Bogus headlines designed to undermine Trump and the Conservative Nation. In other words, "Same old same old."

James Kirchick / Washington Post:
How Trump got his party to love Russia  

Do I really have to deal with this nonsense?  I don't think so. 

New York Times:
Trump Nominees' Filings Threaten to Overwhelm Federal Ethics Office

Just part of the Dems agenda for disruption.  They don't really care about ethics.  

2 comments:

  1. Any president that would defend Russia over evidence provided by his own intelligence agencies is a traitor. Plain and simple. Treason.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (a) No one is "defending" Russia.

      (b) There is nothing sacrosanct about any of our intel agencies and you know it. As a collective, they did not see 9/11 coming. You say they were wrong on WMD's, the reason for invading Iraq. The Russians AND Chinese have been hacking our computerized systems for decades, with the worst of their record being the last 10 years and no one has cared until Hillary needed an excuse for losing. October of 2014 saw the Russians steal the information from the White House computer systems but nothing was done about this. Why? The hacking took place just before the 2014 midterm landslide of the GOP. Obama was too busy playing games to fix the problem or retaliate.

      June: the records of 21.5 million people, including social security numbers, dates of birth, addresses, fingerprints, and security-clearance-related information, are stolen from the United States Office of Personnel Management. Most of the victims were employees of the United States government and unsuccessful applicants to it. This time, the blame fell on China.

      Delete