9/11 Responders bill passes congress with billions saved in the negotiations. Hats off to the GOP.

Update: 1:55 pm pst, 12/22/2010: it now appears that the final cost of the bill is 4.2 billion dollars, down from an original total of 8.4 billion. GOP leadership courageously stood their ground, fighting both for the passage of the bill while seeking to restrain spending. They did exactly that, extending the no-cost care to the Responders while saving the taxpayers 4.2. billion bucks. This act of astonishing leadership in the face of criticism from those of us (Midknight Review and others included) who did not know what was going on behind closed doors is a tribute to the New GOP and should encourage us all as we approach their time in Congress.

Let's see if any of the GOP's critics will man up to being wrong.

We are wondering if the NY Times article, How did Republicans End Up Against 9/11 Responders Bill, will receive the same self-criticism seen here at Midknight Review. Turns out they were absolutely wrong in their summation.

Original Post:
First reports about the passage of the 9/11 First Responders bill has the cost cut to 1 billion dollars, per Fox News and 4.2 billion dollars per ABC News. We will carry the corrected report on this when it sorts itself out in our update.

Understand this, the original Democrat bill would have cost the American taxpayer more than 7 billion dollars. Further, the reader needs to know that the bill's last minute scheduling should be credited to those who control congress, namely the leaders in the 111th congress and the Democrat Party. They could have dealt with this matter two years ago, but chose to pass onto its list of "cram down" legislation, mocking the American voter at every turn and ignoring the needs of the Responders.

The fact that this bill's last minute debate is in the Marxist controlled media is per the design of the Democrat congress in an effort to demonize the cost minded GOP.

Midknight Review has been critical of the GOP because of the appearance of being more concerned with dollars than the health of the Responders. You can see our two articles on this matter on the "scrolldown."

Now that the compromise has been made and billions have been saved per a Republican principled negotiation with the spending freaks in the Democrat Party, we criticize our own reporting . . . . . we should have waited, as we unusually do.

This bill, one that Obama will use as a feather in his legislative cap, is much more the result of the GOP and its no-nonsense approach to compassionate legislative consideration and responsible tax management -- something that has been totally none-existent for two full years.

Will Jon Stewart admit to his ill founded criticism? How about the mouth of the South, Shepard Smith? Of course not !!

We (I) proudly stand alone in our repentant self-abasement.

Best Headline of the Month if not the Year. It involves Julius "Pretty Boy" Genachowski and Matt Drudge.

Understand that this young Marxist punk is the Chairman of the FCC, Julius "Pretty Boy" Genachowski'.

Because of a successful internal vote (3-2), he has just ordered the FCC/FTC entities to establish regulations designed to control the internet. It is our understanding [from early reports] that the FCC intends to channel all bloggers to its administration, making it a requirement that each apply for permission to blog and that this permission be issued from the Federal Government and its parrot agencies, the FCC and/or the FTC.

Our favorite Liberation Marxist, Barack Obama, defends this decision by arguing that these regulations will insure freedom of the Internet, that this process guarantees free access to the world wide web.

Sounds good (?). Geeeesh.

Understand that this "free" unregulated access is for the consumer only . . . . the surfer/researcher of the Internet. It is not "free" and unregulated access if you are a web-site owner, a blogger or political pundit. These folks, will need to apply to the Feds for permission to speak out on issues. Undoubtedly, this will eventually cost site owners/managers money and they run the risk of being cut off without notice, as is often the case now, if they use words or phraseology that is deemed "unacceptable" to the Federal Government.

If you do not see the problem, you are either Shepard Smith of FoxNews or an unmitigated political moron.

Soooo, from our perspective, Julius Genachowski is a traitor. The award winning headline celebrates Genachowski's siezure of the internet, a move that violates the second amendment and is clearly an anti-free speech move on the part of those currently in power. A Washington Federal District Court of Appeals has already told the FCC it does not have this power. But who, in the Democrat Party, cares about a Court decision or the will of the people?

The good news in all this Marxist crap is this: the incoming congress has 60 days to investigate this FCC decision. At the end of that period of time, it can pass a Resolution of Disapproval. Finally, it can chose to refuse funding for this atrocity.

All of the above is the "set-up" for our choice of "Best Headline of the Month" Although this is a WSJ article, the headline , apparently, is one generated by Matt Drudge. Here is the award winning headline:


When you click on the hyperlink immediately above, you will find a different headline, one that is of the WSJ's creation, thus, our award being given to Matt Drudge.

