South,  it is the Confederate National Flag,  not the flag they followed into battle.  It is the National Confederate Flag that belongs in our museums,  not the battle flag of a Southern Democrat rebellion. 

Yesterday (July 28) we had a story of 7 pick-ups,  each carrying the war flag,  doing a drive-by of a black birthday party,  with the brain dead occupants threatening to kill blacks.  

Does the use of that flag always mean the folks want to kill blacks???  No,  of course not.  But who can tell the difference with confidence?  I mean,  how do the neighbors KNOW that the Southern Democrat punks are not out on a dangerous rampage?  How do they KNOW ?  And that is why it must be condemned.  

Look,  if you are having a party and these Confederate Punks are seen driving your way,  coming down the street in their junk pick-ups,  you have no choice but to run and hide  and that makes this more than wrong,  it makes it a terror event. 

End of argument.  Don't like my conclusion?  Go to hell,  in a handbasket,  in a hurry   . . . . . . .   and take it personal.   

Border News: There is an increase in border crossings, but, illegal crossings are down 48% from this time last year. Maybe the border is not the campaign issue that wins the presidency for the GOP.

A local TV news station on the southern border makes this report:  
A year ago thousands of families illegally crossed into the United States.    

Border Patrol agents confirmed they have seen a slight increase in the number of people illegally crossing the border.   Along the Rio Grande River, anticipation begins to set in for Border Patrol agents for the possibility of a second wave. “We’re planning. You know, the Border Patrol is certainly planning,” Rio Grande Valley Acting Sector Chief Raul Ortiz said.

They said they’re still well below last year’s surge. Apprehensions are 48 percent lower than last fiscal year. “We’ve apprehended about 118,000 people this year,” Ortiz said. “Yet, we’re still the busiest sector in the country.”   Border Patrol is catching about 3,100 people a week. Federal authorities also confirmed holding cells are still well below capacity.

Editor's notes:   Question:   In what communities are crimes due to illegal migration at all time lows?  Answer:    L.A. and New York.  What do these communities have in common?  These are the largest populations of  Hispanic illegal immigration.  

 Does this fact make illegal immigration "ok?"  Absolutely not.  But we do need to fight the battle based on confirmed facts,  no?  So what is wrong, in general and apart from the immigration of felons,  with illegal immigration?  First,  it is "illegal" immigration.  Secondly,  these folks need to work.   As a consequence,  they add to the workforce,  in this country,  that is hardest hit with unemployment.  Third: to allow for protected illegal immigration is to make a mockery of our laws.  More than this, it takes away the need to legislate corrections in the law.  If folks are allowed to ignore the law without penalty,  why make corrections that may or may not be obeyed.   Chaos and lawlessness that is made systemic,  can never be considered acceptable. 

Could be a most interesting campaign season. See what Trump thinks of Sarah Palin.

This sort of crap needs to stop immediately. This is a terrorist act and needs to be prosecuted on a Federal level . . . . or good old country boys need to teach these clowns a lesson. Either way.

   <<< This proud Yankee conservative says,  its time to put this flag on ice.  If we cannot control its use,  it is no more free speech than screaming "fire" in a crowded theater   . . . .   period.  Why did we allow this battle symbol to continue after the war?  We kicked their butts.  That should have been the end of the matter.   

Terrifying moment a black child's birthday party was interrupted by 'armed' white men carrying Confederate flags 'shouting n-word death threats'


  • Seven pickup trucks with flags arrived at party in Douglasville, Georgia
  • Owner of house said that men threatened violence and were armed
  • Police, sued for racism last year, arrested one man on unrelated charges 

Blog Editor
 A black child's birthday party in Georgia was interrupted by a group of men driving pickup trucks with Confederate flags who were allegedly armed and threatening violence.

Video of the incident showed at least seven trucks with both Confederate and American flags driving past the outraged party-goers in Douglasville on Saturday.
A woman who posted a second video says that one of the white truck drivers, who she alleged were armed, said he would 'kill y’all [N-words]'. 

These video's were made back in 2013. No telling how many such reports have been made, well before abortion mill leadership was made aware of any ongoing expose'. Can anyone say, "Death by a thousand cuts."

For 6 months, Holly O’Donnell’s job was to identify pregnant women at Planned Parenthood who met criteria for fetal tissue orders and to harvest the fetal body parts after their abortions.

