Midknight Review -- new and revised: An irrelevant president appoints a partisan hack to an irrelevant position as the head of the National Security Council. No complaint from here, because this appointment means absolutely nothing.

In an in-your-face appointment, B Obama is appointing Susan Rice as head of the National Security Council.

The news, as of yesterday, has the Capitol Police hassling teaparty folks applying for demonstrations scheduled for June 19^th - a process that should not take more than a week. It has been more than 5 weeks without approval, and the Police, now, demand to review teaparty websites before finalizing their approval. What does this have to do with Susan Rice? Nothing except for the fact that this Police action comes from Obama, no doubt, and is part and parcel to the war Hussein Obama has declared against conservatives in this country.

Susan Rice’s appointment is a second proof of his determined and demonstrable angst against the Right. Pardon us (the Right) for objecting and rebelling against this so-called president. Millions of folks from the Right, voted for this under-qualified Chicago politician, only to be spite on, almost immediately after taking office.

Understand that Rice was the “point man” in the PR efforts to explain Benghazi, appearing on five network programs in a single Sunday, blaming the Benghazi murders on a video trailer that no one in the region actually saw. “In fact, this was not a preplanned attack” were some of her words, on that Sunday, 5 days after we can prove that she knew otherwise. What you do not know about this partisan jerk, is that during the Clinton years, she objected to using the term “genocide” in reference to the 1994 Rwanda genocide, arguing that “If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November (midterm) election.” Of course, the Clinton Administration did nothing about the Rwanda slaughter, but lost in the midterm, anyway, in one of the most historic butt-whippings in American history.

She is a proven partisan, caring more for the partisan effects of foreign policy decisions than the truth, and has been a “proven partisan” for more than two decades. But who cares about a National Security position? I certainly don’t. I no longer trust any spokesperson for this Administration. While this clown in Our White House continues his divisive ways, he is only proving himself to be (more and more) irrelevant, and this appointment only continues his downward trend.

__________________

For more background, go to White House Dossier.com.

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."

Midknight Review -- new and revised

An irrelevant president appoints a partisan hack to an irrelevant position as the head of the National Security Council. No complaint from here, because this appointment means absolutely nothing.

No comments:

Post a Comment

copyright policy of the original Midknight Review