Rather than having "the church" pay for contraception, he now requires "the church" pay for insurance that, in turn, supplies contraception. Soooo, exactly what has changed?

Talking point #331:  forcing churches to buy insurance coverage that advances the premature deaths of 1.4 million unborn, each year,  is no different from forcing churches to pay for such coverage,  directly. 

Just minutes ago, during the nine o'clock hour,  Obama held a short press conference in which he  pretended to have made an "accommodation" for religious liberty,  something he wants us to believe that he was concerned with,  all along  --  a blatant and in in-your-face lie.  Hopefully,  he will not survive the hypocrisy demonstrated over the past week and a half.    

He mentioned the fact that we live in a "pluralistic" society,  that we will not always agree.  He failed to reference the Constitutional battle involved or his manifest disregard for that document in his decision making process. He failed to note the fact that he does not care what others think of his policies.  

To think that the "50% of women under 30" struggle to afford contraception (as he suggested this morning)  is an idiot's argument.  "The pill" is offered free in clinics all over this nation.  He speaks of the "fundamental right " of women to make their own health care decisions.  But "the pill" is not a part of that discussion because this law changes nothing regarding the pill.  It is already free everywhere,  so why the law?   Clearly,  this was more about bring religious institutions under his thumb.  

Also,  there was no mention of  rewriting the law to exclude this controversy from becoming an issue again, say . . . .   after the election.  Understand this:  the cat is already out of the bag as relates his relationship to "the church."  

Rather than having "the church" pay for contraception,  he now requires  "the church" pay for health insurance that,  in turn, supplies contraception.  Soooo,  exactly what has changed?