As if the first two videos involving fetal organ harvesting and haggling over price weren’t vile enough, yet another video has gone public from the Center For Medical Progress. This one looks to be the first of a new angle on the series, entitled “Human Capital. Episode 1: Planned Parenthood’s Black Market In Baby Parts“, and it takes on more of a documentary type of feel.

This episode feature the story of Holly O’Donnell, a phlebotomist-turned-whistleblower who was looking for work drawing blood, “I thought I was going to be just drawing blood, not procuring tissue from aborted fetuses“, as she applied for a job with a company called Stem Express. O’Donnell says that Stem Express didn’t even tell her what job would entail during her interview. She later learned that they hire procurement techs to “draw blood and dissect dead fetuses, and sell the parts to researchers. They partner with Planned Parenthood and they get part of the money.”

We were asked to procure certain tissues, like brain, liver, sinus, pancreas, heart, lungs, and pretty much anything on the fetus. It’s basically a huge trafficking of fetal tissues” she reveals. “They weren’t looking for a compassionate individual, at all. They were just looking for someone who could get as much money, as many samples. I think that’s why they were interested in me, as a phlebotomist, cause I can draw quick… They wanted someone who could get the numbers up.

Did you know that not a single winner of the New Hampshire primary has gone on to win a presidential election . . . . ever. So, do not panic if Trump wins N.H. In the end, he will actually have to talk about policy instead of simply killing off his competition.

Taegan Goddard / Political Wire:
Trump Holds Big Lead in New Hampshire  —  A new Monmouth poll in New Hampshire finds Donald Trump leading the GOP presidential race with 24%, followed by Jeb Bush at 12%, John Kasich at 7%, Scott Walker at 7%, Marco Rubio at 6%, Ben Carson at 5% and Rand Paul at 5%.  —  SHARES  —  TwitterFacebookLinkedin

The search has covered an area as large as the State of Indiana. Why does the search continue for two boys lost at sea for 4 days anbd counting?

To answer the question in our headline:  Because they have life-preservers,  a wooden cover from the boats engine compartment that could be used as a buoy,  and (maybe) food in an ice chest.

We are not the only ones who notice Obama's refusal to honor his black relatives.


Obama’s Kenyan Brother: Barack ‘Is Not An Honest Man’

Though President Barack Obama is currently on a trip to his father’s home country of Kenya, it’s doubtful he’ll be getting together for a family pot-luck with his older half-brother, Malik.
According to the Boston Globe’s Farah Stockman, the relationship between the Obama brothers has soured since then 25-year-old Barack, “began his search for the Kenyan family members he’d never met” back in 1986.

Malik — who has attempted a political career of his own in his home province — said in a recent interview that after failing to provide money for a family member’s funeral, it’s clear that POTUS “doesn’t want anything to do with” his Kenyan family members. “He’s not an honest man,” said the elder Obama. “It’s a big humiliation.”

She is the head of the DNC. She is Jewish, She is a parrot for the Obama Administration. So, why is she so concerned about the value of the Iranian deal Obama is trying, desperately, to sell to Congress and the nation?

I don't know whether both parties were/are "in on the fix" that is the Benghazi investigations, but this comment catches the totality of the Benghazi cover-up and the cover-up will be a campaign issue.


What are HRC and BHZero hiding? My guess has been that the U.S. - CIA and maybe the Pentagon - were running weapons thru Benghazi, to Turkey, and on to the Syrian rebels. It blew up badly when the jihadists saw an opportunity, took it, and helped themselves to some weapons while killing Americans too. The Zero-man administration wanted Qaddafi brought down in Libya and Hillary led the charge. In fact, some in the Zero WH referred to the Libyan effort as "Hillary's war". We armed the Libyan rebels to eliminate Qaddafi, even though many were jihadists. After Qaddafi was gone, the U.S. paid big bucks to buy back the weapons and ship them thru Benghazi. Obviously, we weren't able to buy them all back. This entire clandestine effort was known by leaders in both parties, and that's why, after so many investigations, nothing concrete has come out. Everyone knew about this and they'll all look as incompetent as they really are, if it all gets out - Republicans for tacit approval and the Zero administration, particularly Zero-man and Hillary, for total bungling. That's why nothing came of Hillary's "testimony" to Congress, and nothing will come of Trey Gowdy's Benghazi committee, all after close to 3 years!! The fix is in, and both political parties are participating. And the unholy alliance between Zero-man and Hillary: She is not critical of Zero-man policies while campaigning and even runs on some of them, and he doesn't spill the beans on her incompetence regarding Benghazi, or any other of many areas.

