The Left loves to quote the military and "accepted science" as proof of global warming. Problem, it is against accepted internal "law" to wander from government prescribed rhetorical norms. The government has criminalized opposition speech on this subject. As a result, nothing said supporting the issue of warming can be viewed as dependable because nothing said comes from free and open discourse. The following is a perfect example this anti-free speech policy:
BY:
A new congressional investigation has determined that the
Obama administration fired a top scientist and intimidated staff at the
Department of Energy in order to further its climate change agenda,
according to a new report that alleges the administration ordered top
officials to obstruct Congress in order to forward this agenda.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R., Texas), chair of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, released a wide-ranging report
on Tuesday that shows how senior Obama administration officials
retaliated against a leading scientist and plotted ways to block a
congressional inquiry surrounding key research into the impact of
radiation.
A top DoE scientist who liaised with Congress on the matter
was fired by the Obama administration for being too forthright with
lawmakers, according to the report, which provides an in-depth look at
the White House’s efforts to ensure senior staffers toe the
administration’s line.
The report also provides evidence that the Obama
administration worked to kill legislation in order to ensure that it
could receive full funding for its own hotly contested climate change
agenda.
The report additionally discovered efforts by the Obama
administration to censor the information given to Congress, interfering
with the body’s ability to perform critical oversight work.
“Instead of providing the type of scientific information
needed by Congress to legislate effectively, senior departmental
officials sought to hide information, lobbied against legislation, and
retaliated against a scientist for being forthcoming,” Smith said in a
statement. “In this staff report based on lengthy record before the
committee, much has been revealed about how senior level agency
officials under the Obama administration retaliated against a scientist
who did not follow the party line.”
Read the full article here.
Noelle Metting is a radiation biologist, has nothing to do with climate research.
ReplyDeleteQuite a stretch there, sparky.
Since alarmist warming has never been proven on a global scale (all warming is a regional issue), all Metting needs to know is the science regarding low dose radiation , and he is qualified for that. But does any of this have to do with obeying the rules? Nothing. Metting was fired because Obama demands control of all facets of warming "science." Try to keep up, Slick.
DeleteWTF are you talking about?
DeleteThe Left has criminalize "warming speech" to reflect ONLY the pro-global warming agenda. Try reading the above post. You only win the debate when you ban opposition speech. Now you know, Comrade.
DeleteThe latest information... not that you will read it or understand it. This blog clearly does not respect or report real science. (Often just the latest fake news "scientist" from the Daily Caller).
ReplyDeleteThe cruise ship Crystal Serenity is now ferrying passengers through the NW passage... first time in commercial cruise ship history regular passages through the Arctic. In mid-November, parts of the Arctic were more than 35 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than observed averages.
https://wwa.climatecentral.org/analyses/north-pole-nov-dec-2016/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/21/science/arctic-global-warming.html
So what? It is a fantasy to believe that man can do anything about this Arctic phenomena. Will it happen next year and the next and the next? No. Could global science predict this event? Nope. And who says this is a bad thing?
ReplyDeleteA bad thing for you is when your Mom puts too much starch in short shorts wash.
" It is a fantasy to believe that man can do anything about this Arctic phenomena."
ReplyDeleteI agree, at least in the short term.
"Will it happen next year and the next and the next? No."
The trend is clear. We'll see.
"And who says this is a bad thing?
Not a bad thing if you don't care about species extinction and billions losing homes to rising oceans.
The last time you all predicted rising tides, was in 2005, predicting 20 foot of ocean water standing at the 9/11 memorial site . . . . thats 20 foot of water by 2015.
Delete"you all" ... try to be a little more sophisticated in your thinking. Doesn't bode well when discussing scientific matters.
DeleteBut then again, look who you voted for.
Stay with that uppity/arrogant bullshit and you will lose the next election or three. Want to bet that Trump knows more about business and corporate management than you and anyone in your Marxist band of adolescents?
DeleteBesides, if Trump is such a dunce, how the hell did he manage 2 billion in free media during the campaign, winning an election against ALL odds, and beating Obama one on one in Michigan.
You Eiffel Tower wussies, know nothing about the real world. Its all theory and mathematical projections. Can't fight and win a war. Can't balance a budget . . . hell, you all can't write a damn budget.
And if Trump is able to do something significant in the Inner Cities, you all won't win another major election.