41 share
our goal is 40
very strong interest
World map with nuclear weapons development status represented by color.
Five "nuclear weapons states" from the NPT
Other states known to possess nuclear weapons
States formerly possessing nuclear weapons
States suspected of being in the process of developing nuclear weapons and/or nuclear programs
States which at one point had nuclear weapons and/or nuclear weapons research programs
States that possess nuclear weapons, but have not widely adopted them
(Source: Wikipedia)
A Chinese
provincial government website has disclosed the first official images of China’s newest and largest intercontinental
missile—the multi-warhead DF-41, which is capable of striking the United States.
Official
confirmation of the new multi-warhead missile was touted by state-run Chinese
press a day before the Aug. 1 anniversary of the founding of the People’s
Liberation Army, China’s
communist-controlled military that is undergoing a major crackdown on
corruption that has ensnared one of the most senior uniformed officers, former
Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Gen. Xu Caihou. (Source: Washington Free Beacon)
Status Report:
Iran is well on its way to a nuclear bomb. Obama has failed to curtail this effort despite claims to the contrary. It's primary problem at the moment, seems to be a very aggressive "virus" attack on its computer system that manages nuclear development, from secretive outside sources (the US and Israel - ?).
N Korea: The country has nuclear capability but its "scientists" appear to be too stupid to figure out a "delivery" system that actually works.
Russia continues to maintain its arsenal but is almost broke, as a national economy. In spite of its economic woes, Russia is quite advanced as to its nuclear systems, and has long had the ability to attack the United States.
China's economy appears to be robust and has tripled the size of its military over the past two decades. It now has the capability to attack the US.
Libya had a nuclear capability but this was surrendered to Bush during the Iraqi war. We call this weaponry, "WMD's."
France has a meager nuclear capability and is our new, best friend, according to Obama.
Great Britain has nuclear capabilities but its arsenal is small.
The U.S.A. has reduced its military to 435,000 ground troops (not enough to fight an agreessive war on one front - no "two front" capabilities are planned by the peaceniks running this Administration. Our Air Force is at is lowest armament since WW II and our Navy is at WW I standards.
Possessing several thousand nuclear weapons isn't enough for Smithson. How's that for a perspective?
ReplyDeleteNot when we have four enemy nations (one pending - Iran) who would use their weapons on us without hesitation. Russian has 8500 warheads, we have 7700 You can't have too many if you are one of the good guys.
Deletemoronic... how many times do we need to blow the world up?
DeleteI am certain your "PhD is mail order. What a ridiculous question. In case you haven't noticed, we don't blow any one up. Assured annihilation is the purpose for the arsenal. You destroy the US, its "back at ya," even if we are "dead." So far so good.
Delete