Related articles

Negligence Led To Benghazi Attack | The Daily Caller
The Daily Caller
May 19, 2015 - Two smoking guns hit the news streams this week: The U.S. indeed had a gun-running program pipelining Libyan weapons to Syrian rebels ...

BENGHAZIGATE: Obama's Secret Gun-Running Program ...
Apr 29, 2013 - Our CIA is still playing the role of vetting which Syrian rebel groups will obtain ... arms and transferring them from Libya, to Turkey, and finally into Syria. ... The story of Obama's gun-running program in Benghazi is long and ...

May 18, 2015 - The US Ambassador to Libya and three others were killed in the terrorist ... The US was in fact running guns from Benghazi to Syria when the ...

Was Syrian weapons shipment factor in ambassador's ...
Fox News Channel
Oct 25, 2012 - He said the passage of weapons from Libya to Syria would escalate ... Running Out Of Cake: Greek Crisis Reveals Consequences Of ... Obama admin looks to ban some Social Security recipients from owning guns (Fox News ...

Smoking Gun: Obama Was Operating Gun Running Scam ...
May 19, 2015 - ... that weapons were moving from the Islamic terror stronghold in Libya to Syria before the attack on the Benghazi compound on September 11, ...

US Was Smuggling Guns to Syria Through Benghazi ...
It has been alleged that this gun running operation is connected to the ... Rand Paul: It's been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that ...

CIA Gun-running, Qatar-Libya-Syria. | Global Research ...
Aug 9, 2013 - A report from CNN's Jake Tapper has reintroduced “Benghazi-Gate” to the US media spotlight. The report claims that “dozens” of CIA ...

Libya: US Generals Conclude Obama Backed Al-Qaida and ...
Jan 20, 2015 - The Obama administration's gun-running project in Libya, much like the .... of arms from Libya to Syria to arm the rebels fighting Assad, some of ...

So, The Daily Beast thinks that Hillary's marriage to Bill is some kind of example to us all and something preferable to marriage with The Donald? Good grief.

Tim Mak / The Daily Beast:
Ex-Wife: Donald Trump Made Me Feel ‘Violated’ During Sex  —  Ivana Trump once accused the real estate tycoon of ‘rape,’ although she later clarified: not in the ‘criminal sense.’  —  Donald Trump introduced his presidential campaign to the world with a slur against Mexican immigrants …

Editor's notes:  I am no Trump fan,  but to be clear,  the "slur" was against illegal/felonious immigrants.  

Palin reminds us that 80% of Planned Parenthood's abortion mills are located in minority communities, and then asks this question:

Chief Justice Ginsburg: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion.

Hillary's climate speech? She invited No One to the event. Why did she even allow pictures? And this is her upgrade to the 2008 Obama campaign?

How low has the Obama Administration gone? Al Sharpton is a primary contributor on racial issues. End of discussion.

The Blaze   Al Sharpton’s civil rights advocacy organization announced this week that it will soon be launching a new project — a blog aimed at criticizing the media.

In a statement posted to Instagram by Rachel Noerdlinger, Sharpton’s long-serving spokeswomen, National Action Network announced the new project, to be called The Shift Daily, with a message: “Journalists, writers, and bloggers: we are looking for you.”

“For decades reporters & now bloggers have been writing about [Sharpton] & [National Action Network],” Noerdlinger wrote on Instagram. “Now NAN will flip the script & write about them. They say if you don’t define your reality, others will do it for you.”[…]

Capital New York reported that NAN’s project was announced amid the news of some major rescheduling at MSNBC.

5th Circuit Federal Cout demands the Administration deport 2,000 children in this country, back to Mexico.

<<<  As you read,  understand that the 18 year old Clinton law was and is a focal point in Obama's immigration "policy."  This decision is not a blow to the Clinton's so much as it is a blow to Obama's subversive immigration plans. ~ editor.

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Department of Justice's current system of detaining children with their mothers after they've crossed the U.S.-Mexico border violates an 18-year-old court settlement.

The decision Friday by U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in California is a victory for the immigrant rights lawyers who brought the case, but its immediate implications for detainees were not yet clear. The ruling upholds a tentative decision Gee made in April, and comes a week after the two sides told her that they failed to reach a new settlement agreement as she'd asked for.

The 1997 settlement at issue bars immigrant children from being held in unlicensed, secure facilities. Gee found that settlement covered all children in the custody of federal immigration officials, even those being held with a parent.
Peter Schey, executive director of the Center for Human Rights and one of the attorneys who brought the suit, said federal officials "know they're in violation of the law."

