Just 10 weeks after Obama seized power as our first revenge president, his Homeland Security department, issued a report (April 7, PDF here) , proving, of course, the revenge nature of this presidency as an undeniable fact of the Administration from the very beginnings of this [revenge] presidency. The report was a well designed attack - Obama’s first of many - against teaparty folks who were only known, at the time, as “right wing extremists.” Newt Gingrich issued an immediate response: "The person who drafted the outrageous homeland security memo smearing veterans and conservatives should be fired."
Understand that Obama was sworn into office on January 20, of 2009, and this report was completed and ready for publication just 9 weeks later. Again, he had it in his head, to divide the nation from the beginning of his term as president and the date of this ridiculous report is proof of that fact.
In the report, right wing radicals were defined in these
words: " . . . broadly divided into
those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based
on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are
mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local
authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups
and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or
immigration." (Quote taken from cBSNews - please note the small “c”).
Coming forward to yesterday (1/17/13), the Washington Times informs its readers that
West Point and military leadership are being educated against the conservative
constituency of this nation.
The Times article refers to these conservatives as the “anti
federalist movement,” not understanding
that “federalist” defines the individual states, not the federal government. That important discrepancy aside, we have this statement in the Times article:
The [West Point] center — part of the institution
where men and women are molded into Army officers — posted the report Tuesday.
It lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a
racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist
movement.” . . . . . its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of
people it considers “far right.”
It says anti-federalists “espouse strong convictions
regarding the federal government believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural
tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally,
they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government.
Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against
the federal government [and] its proxies in law enforcement.”
The report also draws a
link between the mainstream conservative movement and the violent “far right,”
and describes liberals as “future oriented” and conservatives as living in the
past. . . . . . . Debates over
appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the
realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some
cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed
against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.
(Source: Washington Times). The disturbing fact of the matter is this: such an effort as described above, if left to its own increases, will sour the military against the people of the United States, and give them the psychological justification to "defend the [corrupt] system" against those who object to its take over by subversives dressed as Progressives."
The report perfectly describes the anti american tea party. Tim McVeigh types.
ReplyDeleteNothing but lies coming from Anonymous. That is why she remains "anonymous." There is no meaningful discussing with someone who will not identify herself. Profile -- angry black who hates America and will say and do anything to make her point. Thus, this McVeigh crap.
ReplyDelete