Showing posts with label van Jones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label van Jones. Show all posts

Its "pay back time" in this Administration. Will the nation survive the assault of the anti-Constitution Left ? I am not sure any of us know.

"We'll tear this gawd-damn country up," (video)  and with those words,  we have the attitude of the "outsiders" who have become a pox on our nation and our presidency.  Words for calm from Obama, to be sure, but words countered (by Obama) with comments addressed to the Ferguson rioters such as "Stay the course."  He is surrounded by his Castro loving Congressional Black Caucus, and,  has never leveled a single word of condemnation for the trash that is the Angry Black Leadership, per se,   in this country.  No challenge to Louis Farrakhan Muhammad (that's the man's full name),  specifically, and the content and goals of Farrakhan's Nation of Islam.  Not a word critical of Jeremiah Wright,  the person,  and Wright's anti-colonial (as in all that came out of the 13 Colonies), anti-"white man's Christianity" mentality.  There is Obama's administrative inclusion of an Attorney General, Eric Holder,  who has radicalized the Department of Justice,  filled its ranks with some 40 lawyers who refuse to prosecute black on white crime and sees himself an activist black man.   We have a president who reaches out for counsel from Al Sharpton;  invites him to the WH and refuses to challenge this man,  one of the most divisive leaders to have ever come onto the American scene.  Understand this:  these leaders and more  (the 10 year, card carrying communist, Van Jones, the New Black Panthers whom he refuses to prosecute, Bill Ayers) all preach "violent revolution if necessary" and treat white people, those who disagree with their avocation for violence,  as slave masters or "Uncle Toms."  


You should know that Mike Brown's stepdad has been filmed calling for the destruction of Ferguson  ("Burn this bitch down,  burn this bitch down, burn this bitch down") . He and Brown's mother visited the UN,  filed a complaint against Ferguson and the United States,  and returned home, but not before taking pictures with their right hands raised in a Black Power salute.

Understand this:  there is nothing "American" about "Black Power," the Black Power salute, Jeremiah Wright's anti-white rants,  Holder's refusal to prosecute Black on white crime,  Sharpton's "war against whitie" and, his favorite rant,  "No Justice, no peace,"  or the Congressional Black Caucus's embrace of Fidel Castro.  

Obama has emboldened all of this and more.  What to do?  Prepare to protect yourself,  never fail to vote against this crap,  and, wait for this episode in our history,  to be over.     

B Obama is our first American president to enlist those with Communist sympathies.


76 share
McCarthy-ism*:  In the past,  I have written of my opinion that Sen. Joe McCarthy,  back in the 1950’s,  was right.  Indeed, back then,  the communist movement within our nation,  was alive and well.  Of course,  McCarthy was an admitted drunk.  Of course,  he went about his investigation,  poorly and ill-advised.  But,  and I must write “Of course,”  Joe McCarthy was absolutely right,  as to the growing influence of Communism in high places and political office(s).  Finally,  after all these years (since 1952),  under Obama,  known Communist sympathizers and members,  are a part of his Administration.  To name two well known members,  we have Anita Dunn,  Obama’s first
and long time press manager,  who openly praised the Chinese Communistist dictator,  Mao Tes-yung (which rhymes with “Tes – dung”),  and Van Jones,  Obama’s first “Green Czar” and a card carrying Communist for 10 years by his own admission. You should know,  also,  that Valarie Jarrett's father was a Communist.

And today,  we have this news clip,  confirming Communism's growing influence within the Democrat Party's Left Wing radicals (you know them as "Progressives"):     (May 21, 2014) Democratic Florida Rep. Joe Garcia — fresh off being caught eating his own earwax on camera — was caught red-handed (or is it yellow-fingered?) in another gaffe this week, claiming that low crime rates in border cities with lots of federal immigration workers is proof that “Communism works.”