"They are holding children in unsafe facilities. It's that simple," Schey told The Associated Press. "It's intolerable, it's in humane, and it needs to end, and end sooner rather than later."
Justice Department attorneys did not immediately reply to late-night messages seeking comment on the ruling.

The new lawsuit was brought on by new major detention centers for women and children in Texas that are overseen by the U.S. government but are managed by private prison operators. Together they have recently held more than 2,000 women and children between them after a surge of tens of thousands of immigrants from Central America, most of them mothers with children, many of whom claimed they were fleeing gang and domestic violence back home.

The Justice Department had argued it was necessary to modify the settlement and use detention to try to deter more immigrants from coming to the border after last year's surge and it was an important way to keep families together while their immigration cases were being reviewed, but the judge rejected that argument in Friday's decision.

Gee gave the Department of Justice one week to show cause why she should not enter an injunction that would require the government to comply with the ruling within 90 days.


Don't think Hillary is in trouble with the college crowd after 7 years of broken promises from the Obama/Hillary Administration? You should see pics of the lastest Youth for Democrates annual meeting.

<<<  What?  Maybe 30 or 40 people showed up for this Friday event,  including Hillary's pic for VP.  At this time,  back in mid-2007,  Obama had several thousand volunteer youth working the phones and writing emails.  Remember Obama talking about a volunteer army that would be better funded than the military?  Well,  they have all gone AWOL.  

From Campus Forum:  Emphasizing the importance of Millennial voters in upcoming elections, progressive activists spoke to a nearly empty auditorium at the College Democrats of America annual conference on Friday.

Despite offering a full day of activities, speakers like Julian Castro, and campaigning advice from top political operatives, the College Democrats of America were barely able to fill the first couple rows with young attendees.

Jihadi John is running for his life. He is of no use to ISIS and the good guys know exactly who he is and have special forces hunting him down.

European news (Mirror, UK) has filed this report: 

British terrorist Mohammed Emwazi – known as Jihadi John – has fled the IS terror network and gone on the run in Syria, according to sources.

He is said to have been terrified by the publicity when he was identified as the murderer of British and American hostages and fears being hunted down.

British and American special forces are in both Iraq and Syria.
One of their priorities is to find the 26-year-old from London and either bring him to justice or kill him.

Emwazi is also believed to fear his unmasking had diminished his value as an IS killer and also that jealous fellow jihadists might plot against him.

The best in conservative citizen journalism. The Left only has its horde of parrots.

Council Winners from 

Non-Council Winners

See you next week!

While she claims to have done she could do to help in the email scandal, she forget to mention that her server remains off-limits to the several federal probes into the scandal.

Hillary Clinton on Friday sought to downplay the latest twist in the long-running scandal over her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, saying reports of a possible criminal probe are full of inaccuracies.  

News emerged on Thursday evening that at least one inspector general passed to the Justice Department evidence of potential mishandling of classified information, a referral that could lead to a criminal investigation.

Clinton on Friday said people are getting worked up over not much. “Maybe the heat is getting to everybody,” she said, in remarks before a policy speech in New York on Wall Street.

She went on to express frustration over what she called erroneous reporting. “We all have a responsibility to get this right. I have released 55,000 pages of emails. I have said repeatedly that I will answer questions before the House committee. We are all accountable to get the facts right. I will do my part. But I’m also going to stay focused on the issues, particularly the big issues that really matter to American families.”

Mitch versus Cruz and many who do not support Cruz for president, are taking his side in this war over broken promises. We are tired of being lied to

Editor's notes:  There is something about TedCruz that is  "plastic banana."  I have no good reason for that opinion  (more a feeling than an objective thought).  At the same time,  I admit that he is a solid and sincere conservative.  His "attack" on Mitch McConnell is dead on.  Here is the heart and soul of an article from Breitbart in which Cruz's criticism of McConnell is given the attention it deserves.  

