"I double dare you," is Obama's recent attack on the GOP.

Obama dares GOP to make healthcare plans public

 Does this loser of a president actually think the new and revised healthcare plan is not going to be put before the people?  Look,  let's wait for a year,  at least, before offering up any criticism.. . . .   same time it took the Dems to write this pathetic law,   

4 comments:

  1. Repealing Obamacare with no identified replacement will result in more American deaths every 6 months than were killed in 9/11.

    FACT

    But who cares? Repeal

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a load of crap. First, there are no credible stats that give us this stat . . . . none. Secondly, The reason for an 18 to 36 month delay is this: The GOP will repeal ObamaCare quickly, but the repeal will not go into effect before the plan is approved.

      But to your imagined point: Without ObamaCare, we will the same environment as was the case in 2009, before ObamaCare. People weren;'t dropping like flies then. The ER's across the nation would become the primary care facility, just like before ObamaCare. It is more misinformation from the Leftist control freaks that a time without ObamaCare is a time without health care. Simply not true and hasn't been true for a couple of decades.

      Delete
  2. And the hits just keep on coming. How's this for intellectual integrity?

    Conservative author and television personality Monica Crowley, whom Donald Trump has tapped for a top national security communications role, plagiarized large sections of her 2012 book, a CNN review has found. 50 examples of plagiarism from numerous sources. 50. The book contains no notes or bibliography.

    http://money.cnn.com/interactive/news/kfile-trump-monica-crowley-plagiarized-multiple-sources-2012-book/

    That's the level of ethics we're dealing with.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The so-called plagiarized information, from what I have seen, is nothing short of Crowley copying statements of fact. Under copyright law, an author is entitled to a statement of fact, not a statement that is clearly "commentary." Case closed except for the disruptors on the Left.

      Delete