We are no longer a nation ruled by law and order. Doubt this? Maybe you should consider the following:

As you read the following story,  keep in mind that the Progessive/Libs started this practice of “federal nullification” with the blessings of Clinton,  Bush 43, and Hussein Obama,  as the federal government turned a blind eye to the 50 or 60 “sanctuary cities” in this nation.  In fact,  the State of Oregon,  is officially “sanctuary” in violation of federal law.  Obama’s EPA was given a 9-0 drubbing by the Supreme Court in the Sacketts versus the EPA case, decided in March of 2012 (see Pacific Legal.org) ,  and decided to simply ignore that

Our presidents ignore this law all the time.  All they
have to do is call it a "police action" or some such
thing,  and,  walla, they get to war with anyone they
choose  . . .   all because they are lawless - the whole
damn bunch of them.  

decision and proceed with its own agenda, anyway.  No one is in jail because it is not a crime,  apparently,  to intentionally  violate constitutional law.  That we are a nation build on compliance to law,  is, perhaps,  the biggest joke of all.  This article, below,  is evidence of that fact.  Understand that this very article was “taken down” on Drudge,  before we could read it,  this morning.  I found it at SF Gate,  already in print,  before the Censor Police could get to it.  I give you the first page of a two paged article.  You can find the entire article here:  http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Federal-nullification-efforts-mounting-in-states-4613832.php

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Imagine the scenario: A federal agent attempts to arrest someone for illegally selling a machine gun. Instead, the federal agent is arrested — charged in a state court with the crime of enforcing federal gun laws.

Farfetched? Not as much as you might think.

The scenario would become conceivable if legislation passed by Missouri's Republican-led Legislature is signed into law by Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon.

The Missouri legislation is perhaps the most extreme example of a states' rights movement that has been spreading across the nation. States are increasingly adopting laws that purport to nullify federal laws — setting up intentional legal conflicts, directing local police not to enforce federal laws and, in rare cases, even threatening criminal charges for federal agents who dare to do their jobs.

An Associated Press analysis found that about four-fifths of the states now have enacted local laws that directly reject or ignore federal laws on marijuana use, gun control, health insurance requirements and identification standards for driver's licenses. The recent trend began in Democratic leaning California with a 1996 medical marijuana law and has proliferated lately in Republican strongholds like Kansas, where Gov. Sam Brownback this spring became the first to sign a measure threatening felony charges against federal agents who enforce certain firearms laws in his state.

Some states, such as Montana and Arizona, have said "no" to the feds again and again — passing states' rights measures on all four subjects examined by the AP — despite questions about whether their "no" carries any legal significance.

"It seems that there has been an uptick in nullification efforts from both the left and the right," said Adam Winkler, a professor at the University of California at Los Angeles who specializes in constitutional law.

Yet "the law is clear — the supremacy clause (of the U.S. Constitution) says specifically that the federal laws are supreme over contrary state laws, even if the state doesn't like those laws," Winkler added.

The fact that U.S. courts have repeatedly upheld federal laws over conflicting state ones hasn't stopped some states from flouting those federal laws — sometimes successfully.

About 20 states now have medical marijuana laws allowing people to use pot to treat chronic pain and other ailments — despite a federal law that still criminalizes marijuana distribution and possession. Ceding ground to the states, President Barack Obama's administration has made it known to federal prosecutors that it wasn't worth their time to target those people.

Federal authorities have repeatedly delayed implementation of the 2005 Real ID Act, an anti-terrorism law that set stringent requirements for photo identification cards to be used to board commercial flights or enter federal buildings. The law has been stymied, in part, because about half the state legislatures have opposed its implementation, according to theNational Conference of State Legislatures.

About 20 states have enacted measures challenging Obama's 2010 health care laws, many of which specifically reject the provision mandating that most people have health insurance or face tax penalties beginning in 2014.

After Montana passed a 2009 law declaring that federal firearms regulations don't apply to guns made and kept in that state, eight other states have enacted similar laws. Gun activistGary Marbut said he crafted the Montana measure as a foundation for a legal challenge to the federal power to regulate interstate commerce under the U.S. Constitution. His lawsuit was dismissed by a trial judge but is now pending before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.  . . . . . .   click on the link, above, for the rest of the story.