AnonymousApr 4, 2012 10:32 AM
The Heritage Foundation's 1989 report is considered to be the conceptual origin of the health insurance mandate. The core of the Affordable Care Act was an idea floated by President Nixon in 1974, touted by the Heritage Foundation in 1989, introduced by Newt Gingrich in 1993 and implemented by Mitt Romney in 2005.
Now that Obama has made it law... it's SOCIALISM!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6DrH6P9OC0
The concept of the individual health insurance mandate is considered to have originated in 1989 at the conservative Heritage Foundation. In 1993, Republicans twice introduced health care bills that contained an individual health insurance mandate. Advocates for those bills included prominent Republicans who today oppose the mandate including Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Charles Grassley (R-IA), Robert Bennett (R-UT), and Christopher Bond (R-MO). In 2007, Democrats and Republicans introduced a bi-partisan bill containing the mandate.
Now that Obama has made it law... it's SOCIALISM!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6DrH6P9OC0
The concept of the individual health insurance mandate is considered to have originated in 1989 at the conservative Heritage Foundation. In 1993, Republicans twice introduced health care bills that contained an individual health insurance mandate. Advocates for those bills included prominent Republicans who today oppose the mandate including Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Charles Grassley (R-IA), Robert Bennett (R-UT), and Christopher Bond (R-MO). In 2007, Democrats and Republicans introduced a bi-partisan bill containing the mandate.
My response:
Of course, "Anonymous" is a character descending upon this blog from Media Matters or MoveOn.org. This piece of literature has shown up on other blogs, as well. It is hardly original.
A few questions: The first and most important is this - "So what?"
A second question: "Are you saying that 'we' cannot change our mind?"
Third, why was the Heritage [so-called] model written up in only a few [nine] pages while ObamaCare began as a 2,700 page bill that no one read, and will be 100,000 pages when finally and fully written sometime after 2014? How is it that Anonymous thinks the two are the same? Why is it that Anonymous thinks this is even possibly true.
A fourth consideration is embedded in the following: if our side is responsible for the law as written by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, it appears that our side is best qualified to amend its inadequacies -- since it wasn't your idea, anyway.
Of course, "Anonymous" is a character descending upon this blog from Media Matters or MoveOn.org. This piece of literature has shown up on other blogs, as well. It is hardly original.
A few questions: The first and most important is this - "So what?"
A second question: "Are you saying that 'we' cannot change our mind?"
Third, why was the Heritage [so-called] model written up in only a few [nine] pages while ObamaCare began as a 2,700 page bill that no one read, and will be 100,000 pages when finally and fully written sometime after 2014? How is it that Anonymous thinks the two are the same? Why is it that Anonymous thinks this is even possibly true.
A fourth consideration is embedded in the following: if our side is responsible for the law as written by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, it appears that our side is best qualified to amend its inadequacies -- since it wasn't your idea, anyway.
Fifth, if this bill
is modeled from Heritage, why did Pelosi
tell us that we would not know what is in the bill until after it passes into
law?
Sixth, does
Anonymous not know that Obama opposed the individual mandate in debates with
Hillary Clinton, back in 2008?
The readership should know that this argument, written by Anonymous in ‘comments’ above, is a developing theme by the Democrats in
their effort to confuse the facts of the argument. It was nowhere around – as a popular Democrat
response – five weeks ago.
Finally, the
conservative revolution had its beginnings in 2009 in response to the Stimulus
union payback bill and the developing storm that is known as ObamaCare. The Republican members cited in the ‘comments’
above, were “Establishment,” in
2007. Today, tea-party conservatives control the narrative
within the GOP. It is they who are
opposed to idiocy that is the health care bill.
I don’t care who – within the GOP – supported the writing of a bill that
doubles or triples the size of the federal government. I don’t care.
Smithson - the hypocrite - believes it is not appropriate to brand the GOP as hypocritical for proposing and supporting an individual mandate, because The Tea Party - that now controls the GOP - doesn't approve of it today.
ReplyDeleteThat was just 20 yrs ago when the GOP proposed the mandate. Just a few years ago when their Presidential nominee Romney, put it into law.
But that doesn't stop Smithson refering to Democrats as the "The Southern Democrat KKK" ... something if true, was 70 -100 yrs ago.
Hypocrisy on display - Smithson is the poster child.
Hey Loser !! You forgot about Obama's hypocrisy in opposing the mandate back in 2008, just days before becoming president.
ReplyDeleteThe Southern Democrat KKK was killing civil rights workers in 1964. George Zimmerman is a registered Democrat.
Who's a foreign-born, brown-skinned, anti-war socialist who gave away health care?
ReplyDelete. . . the Bible says Jesus