Midknight Review -- new and revised: Obama agrees to a nuclear deal with Iran that does not include military site inspections.

Obama agrees to a nuclear deal with Iran that does not include military site inspections.

Gil Ronen / Reuters:20 minutes ago

Report: Powers Give in - No Inspection of Iran's Nuke Facilities — P5+1 cave in to Iranian demands and will not insist on inspections of nuclear installations, says Channel 1. — Iranian FM Javad Zarif (R) at press conference announcing nuclear deal — The P5+1 countries led …

Editor's notes: Wow. If this is true, there is only one conclusion a thinking person can draw: That Kerry/Obama simply do not care about the effectiveness of this "agreement," they just want to announce a deal.

I cannot imagine anyone on the Left or the Right, in our Congress, agreeing to this idiocy. If this gets approved by our Congress, it will be the result of a Democrat push to do so with a little help for Establishment Republicans . . . . . . . if it gets approved. I can't believe that "approval" is on the horizon.

We all know that B Obama is sympathetic to certain Muslim realities, especially when in conflict with Christianity. We all know that Valerie Jarrett, his closest confidant since before the marriage to Michelle, was born in Iran and has strong ties to international influences that are not, typically, pro-American.

The last I heard, this agreement will not be a written agree, either. Good grief, how much of a buffoon is Der Leader?

"Why?" you ask, as to all this nonsense. Simple: Obama is pathological when it comes the notion of "fairness." And it is not fair that Israel be the only Middle East power to have nuclear weapons. That is what is going on, here

4 comments:

AnonymousJune 29, 2015 at 12:55 AM
The negotiators from Great Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia in addition to the US and IAEA have put this framework together. To say the least, I have a lot more confidence in their expertise and objectivity than Republicans in Congress and right wing media who have made it plain that they will not even consider giving it a fair hearing. There's is no question that a negotiated agreement on this issue is better than war, so let's the rest of us insist it get a fair and rigorous hearing, including listening to our allies who incidentally live in the neighborhood with Iran.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Let's return the favor, shall we?

CLINTON: You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength. And you heard how the Republican members led by Mitch McConnell, the president really demeaned the confirmation process.

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."