The following headline should not cause concern for the patriot nation and here is why:
George Soros Surrogate Teams Up With California Law Firm To Encourage Electors To Go Rogue
That is the headline and part of the Sunday morning news. Worrisome ? Not really and here is why.
For openers, the strategy will fail. Trump has 306 electoral votes but only needs 270. There are no current projections that take Trumnps victory away from him.
But, if successful, the selection of the next president would take place in the House of Representatives . . . . and the GOP owns the House. Trump was remain the president- elect, period.
We will know, soon enough. The Electoral College votes on December the 19th.
You should know that the Dems are driving the recount challenge. The Never Trump crowd . . . . all six of them . . . . . are partners with the Left in the effort to flip the Electoral College vote. When this is over, the Never Trump crowd should be driven out of the GOP and summarily ignored . . . . including John Kasich and Jeb Bush. These men made a pledge to support the GOP candidate, a move on their part to put Trump in a box. Turns out, their efforts were nothing more than a ploy. Their "word" is crap and their claim to future leadership is done.
Another election is in order. Our previous election was tainted, manipulated by Russian propaganda and vote hacking.
ReplyDelete"the Never Trump crowd should be driven out of the GOP and summarily ignored . . . . including John Kasich and Jeb Bush."
Who wrote this? Can you say "unprincipled hypocrite"?
"The Confederate Right Wing of the GOP, aka Trump supporters"
"If Trump thinks Putin is anything but a thugish killer, I will not vote for him."
"Trump is no Conservative. Proof? This Sunday's morning shows"
" Reasons for rejecting Donald Trump as a pretend conservative: I can't imagine that he will make it through the GOP primaries and I know absolutely no one who likes the man . . . . . too full of himself and his mouth, it reminds me of a fish out of water, trying to get oxygen. "
"His four bankruptcies indicate, in part, poor personal judgement (Politifact, here) . I believe they also indicated a personal disregard for the trust of those who trusted in your promise to pay."
" Lets talk about who is the real moron, here. You support a man who is already backing off his pledge to deport the masses. Read his immigration paper and see if you can find a hint of his pledge to deport 11 million illegals. He ain't going to do it. Gun control: he will nominate someone like his sister to the High Court. He has already made that clear . . . . and she is a gun ownership hater. Apparently he is in love with the KKK and David Duke. He thinks the confederate flag (note the small "c") is a righteous symbol of some kind. He and Putin are going to get along "just fine." Wow, we should all be happy for Putin. He can't spell, but that probably doesn't bother you. He uses bankruptcies to balance his expenses, making him a first class cheat. But maybe you don't know how bankruptcy works for a con man. What the con artist does is promise and promise and promise to pay for goods and services received, knowing all along that he has no intentions of paying for those goods and services. One bankruptcy? You got yourself in a bind. Four bankruptcies costing 20,000 jobs and millions and millions of dollars to folks/investors/subcontractors/vendors who believed his crap lies . . . . . he did it on purpose with the intent of defrauding. Defense of that crap is what I call moronic."
You will never be successful in debate if you cannot correctly frame the issues and reflect, accurately, the positions of your opponent. More to the point, you will never win a debate by quoting an opponent who has obviously changed his mind on a given subject.
DeleteYou are quoting me, of course. How do I respond? Simple. By saying, I changed my mind. Anyone who reads this blog, knows the change was slow (over the course of a year and a half) and rather comprehensive. Kind of a waste of time.