This statement is being depicted as a "gaffe,"  but,  of course,  you and I know no one who would make such a "gaffe,"  and,  the fact that this is a first  in Florida State politics makes this ill-advised rhetoric less a gaffe and more a declaration of party politics and personal allegiance.  The event would be fairly innocuous if not for current Democrat Party politics and the backdrop it provides in terms of context,  for such a statement.  Besides those named in the above,  we can add nearly all the names of the Congressional Black Caucus,  who have gone on record,  praising the likes of the dead,  Hugo Chavez,  and the never-dead,  Fidel Castro.  

Ask yourselves this question:   What is the impact of Obama's alliances with "Marxist professors,"  his press secretary's praise and search for direction from Moa,  his Green Czar's 10 year membership with the Communist party,  a membership "rejected" when he decided to move into national politics,  and the adoration of the 40 member Congressional Black Caucus?  

Answer:  Whatever the case,  the fact of the matter is this  --  Communism is an attack on personal freedoms,  property rights,  free speech and private gun ownership (and more) and it is alive and well,  within our very presidency.   
_________________________________
Footnotes: 

*  Mc·Car·thy·ism
məˈkärTHēˌizəm/
noun
1.                              a vociferous campaign against alleged communists in the US government and other institutions carried out under Senator Joseph McCarthy in the period 1950–54. Many of the accused were blacklisted or lost their jobs, although most did not in fact belong to the Communist Party.  

Dunn talking 
about those to whom she turns to "most,"  
s




Anyone still believe there to be a political equivalency between Occupy and the teaparty, grassroots movement?

Van Jones,  Obama's first "green czar" (2009),  was an admitted communist for ten years (see Politifact, here) and hoped to use Occupy,  as near a "communist front,"  in this country,  as one get,  as a base for a grand political third party,  complete with representatives in each of the 50 states,  a national convention and a national presidential candidate (2012).  Of course,  none of this happened,  and Occupy never grew out of the anarchist/adolescent stage of its so-called "development."  But, the fact that Jones was more than amenable to the goals and antics of Occupy,  is all the proof this editor needs,  to continue thinking of Jones as an undeclared communist,  in his present life.  

Occupy celebrates its 2nd anniversary,  this week.  At no time has Occupy had more than 5,000 dedicated members,  nation wide,   who did more than show up and vandalize businesses.  Van Jones' decision that "now" was the time for a national restructuring of the State via a political party that would grow out of Occupy,  demonstrates the idealistic immaturity of this man who joined Obama in working for fundamental change to this great nation.  The difference between Jones and Obama,  noteworthy, however.  While their announced goals are the same,  Van Jones is consistent and, even,  honest in his socialist pursuits.  Obama is not,  and has become a major disappointment to those who thought radical change was coming to America.  
In May of 2008,  in a speech in Puerto Rico,  Michelle Obama announced the radicalism of her husband when she spoke these words:   "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation." 

You cannot sound more radical than this without calling for a violent uprising. 

Today,  while Occupy "celebrates" its meager existence per the demonstration pictured in this post,  teaparty types have rolled into DC,  more than 1 million strong (hoping for 2 million) and established the reality that conservatives and the teaparty alliance are as strong as ever.  

It should be noted that while Obama has grown this country's ruling class,  he has failed miserably to fulfill the words of his radicalized wife.  Understand that this is not simply "Obama's failure."  Rather,  we are watching the failings of a world ideology that is failed in every nation in which it was tried. 

Whether or not you agree with that statement,  certainly,  it is clear that a state sponsored socialism that feeds off the suppression of US Constitutional rights,  does not work in this country.  There is something to be said for the fact that capitalism expressed and grounded in individual rights  is more than a core principle in the creation and function of this country;  it is systemic to its very nature as a nation,  and cannot be change with a dictatorial overthrow of the system,  as a whole.  And,  that will not happen before the next civil war.    

Van Jones Part I: Van Jones is Barack Obama in disguise. And you should see his plans for this election year.