(You will want to read the full article at   Cruz  . . .   hammered GOP leadership for putting forward nothing more than a show vote—a meaningless vote—on repealing Obamacare.
“We’ll have a vote on repealing Obamacare,” Cruz said.
The Republicans will all vote “Yes.” The Democrats will all vote “no.” It will be at a 60-vote threshold. It will fail. It will be an exercise in meaningless political theater. Mind you when we actually had a fight to stop Obamacare and defund it, the Majority Leader was opposed. But an empty showboat, that is a good way to distract from what’s going on. There is a profound disappointment among the American people because we keep winning elections and then we keep getting leaders who don’t do anything they promised. The American people were told if only we have a Republican Majority, things will be different. Well, in 2010, the American people showed up in enormous numbers and we got a Republican majority in the House. And very little changed. Then the American people were told, you know, the problem is the Senate. If only we get a Republican majority in the Senate and retire Harry Reid as Majority Leader, then things will be different. Well, in 2014, the American people rose up in enormous numbers, voted to do exactly that. We’ve had a Republican majority in both Houses of Congress now for about six months. What was that majority done?
Cruz then proceeded to detail how the 2010 and 2014 elections handing the GOP majorities in the House then Senate didn’t matter one bit at all.
“First thing we did, in December, is we came back and passed a $1 trillion Cromnibus plan filled with pork and corporate welfare,” Cruz said.
That was the very first thing we did. Then this Republican majority voted to fund Obamacare, voted to fund President Obama’s unconstitutional executive amnesty. And then leadership rammed through the confirmation of Loretta Lynch as Attorney General. Madam President, which of those decisions would be one iota different if Harry Reid were still Majority Leader? Not a one. Not a one. This Senate operates exactly the same. The same priorities. And let me tell you why. It’s not that this majority doesn’t get things done. It does get things done. But it listens to one and only one voice. That is the voice of the Washington cartel, of the lobbyists on K Street, of the big money and big corporations. You know, if you go to the American people and ask is reauthorizing the Ex-Im Bank a priority for you, the standard response for most of them would be ‘the what?’ They don’t even know what this is. Let me tell you what this is. It is an egregious example of corporate welfare. It is the American taxpayers being on the dime for hundreds of billions of dollars in loan guarantees given out to a handful of giant corporations. It is a classic example of cronyism and corporate welfare. And by the way, among others you know one person who had the clarity of thought on that?
Cruz then noted how when Obama was in the Senate, he was opposed to the Ex-Im Bank—and then proceeded to further detail how the Ex-Im Bank is crony capitalism—before he turned his fire on McConnell again.
“Madam President, it saddens me to say this,” Cruz said.
I sat in my office, I told my staff the Majority Leader looked me in the eye and looked 54 Republicans in the eye. I cannot believe he would tell a flat-out lie, and I voted based on those assurances that he made to each and every one of us. What we just saw today was an absolute demonstration that not only what he told every Republican Senator, but what he told the press over and over and over again was a simple lie. This institution should not operate at the beck and call of lobbyists in Washington. This institution, the Majority and Minority Leader arm in arm again, should not team up against the American taxpayers. It’s why our children are going bankrupt. Now we’re facing an enormous threat with this Iran deal, a nuclear Iran poses the greatest national security threat tot his country.”
Cruz laid out next how McConnell wouldn’t take the steps he took to force the crony capitalist Ex-Im Bank through the Senate to protect the nation of Israel from President Obama’s deal with Iran.
And yet the Majority Leader refused to do what he just did for the Export Import Bank on Iran, refused to invoke cloture,” Cruz said. “That was an extraordinary step. Madam President, if he was telling us the truth when he said there was no deal, why would he do what he just did? Well, we now know that when the Majority Leader looks us in the eyes and makes an explicit commitment that he is willing to say things that he knows are false. That has consequences for how this body operates. If you or I cannot trust what the Majority Leader tells us, that will have consequences on other legislation as well on how this institution operates.

When the Daily Kos is reporting bad news for Hillary, you know there is something seriously wrong.

 David Nir / Daily Kos:
New York Times dramatically rewrites a new Hillary Clinton email story after midnight

More than 700 people have been executed, in Iran, by hanging from Jan through June of 2015. Many are artists, dancers and other evil "subversives." And no one in Washington gives a damn.

More than 700 people have been executed,  in Iran,  by hanging from Jan through June of 2015.  Many are artists, dancers and other evil "subversives."  And no one in Washington gives a damn. 

Understand that if we measure "giving a damn"  against what we actually accomplish,  the judgment embedded in the above headed stands as absolute truth. 

We  --  The People  --  need to stop equating "talk" with "accomplishment."  More than this,  we all need to use accomplishments,  those results that are without question or debate,  as that which defines "caring and diplomatic concern."  Until and unless that happens,  we  --  The People --  will continue to support those who accomplish nothing that aligns with our desires.

90% of what has been accomplished by the current Rogue Administration does not meet with the approval of The People.  So,  when will The People respond and vote for real change and accomplishment that goes far far beyond "hope?"