Midknight Review -- new and revised: Hillary is being forced further and further to the Left. Is that what we want, as a people . . . . . . more broken promises added to a refusal to work with Congress? Enough is enough, no?

[Hillary] “I would do everything possible under the law to go even further [than Obama in use of executive amnesty orders] — there are more people, like many parents of DREAMers, and others with deep ties and contributions to our communities who deserve a chance to stay, and I would fight for them,” Clinton said Tuesday.

Editor's notes: Hillary is slowly figuring out how to justify folks voting for her. First, she has decided to run on feminist-equality issues, as she hopes to divide the electorate and appeal to the single women of this country. Clearly, she thinks that Obama's strategy of ignoring the blue collar vote will work for her. Obama got away with his anti-blue collar strategy, because he got a full turn-out from the black voter, and a huge population of Hispanics. If Hillary is going to succeed with a similar, strategy, she, too, will have to duplicate the turn-out numbers of the Hispanic/Black voting block.

With many of the GOP candidates promising to actually do something about the glaring immigration problem, there is reason to believe that many disappointed Hispanics, will turn to the GOP, in view of the fact that Obama played them like a fiddle back in 2008 and 2009.

Hillary has added a second rung to her platform . . . . . . . promising to extend the border debate to full citizenship for all, and, now, threatening in the above quote, to circumvent congress and grant this amnesty/citizenship for all via executive order. The Obama Administration has expressed doubt as to what Hillary thinks she can do with her use of executive order. Our question is this: do we want another president who has no respect for Constitutional law and order?

You do know that Obama has lost 55% of Supreme Court challenges to his nonsense, the worst record in the High Court, in American History? Does Hillary see this as a preferred political strategy?

So the question is this: will Hillary be forced to the Left for the sake of a place in history as a woman, and for no other reason?

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."

3 comments:

AnonymousMay 7, 2015 at 2:20 PM
He is becoming threatened by the impending presidency of Hillary Clinton. We can not allow any more GOP gains. The white christian party clearly does not represent America.
GOP:
99% white
100% christian
America:
62% white
70% christian

http://www.gallup.com/poll/160373/democrats-racially-diverse-republicans-mostly-white.aspx
AnonymousMay 8, 2015 at 12:51 PM
Tell Mr Anonymous that the white voting block is closer to 73% white. Of course that is changing, but not before the GOP has the opportunity to build a new consensus within the GOP. It is not race that extends into the future, at least, not for the GOP. Besides, 70% of all independents are white, and they are the single most important voting block in recent elections.