Reuters falsely frames the "first set-back" for Trump's new immigration order.
Here is the headline in question:
Steve Gorman / Reuters:
Trump's revised travel ban dealt first court setback
The truth of the matter is this: The Court made a decision in favor of a single family that was in the problematic center of the first Executive Order, a family concerned that the second order might leave them in this center, again. Understand that the wife/daughter left behind in Syria, were being vetted for asylum in the US during Obama's final weeks in office.
This sounds like a fair judgment, to me. Again, this was not a judgment against the larger Executive Order, despite Reuters attempt at poisoning the voter pool.
Now you know.