Reuters falsely frames the "first set-back" for Trump's new immigration order.

Here is the headline in question: 

Steve Gorman / Reuters:
Trump's revised travel ban dealt first court setback

The truth of the matter is this:  The Court made a decision in favor of a single family that was in the problematic center of the first Executive Order,  a family concerned that the second order might leave them in this center,  again.  Understand that the wife/daughter left behind in Syria,  were being vetted for asylum in the US during Obama's final weeks in office.  

This sounds like a fair judgment, to me.    Again,  this was not a judgment against the larger Executive Order,  despite Reuters attempt at poisoning the voter pool.  

Now you know.