Origninal Text:
The headline reads, IT'S STARTING: Feds to design health insurance for the masses... Look, we already know that ObamaCare will cost the taxpayer between 1.5 trillion dollars over the next ten years (CBO) and 3 trillion (accordingot Max Baucus, D-Mon). More than this, Obama raped the Medicare system via half a trillion in cuts to that program to "balance" out ObamaCare.
Now we have this recent headline. Understand that we are talking about 68 million people, about the same size as the Baby Boomer crowd coming into the system. AND, these 68 people million are not figured into the cost of ObamaCare. How many trillion will this cost -- and it is not paid for at all.
I find this all most incredible. In the remaining 13 months (we hope) of this Administration,
- we HAVE Harry Reid changing the rules in the Senate in an effort of pushing out GOP influence, just as the Dems did back in 2009-2010.
- We have Stimulus II (aka the Americas Jobs Act), a scheme that is nothing short of an effort to replenish the coffers of the teacher's unions ($38 billion to that union collective) and fund work programs that benefit union labor (50 billion stinking dollars) TO THE EXCLUSION OF PRIVATE CONTRACTING FIRMS.
- Let's not forget the hidden costs and programs embedded in this bill: no telling what is hidden in the bill. Understand that eight billion was hidden in the ObamaCare legislation to fund the bill, itself . . . . . money unknown to the public until after the bill was signed. Expect the same sort of crap in this bill.
- Something new: an effort on the part of Obama, his media, and his labor unions to take advantage of young people, those currently demonstrating for change. Understand this: politically involved youth seldom know what is really going on, and how could they? They have no historical perspective. But, go ahead and tell them that and see what happens. What they do not get is this: they are being used by Big Labor and Big Government just as Big Government used the youth of the 60's and 70's. It is deja vu all over again, dude (you know who you are).
They are against "corporations." So how do you have a world without corporations unless you are a communist, seriously? They are against "profit" but have no idea as to running the world without the "profit" factor. They talk of being the "99%" when, in fact, they are part of the bottom 50 percent of American wage earners. They pretend to represent "the American people" when only a few thousand of them, across the nation, are currently participating in these demonstrations.
Should conservatives dismiss their complaints, out of hand? I say, "no!!" While my world is a "black and white"world, perhaps a better representation should be "a red, white and blue" world. Hang on to that thought. I just might change some of my rhetoric, here at Midknight Review.
One thing I know for sure, if I were to take a sign to these demonstrations, a sign that read, "Screw Obama," I would not expect anyone to come up to me and say, "Good point. I am coming over to your side."
Hi John!
ReplyDeleteMe again. I've been reading your posts about the Obama's jobs bill and it seems like its got a plenty of holes in it, but you are only representing one side of the bill. There are good things in there. I'm a little pressed for time so I won't go into detail. I just wanted to drop a note and ask what your beef with unions is? I've noticed you have a lot of negative things to say about unions and it seems like you have some deep seeded animosity towards unions. I was just hoping for a little insight.
Hello Paul. Hey, I have been riding. Went to Yosemite and points north. My bike is a VTX 1800 -- almost too big for this old man. But I dig it, big time. Anyway, I will get back to this. There really are several reasons, a couple quite personal. Talk about this soon.
ReplyDeleteWhy I am not a union guy
ReplyDeleteMy first job while in high school was moving homes out of the Whiskytown Dam site in northern California. Because we were not union, we had to stand guard with guns to keep the unions thugs from coming in and setting fire to these homes. That was 1962. I have toughened up a lot since then, but I was one scared kid, then. I never forgot the union threats.
Ten years later, I was a heavy equipment operator. The union wanted several of us to join their union. We said "no." The union sent thugs out, at night, and put raw eggs and sugar in our diesel tanks. It cost the thousands of dollars.
I believe that it is wrong, on its face, to take over a man's business and that is exactly what unions try to do. They wait for somehow else to risk their capital, build the factory, get the permits, mess with the hippy environmentalists, hire a sales force, spend money on advertisement, buy inventory and equipment and begin to make money, THEN, they vote themselves into unionization and begin to tell the owner what he will have to pay, how much of his profit he will have to surrender, how much he must spend on shared retirement and so on.
I am a hard working son of a gun. I went broke once, during Carter, and borrowed thousands in another year to pay for the salaries of my two employees. I actually made no money that year and the guys made $20,000 plus (this was 15 years ago). To think that I could be put in a situation where I take and pay for all that is necessary to start a business and, then, have that business fall into the hands of a pac of strangers is not something that even remotely sounds "American." I have always said, "You don't like it, go start your own stinking business." Guess what, "they" never do. They just wait for others, and then take it away from them . . . . ala GM and its front line shareholders.