B Obama is our first American president to enlist those with Communist sympathies.

76 share

McCarthy-ism*:  In the past,  I have written of my opinion that Sen. Joe McCarthy,  back in the 1950’s,  was right.  Indeed, back then,  the communist movement within our nation,  was alive and well.  Of course,  McCarthy was an admitted drunk.  Of course,  he went about his investigation,  poorly and ill-advised.  But,  and I must write “Of course,”  Joe McCarthy was absolutely right,  as to the growing influence of Communism in high places and political office(s).  Finally,  after all these years (since 1952),  under Obama,  known Communist sympathizers and members,  are a part of his Administration.  To name two well known members,  we have Anita Dunn,  Obama’s first

and long time press manager,  who openly praised the Chinese Communistist dictator,  Mao Tes-yung (which rhymes with “Tes – dung”),  and Van Jones,  Obama’s first “Green Czar” and a card carrying Communist for 10 years by his own admission. You should know,  also,  that Valarie Jarrett's father was a Communist.

And today,  we have this news clip,  confirming Communism's growing influence within the Democrat Party's Left Wing radicals (you know them as "Progressives"):     (May 21, 2014) Democratic Florida Rep. Joe Garcia — fresh off being caught eating his own earwax on camera — was caught red-handed (or is it yellow-fingered?) in another gaffe this week, claiming that low crime rates in border cities with lots of federal immigration workers is proof that “Communism works.”

This statement is being depicted as a "gaffe,"  but,  of course,  you and I know no one who would make such a "gaffe,"  and,  the fact that this is a first  in Florida State politics makes this ill-advised rhetoric less a gaffe and more a declaration of party politics and personal allegiance.  The event would be fairly innocuous if not for current Democrat Party politics and the backdrop it provides in terms of context,  for such a statement.  Besides those named in the above,  we can add nearly all the names of the Congressional Black Caucus,  who have gone on record,  praising the likes of the dead,  Hugo Chavez,  and the never-dead,  Fidel Castro.  

Ask yourselves this question:   What is the impact of Obama's alliances with "Marxist professors,"  his press secretary's praise and search for direction from Moa,  his Green Czar's 10 year membership with the Communist party,  a membership "rejected" when he decided to move into national politics,  and the adoration of the 40 member Congressional Black Caucus?  

Answer:  Whatever the case,  the fact of the matter is this  --  Communism is an attack on personal freedoms,  property rights,  free speech and private gun ownership (and more) and it is alive and well,  within our very presidency.   

_________________________________

Footnotes: 

*  Mc·Car·thy·ism

məˈkärTHēˌizəm/

noun

1.                              a vociferous campaign against alleged communists in the US government and other institutions carried out under Senator Joseph McCarthy in the period 1950–54. Many of the accused were blacklisted or lost their jobs, although most did not in fact belong to the Communist Party.  

Dunn talking 

about those to whom she turns to "most,"  

s

We are all Marxists now - Part II: The following describes Marxism's view on "job lock," Capitalism and the benefits of a communal society. This is where Obama/Pelosi/Durbin/Reid all got their idea for "job lock."

<<<   We're all Marxists, now.  

From the creator of socialism and communalism, we have this - Marxists.org:

For as soon as the distribution of labour comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity, [in other words:  job lock] which is forced upon him and from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critical critic, and must remain so if he does not want to lose his means of livelihood; while in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after . . . . . .  

Anyone still believe there to be a political equivalency between Occupy and the teaparty, grassroots movement?

Van Jones,  Obama's first "green czar" (2009),  was an admitted communist for ten years (see Politifact, here) and hoped to use Occupy,  as near a "communist front,"  in this country,  as one get,  as a base for a grand political third party,  complete with representatives in each of the 50 states,  a national convention and a national presidential candidate (2012).  Of course,  none of this happened,  and Occupy never grew out of the anarchist/adolescent stage of its so-called "development."  But, the fact that Jones was more than amenable to the goals and antics of Occupy,  is all the proof this editor needs,  to continue thinking of Jones as an undeclared communist,  in his present life.  

Occupy celebrates its 2nd anniversary,  this week.  At no time has Occupy had more than 5,000 dedicated members,  nation wide,   who did more than show up and vandalize businesses.  Van Jones' decision that "now" was the time for a national restructuring of the State via a political party that would grow out of Occupy,  demonstrates the idealistic immaturity of this man who joined Obama in working for fundamental change to this great nation.  The difference between Jones and Obama,  noteworthy, however.  While their announced goals are the same,  Van Jones is consistent and, even,  honest in his socialist pursuits.  Obama is not,  and has become a major disappointment to those who thought radical change was coming to America.  

In May of 2008,  in a speech in Puerto Rico,  Michelle Obama announced the radicalism of her husband when she spoke these words:   "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation." 

You cannot sound more radical than this without calling for a violent uprising. 

Today,  while Occupy "celebrates" its meager existence per the demonstration pictured in this post,  teaparty types have rolled into DC,  more than 1 million strong (hoping for 2 million) and established the reality that conservatives and the teaparty alliance are as strong as ever.  

It should be noted that while Obama has grown this country's ruling class,  he has failed miserably to fulfill the words of his radicalized wife.  Understand that this is not simply "Obama's failure."  Rather,  we are watching the failings of a world ideology that is failed in every nation in which it was tried. 

Whether or not you agree with that statement,  certainly,  it is clear that a state sponsored socialism that feeds off the suppression of US Constitutional rights,  does not work in this country.  There is something to be said for the fact that capitalism expressed and grounded in individual rights  is more than a core principle in the creation and function of this country;  it is systemic to its very nature as a nation,  and cannot be change with a dictatorial overthrow of the system,  as a whole.  And,  that will not happen before the next civil war.