Is it suddenly disreputable to advocate free-market policies? That's the question raised by a remarkable political assault on the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which promotes reform in the 50 states. Led by former White House aide Van Jones, various left-wing activists and media are bullying big business to cut off ALEC's funding. So much for free and open debate.
Founded in 1973, ALEC is a group of state lawmakers who meet to share and spread conservative policy ideas. ALEC's main focus is fiscal and economic policy, notably at the moment pension and lawsuit reform, tax and spending limitation . . . . . . (WSJ)
Editor's notes:  indeed, this attack against ALEC is an incredible display of Leftist hypocrisy at the highest level.  Van Jones carried a communist card in his back pocket for 10 freaking years,  according to  . . . . . . . . . van Jones.  He was hired into the Obama Administration as the Green Czar and was forced out because of attention bought to his person by the patriot, Glenn Beck.  Jones may have been the first card carrying commie ("ex" or otherwise) to work for a president in the history of this country.  
I think we go too far in making him to be "public enemy number one,"  but he certainly is a formidable trouble maker.  Most of his efforts have ended in failure, but he has had success in scaring businesses away from ALEC.  His efforts have driven McDonalds and  WalMart (for examples) to curtail their financial support of ALEC.  And Jones' only complaint, is that ALEC is a right leaning organization and, in terms of today's news,  supports fairness in the Trayvon Martin killing (ALEC wanting justice,  the angry black cabal wanting revenge).  
The hypocrisy of this pleasant sounding but very angry black man is astonishing.   What makes him dangerous to a free society is his attractiveness as a person:  good looking,  pleasant in personality and well spoken.  To bad he is a stinking commie, right? 
Like I said,  his assault against ALEC is his only real success story.  Jones wants ALEC gone in a final sense but supports MoveOn.org and Media Matters for doing the same sort of thing (as ALEC), only in spades.  
Jones appears to lead a rather simple life,  but he is
a man of more means than might appear in this
family photo with wife and kids.  We see Jones as
a true "we are the world" socialist, as opposed to
Obama's political brand of One Worldism. Who is
more the threat, the hones socialist or the one
convoluted one with power? 
Van Jones failed to positioning himself in the Administration and was driven out.  He has failed to gather support around Cap and Trade or to raise public awareness in that regard,  He is given to exaggeration, recently claiming "100,000 green jobs" when,  in fact,  there are less than 17,0000.   He tried to co-opt "Occupy"  but failed in that effort mostly because Occupy devolved into an anarchist terror movement that defied all political structure.  At one point in time,  van Jones had planned to create a third party,  a straight up social concern complete   with delegates from all 50 states and a national convention to be held this coming June.  Ain't going to happen. 
Like I said,  van Jones is not yet,  the success he wants to be,  but,  neither is he going away anytime soon.  If he compares himself to where he was several years ago,  he would argue for his success.  
And he has a new "offensive" in mind.  He calls it "The 99% Spring." 
 “The choice is in our hands. This spring, we will act on that choice and rise up in the tradition of our forefathers and foremothers. We will not be complicit with the suffering in our families for another year. We will prepare ourselves for sustained non-violent direct action.”

That “preparation” looks like a week-long training session from April 9-15. But not just any training session, this training session will be held across the country and will reportedly feature meetings in “places of worship”
You will not  hear more on this effort form others, than what you read, here,  at Midknight Review unless, of course,  you subscribe to Glenn Beck.  I say this with confidence because April 9 - 15 was nearly two weeks ago and absolutely nothing was reported in the liberal media and  little to nothing in the Right (as in "correct") Media. Understand, Jones did begin his training program and thousands have been part of the program, or so we are told.  


This blog will continue to look to van Jones and what he is trying to accomplish.  If you want to follow this fellow, yourself,  the van Jones site is here.  
Understand that this blog believes that van Jones speaks for Barack Obama in precise measure and we will represent this comparison as "true"  unless and until Barack Obama denies van Jones and his socialist efforts and does so  in a demonstrable way.  
In a sense,  if van Jones carries  a communist card,  so does Obama; if van Jones happily admits to being a socialist,  so does Obama;  if van Jones is working for the end of America as we know it to be, so, too, is Barack Obama.  Untrue??  Fine.  Again, prove me wrong with something other than words.