Obama agrees to a nuclear deal with Iran that does not include military site inspections.

Gil Ronen / Reuters:20 minutes ago
Report: Powers Give in - No Inspection of Iran's Nuke Facilities  —  P5+1 cave in to Iranian demands and will not insist on inspections of nuclear installations, says Channel 1.  —  Iranian FM Javad Zarif (R) at press conference announcing nuclear deal  —  The P5+1 countries led … 

Editor's notes:  Wow.  If this is true,  there is only one conclusion a thinking person can draw:  That Kerry/Obama simply do not care about the effectiveness of this "agreement,"  they just want to announce a deal.  
I cannot imagine anyone on the Left or the Right,  in our Congress,  agreeing to this idiocy.  If this gets approved by our Congress,  it will be the result of a Democrat push to do so with a little help for Establishment Republicans    . . . . . . .    if it gets approved.  I can't believe that "approval" is on the horizon.   

We all know that B Obama is sympathetic to certain Muslim realities,  especially when in conflict with Christianity.  We all know that Valerie Jarrett,  his closest confidant since before the marriage to Michelle, was born in Iran and has strong ties to international influences that are not,  typically,  pro-American.  

The last I heard,  this agreement will not be a written agree,  either.  Good grief,  how much of a buffoon is Der Leader?  

"Why?" you ask,  as to all this nonsense.  Simple:  Obama is pathological when it comes the notion of "fairness."  And it is not fair that Israel be the only Middle East power to have nuclear weapons.   That is what is going on,  here

4 comments:

  1. The negotiators from Great Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia in addition to the US and IAEA have put this framework together. To say the least, I have a lot more confidence in their expertise and objectivity than Republicans in Congress and right wing media who have made it plain that they will not even consider giving it a fair hearing. There's is no question that a negotiated agreement on this issue is better than war, so let's the rest of us insist it get a fair and rigorous hearing, including listening to our allies who incidentally live in the neighborhood with Iran.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You assume "war" as the only response to a bombing run of Iranian nuclear facilities. They were bombed years ago . . . . . no war. You think we should let them have nuclear weapons if Obama-speak fails?

      Delete
    2. But should we try?

      Delete
    3. You think we just started this process? Look, Obama wants to say that he did what GW Bush could not do. THAT is his legacy in all this. We have been talking for years and years . . . . time for action or a bunch of suicidal maniacs will have the ability to destroy Israel and more. You do believe Muslim are capable of suicidal warfare, right?

      Delete