The "do-gooder" Left, the children of Flower Power, do not understand the importance of challenging those who would have authority over us. Pam Geller and the AP are a perfect example.

<<<  Understand that Geller is only doing what the Flower Children of the 60's and 70's were doing   . . . .  challenging those who would rule over us.  Every communist loving,  1960's type  (and they bragged about being communist and Maoists) had a bumper sticker on their crap-automobiles that read,  "Challenge Authority."  Now that they are in power,  these "heroes of the Left" have turned into authoritarian,  whiny-ass cowards who want to use the power they once rejected,  to silence those who oppose them. 

I remember the 60's hippie standing up in the public square,  screaming "F" this and "F" that,  just to make the point, "I have the right to say whatever I want."  Heck,  in 2003,  it was Hillary who screamed these words,  words she absolutely no longer believes:  ""I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." 

Clearly.  the Left was not principles in its descent back then,  or,  they would allow for the same principled debate as 55 year ago.    Today,  if Pam Geller was "slaughtered,"  as violent Islam promises,  the Left would simply shrug their shoulders and tell us,  "She brought it on herself."  That is the implied underpinnings of the AP article,  below.  In so doing,  the Left,  the pack of cowards they are,  would not fight radical Islam,  homeland,  and would sacrifice freedom for us all   . . . . .    in the homeland,  for the sake of "peace" and "tolerance."  THAT is the take-away,  here.   

Understand,  this is not speculation,  but dependable commentary.  Obama rewards deserters,  leaves patriots to die on rooftops in Benghazi while he sleeps,  walks away from the Pakistani doctor who identified Osama's hide-out,  leaving him to die in a Taliban prison,  and,  surrenders the war in Iraq and Afghanistan,  at the cost of more than 6,000 American lives,  all for the "sake of peace." 

I cannot stress this enough:  I am not fear-mongering;  I am not predicting anything.  This is the "here and now."  This is what the Left is about RIGHT THIS MOMENT.  Time for a change.  There is no place for this bunch in the land of the brave and the home of the free.  Let them go elsewhere to laugh at that motto.  They need to gone.  We should never confuse the refusal to fight with "peace." 

Let's make the change this coming election cycle. 

NEW YORK (AP) — Does Pamela Geller regret organizing the Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest that ended in gunfire?
No, she says confidently. In fact, she says, she probably saved lives by hosting the event and plans to have more just like it, with one difference: Next time, she'll be wearing a bulletproof vest.
"I will continue to speak in defense of freedom until the day I die," Geller said Thursday in an interview with The Associated Press, as a grim-looking personal security guard hovered nearby. "It's just that simple. It's not even a choice. It's a calling."
Geller has always hired armed security personnel to protect the scores of events she has spearheaded across the nation in recent years to decry Islamic extremism. But furor over Sunday's shooting in Garland, Texas, has led to a specific threat against Geller, posted on a website related to the Islamic State group, and the New York Police Department is taking it seriously. Now she doesn't travel anywhere without protection.
Geller said she believes she saved lives by hosting the contest because the two Muslim gunmen shot to death by police would have picked another soft target and killed innocent civilians.
"Would you regret saving lives?" she asked.
A master of rhetoric and clearly comfortable in the spotlight, the 56-year-old former media executive shifts easily from charming to combative. Her critics have called the cartoon contest needlessly provocative, practically an invitation for violence. But Geller argued that any blame should be focused on extremists who can't be criticized or lampooned without resorting to violence.
"Cartoons are political critique. It's a cartoon," she said. "Is that what we want to outlaw? We want to outlaw humor? We want to outlaw comedy? If you want to know who rules over you, find out who you cannot criticize."
Her activities have prompted the Southern Poverty Law Center to add her to its extremist files, calling her "the anti-Muslim movement's most visible and flamboyant figurehead."