Rand Paul names the whistleblower without identifying him as such - and gets away with it.

Rand Paul mentions the "Vindman brothers who know Eric  G . . .  (go to 139 on

the video feed)."
 Eric G  is the whistleblower.  The Chief Justice must know that the 

whistle blower has already been name which means   . . . .  the Chief Justice is as much a game player as the rest of the jerks in congress. 

Gohmert reveals whistleblower; NBC pretends to morally object and all this about a man whose name hase been "out there" for months

NBC News: GOP Rep. Gohmert publicly names person some Republicans say is whistleblower

This blog posted the name of the Whistleblower Oct. 31 of 2019. Click on the "whistleblower " label below.

Trump's Impeachment Strategy

Question: Obviously Schiff and the Impeachment Democrats do not want anyone to talk to the so-called whistleblower.  It is obvious that the Blower is not protected from being required to give testimony,  I mean,  he had to fill out  and sign a complaint form   . . .  why not give testimony.  No one wants to do this man harm.  Besides,  we all know who this man is  (click on the lable below, "whistleblower").

Adam Schiff is a fact witness because he not only knows the whistleblower but has had talks (counsel) with the man.  Trump has every right to depose Schiff AND the whistleblower AND cross examine the two men.

Finally,  Trump has every right to cross examinie those who witnessed against him during the impeachment hearing as well as depose his own witnesses.

The Dems want none of this.

Personally,  I believe there is high probability that an impeachment recommendation will not be sent to the Senate.  precisely because of Trump's strategy and the fact that the Dems have not proven their case for impeachment and removal.  

Just in case you missed it, here is the name of the whistleblower:

Eric Ciaramella

The name has been in the public record for at least three weeks.  He is a partisan Democrat  and has been involved with the "coup" attempt (their word) at some level for more than a year before becoming the "whistleblower."  In fact,  it is a known fact that he met with Adam Schiff before the release of the whistleblower complaint,  that his complaint was written with the help of several agents/politicians/lawyers and was not of his own creation.  

Schiff will continue to refuse to allow his public or private testimony because of the above facts, pretending,  instead,  that members of the GOP or their operatives intend to harm or kill the Blower.   Pure nonsense but that is the lie that is being told by Schiff and his associates. 

Now you know. 

Update:   Like we didn't already know his name;

YouTube Blocks Judicial Watch Video on Alleged Whistleblower E*** CIA*******

Whistleblower willing to answer questions? Not really.

Margaret Brennan / CBS News: Whistleblower willing to answer Republicans' questions in impeachment probe, lawyer says  —

Editor:  What the headline does not even hint at is the fact that the whistleblower  (we already know who he is) is willing to answer questions but only in writing.  "Only in writing" makes followup questions virtually impossible.  "Only in writing" eliminates the possibility of inadvertent admissions/confessions.  "Only in writing" provides cover for expressions of uncomfort or anger with the questioning.  

In America,  "only in writing" is simply not the American way.  No lawyer for the accused,  whether in a criminal trial cross examination or a preordained impeachment hearing,  would ever agree to "only in writing."   

The whistleblower is a Democrat insider working with a cadre of political and Intel advisers to create his "complaint."  He is not  and should not be immune from agressive questioning.

As has been the case with virtually all other issues used against the President,  the longer this battle over the whistlebllower lasts,  the greater the possibility of its total demise.  And,  because of this "pattern of demise,"  this immediate effort to frame the President as "unfit for office" will (also) fail.  

This Review is one of the first to reveal the name and picture of the socalled "whistleblower."

Paul Sperry / RealClearInvestigations: ‘Whistleblower’ Exposed: Close to Biden, Brennan, Schiff's Staff, and DNC Operative  —  For a town that leaks like a sieve, Washington has done an astonishingly effective job keeping from the American public the name of the anonymous “whistleblower" who triggered impeachment proceedings against President Trump — even though his identity is an open secret inside the Beltway.

More than two months after the official filed his complaint, pretty much all that’s known publicly about him is that he is a CIA analyst who at one point was detailed to the White House and is now back working at the CIA.

But the name of a government official fitting that description — Eric Ciaramella — has been raised privately in impeachment depositions, according to officials with direct knowledge of the proceedings, as well as in at least one open hearing held by a House committee not involved in the impeachment inquiry. Fearing their anonymous  witness could be exposed, Democrats this week blocked Republicans from asking more questions about him and intend to redact his name from all deposition transcripts.

Read the rest of the story here.

After you read the following headline, say this out loud: "But we already know why."

Intel Community Inspector General Stonewalls Congress – Refuses to Explain Why He Backdated Secret Changes to Whistleblower Form

Of course, we know why.  It was to allow for the latest Democrat investigative scam.  Prior to this most recent whistleblower complaint,  second and third-hand information was not allowed.  

Here is a critical conversation regarding withholding military aid to Ukraine that will be completely ignored by Trump's Opposition.

