Bush beats Obama for high "favorable" and, again, for a low "unfavorable."

CNN gives us the numbers.  Turns out that Obama scored 49 -49 for favorable rating and unfavorable rating.  

 Bush's "favorable" rating was 51%;  his unfavorable rating was a low 43%.  

 Hillary had a 46% favorable rating and a 50% unfavorable rating. 

She leads Paul by 1% . . . .   a virtual tie.

 She leads Rubio and Walker by 3 pts,  within the margin of error.  

 She does not break into the 50 percentile versus any of the top GOP opponents. 

She should be 7 to 10 points ahead of any of the GOP opponents,  at this early stage in the election cycle.  Instead,  and again,  she is below that mark   . . . . .    a very bad sign for the First Lady. 
at

4 comments:

  1. AnonymousJune 4, 2015 at 1:14 PM

    Obama +20 over Bush, comparing same point in presidency.
    Bush = loser

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/obama_bush_first_term_job_approval.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John SmithsonJune 4, 2015 at 2:08 PM

      So what?!! What you should care about is present time, instead of fighting battles you have lost, years and years ago. Think about this: You all spent millions of dollars and years of time, demonizing GW Bush, and still could not beat the man, in a presidential election. What's going to happen when the GOP runs a candidate that folks do not hate, whose reputation is not sullied by the Marxist/Socialist media? I am thinking we are about to find out . . . . viva-la a Reagan type landslide.

      Delete
  2. AnonymousJune 4, 2015 at 1:18 PM

    Correction:
    Clinton +6.8 over Walker
    Clinton +4.2 over Rubio
    Clinton +2.8 over Paul - (who will never be nominated)

    RCP poll of polls
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John SmithsonJune 4, 2015 at 2:16 PM

      You have no more reason to combine all the major polls and give them an average, than you have reason to average all the weather regions of the world and call that "global warming." I wrote that CNN gives Hillary a 1pt advantage over Paul, and a 3 point advantage over Walker and Rubio . . . all three results within the margin of error. And you can bet that Hillary and Company are paying attention to polling results published by her own media.

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)