How poorly run is the ObamaCare system? After 10 months, there [still] is no operational accounting and as to "wildly popular," 87% of enrollees are paid to sign up (it is called "sbusidies").

23 share
good intererst
Understand that the "back end" of the ObamaCare website is where all enrollment information is collected and transferred to the several insurance companies.  It is, also,  where enrollment information is used to give an accounting for such things as enrollment numbers, profitability (libs would prefer the term "sustainability'), insured demographics,  and the like.  Sadly,  this "back half" is not, yet,  "up and running."  

You may not know this,  but most,  if not all,  bonafide enrollment information is being transferred by hand because of the systemic issues involving the final stages of the website.   

In this video,  we have a spokesman for Aetna admitting that the company does not know the demographics of its newly insured population (whether young or old,  healthy or sick).  He does know that the 600,000+  enrollees are more old and sick,  than otherwise.  He also knows that 87% of those enrolled are subsidized.  And,  if you listen carefully,  you will realize that Aetna hopes for a 3 to 5 percent profit margin,  but,  currently,  it is not earning any money from ObamaCare.  

Medicare owes itself 47 trillion dollars and Social Security owes itself (they call it "unfunded liabilities") 17 trillion at last count  --  neither program would be viable in the private market or in a government circumstance that does not invent money.  But,  because we, the United States of  America and its "dollar,"   are the world's currency and can print money because of that fact,  we think we don't need our do-gooder, welfare programs to be sustainable.  The profit-hating Marxists among us,  see no need to balance budgets or protect profit margins at some level.    

Most Americans do not realize that Medicare is the heart and soul of ObamaCare and is broken beyond repair,  as a financial system.  There is no reason to believe that ObamaCare will not add another 50 trillion to Medicare debt,  in the coming four decades, just as Medicare has done in its first four decades.  The problem?  Too large a population demand on the system.  The fact of the matter is this:  Big Government does not work  . . . . .   period.  Such is not even debatable.  The evidence is "in,"  and the conclusions have been clear for a generation or more. 



Update:  A failure of management by the Obama administration led to the disastrous rollout of the ObamaCare website and caused the government to incur tens of millions in additional costs, according to a congressional watchdog report released Wednesday.

In a recent report,  the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has concluded after a months-long investigation into the rocky rollout of ObamaCare – the website, that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ failure to establish “effective planning or oversight practices” was to blame for website’s myriad problems after it was launched.  Mismanagement and stupidity has added “tens of millions in additional costs”  totally  $840 million and counting. 

The back end of the site remains broken,  and – perhaps – beyond repair. 

The “cost increases” include those for the glitchy computerized sign-up system for consumers, which ballooned from $56 million to more than $209 million from Sept. 2011 to Feb. 2014. The cost of the electronic backroom for verifying applicants' information jumped from $30 million to almost $85 million.  This is the “back end” of the web site,  and,  as mentioned above,  it remains broken in spite of a $175 million dollar bill for fixes to the website.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, one of the lawmakers who requested the investigation, said in a statement Wednesday that the report “confirms our worst fears.    Millions of taxpayer dollars were wasted to build a website that didn't work, all because of bureaucratic incompetence,” he said.

Over the months,  a reported 8 million American’s have signed up for coverage,  but as many as 4 million people may not have coverage,  at all,  due to lost application information and the a failure in the subsidies program. 

The Associated Press, Fox News and Midknight Review all  contributed to this report


No comments:

Post a Comment