Here is part of a text converation between Bill Taylor,  a top diplomate in the Ukraine and the Ambassador to the E.U., Gordon Sondland

Taylor:  As I said on the phone,  I think its crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

Sondland replies:  Bill,  I believe you are incorrect aboutPresident Trump's intentions.  The President has been crystal clear:  no quid pro quo's of any kind.  The President is trying to evaluate whether Unkraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during the campaign.  I suggest we stop the back andforth by text.

Sept 9, 2019.

This conversation establishes Trump's true intentions well before the release of the whistleblower complaint . . . .   about three weeks before said complaint. This timeline is critical because it references Trump's intent well before any knowledge of a complaint.  In other words,  this conversation is not a defense/explanation against a complaint,  but rather a clarification as to what the President did when he decided to withhold military aid for a period of time in order to confirm a policy move in the Ukraine against government corruption.  And "yes,"  the aid was withheld in the month prior to the complaint's release.  Timelines are important, and the Opposition is ignoring the timeline.

The readership should also note that this military aid was eventually given to Ukraine but WITHOUT any hint of an Ukraine investigation into Biden   . . . .   a timeline of events that destroys the fantasy of a quid pro quo.  

"They wrote a legal brief, called it a whistleblower complaint, and changed the rules 3 weeks before going public . . . . and you still believe this is an honest presentation ???

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 2:02 PM PT – Monday, September 30, 2019

Whistleblower form changed to allow 2nd and 3rd hand inform with CIA knowledge:

According to new reports, the original whistleblower form had been doctored to allow for second-hand accounts less than a month before the leaker accused President Trump of wrongdoing.
One America’s Chanel Rion has the story from the White House.

Under the new rules (August f 2019), information in a whistleblower complaint does not have to be 1st information. In other words, "they" can simply make up garbageand report that as if fact, kind of like what they are doing right now.

Brennan Calls on Unlimited Number of Deep State Spies to Use New, Secretly Altered Whistleblower Complaint Form to ‘Report Trump’

Editor:  Until August of 2019, all whistleblower complaints had to be borne of 1st hand information.  That was changed by whoever has the authority to change things in August and WALA,  we have the current whistleblower report  . . . .   and all of it is 2nd and 3rd hand information, meaning . . . . . . . . . .  none of it would be allowed in a court of law.   

Such is the nature of virtually all the major headlined charges against our President.

Understand that the rules were changed a month and a half ago and the complaint,  written by a staff of lawyers,  was submitted almost immediately.  

I believe this latest faux scandal will take us right up to election day, and,  I believe this because they have run out of time to come up with anything real and criminal.  They have no choice but to die with this latest nonsense.  That is why Pelosi has made it clear that no other complaint will be used in the coming impeachment complaint by the House.   Her reasoning?  Because to use the other complaints would weaken the case for impeachment, proving that "they" know they have failed in their previous efforts to criminally condemn our President.

Whistleblower complaints must be (according to stated law) first hand information, not 2nd or 3rd hand information as is the case with the current complaint. But, if you are a Democrat, what do you care about stated law?

www.whistleblower.gov/overview/submitatip

The information must be original information not previously known to the Commission, but if the whistleblower is the original source of the information, it would be deemed original information 

The following text come from :  https://www.whistleblower.gov/overview/submitatip/

The Whistleblower Rules specify the prerequisites and eligibility requirements. Prerequisites include:

• Whistleblower information must be provided voluntarily, prior to a request, inquiry, or demand for information
• The information must be original information not previously known to the Commission, but if the whistleblower is the original source of the information, it would be deemed original information
• The information must have led to a successful resolution of CFTC action or a Related Action
• The whistleblower, upon CFTC staff’s request, must provide certain additional information
• The whistleblower must have submitted an award application (Form WB-APP) in response to a Notice of Covered Action or a final judgment in a Related Action or both

Related update

  The Federalist:

Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge  —  Federal records show that the intelligence community secretly revised the formal whistleblower complaint form in August 2019 to eliminate the requirement of direct, first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing.

 

Apparently the whistleblower plot was weldefined by August of  2019.  The whistle blower doument is entirely 2nd and 3rd hand information,  not allowed before August of this year   . . . .  a move that allows the whistleblower lie to continue as it based on facts.  

Is the whistleblower report falling apart? First we find out that the whistleblower is a Brennan CIA agent, and now this:

Understand that the whistleblower's "first hand source" was not in the room.  If true,   this "report" is uncorroborated hearsay,  and,  would never be allowed as evidence in an actual room trial. 

Mark Meadows told Lou Dobbs the whistleblower’s complaint is already starting to fall apart.

Rep. Mark Meadows:  Here’s what we do know.  There’s reports out just minutes ago that on page three where the whistleblower said that he heard a counselor for the State Department was actually on the call, well the State Department says, no that didn’t happen. Well, we’re going to find out a whole more of what didn’t happen.

The partisan CIA whistleblower said in his report that State Department official Ulrich Brechbuhl was on the call with the Ukrainian president.

He wasn’t according to State Department officials.