How is the Christmas season going for retailers?

It is proving to be the best of holiday seasons. Internet sales are up 12%. Walk-in foot traffic is up 4% . Understand that Americans have been saving money at record rates for the past two years. Fear of what Obama is doing in the "spending department" is part of the reason for this increase. As a result, individual saving totals have increased by 4% and folks have more to spend as the Christmas season continues.

It is proving to be the best Christmas season for retail sales since 2006, back in the day when things were great and unemployment was at 4.6%.

We expect the economy to improve. That is what economies do, especially capitalist economies. Now that the tax question is settled for two more years, we expect to see a marked increase in the recovery. Healthcare continues to be a negative influence as to hiring purposes and that is something the new congress has to be concerned about, since Obama and Comrades are not.

Understand that if the economy does experience a significant recovery after the 112th Congress is installed, Obama's claim's for success will be muted.

At any rate, it is a good season for most retailers. Many folks are in a bad way, however, and we all need to make ourselves aware of their distress. Let's not forget that 23 million folks are unemployed or underemployed. Christmas spending is not being done by them. Rather, it is the remaining work force -- people feeling more secure in their job circumstance, and senior citizens (Grandma and Grandpa).

Midknight Review is taking Friday - Sunday off. No Christmas blessings here but something even better.

Thank you for our best year of the three we have been in existence.

The original Midknight Review was shut down by Google on December 24 of 2008, three hours after ranting about a Christmas Eve vote that gave Obama the power of the purse via Fannie and Freddie funds. Midknight Review - new and revised began two days later, December 26. We had zero readership and had lost more than 2200 articles -- intellectual property.

A year later, we are about to take a break, having published 2307 articles on the main page. We will be back in the saddle Monday the 27th.

You are invited to read our work including the nine pages at the top of our main page. Before the end of this year, we will hit 40,000 page views since the month of June. We are small time but a part of a much larger network.

Next week, we plan to feature year end lists, predictions, and insights that may prove valuable to the political junkie.

I do not wish God's blessings on you all because that happened more than 2,000 years ago. My prayer is that you all will do what you have do to find that blessing in your lives, today.

ThinkProgress should spend more time in the donut shop and leave real political commentary to those who are in the know.

Update 2:44 pm pst, 12/22/2010: Midknight Review should have waited on its criticism of the GOP in this matter. We could not have been more off base. Shepard Smith was no more correct in his blowhard criticism of the GOP that were we. Read our correction here.

Fox News' Shep Smith Shames Coburn For Blocking 9/11 Bill: ‘This Is The Senator’ Blocking ‘Necessary Funding’
— It appears even loyal Fox News has turned on Senate Republicans for their obstruction of the 9/11 first responders bill. Fox & Friends demanded the bill be passed . . . .

Editor's notes: the above headline comes from a Marxist blog, ThinkProgress, and reflects as uninformed Leftist opinion as one can find on the net. The donut eater who is "ThinkProgress," does not spend his working hours watching/listening to FoxNews. I do.** Fox has not deserted the Republican cause nor is Fox critical of GOP's handling of the 9/11 bill.

Shepard Smith is critical of the GOP on this issue but Shepard Smith has been a blowhard news caster on Fox from day one. Smith has made it clear that he is no fan of conservative politics. He frequ ently invites folks onto his news cast for the purpose of humiliating them before his national televised audience. He loves "ambush" interviews and uses this "surprise attack" methods frequently. He has no respect for non-Roman Catholic religious fundamentalism, the conservative abortion debate. He is pro-marijuana legalization but without having an understanding of the issues that make this potential legislation a serious mis-step should it ever be implemented. Our chief complaint is that he is arrogant in his commentary and thoughtless in his rhetoric. He certainly does not understand the critical nature of the ideological conflict. He has no clue what Obama, Schumer, Frank, Pelosi, and other dedicated socialists are about.

All in all, we are saying that Smith is not Fox. In fact, it is a misnomer to claim that "Fox News," as a news agency, is supportive of any political party. Of course, Fox has Hannity, as partisan a Republican as there is. Glenn Beck is not a Republican. Bill O'Reilly is not a Republican. The morning shows are, indeed, fair and balanced. Greta is not a Republican and often floats to the Left. Megyn Kelly is conservative but not partisan. Geroldo Rivera is a flaming liberal on nearly all issues. Chris Wallace and Bret Baier run excellent shows and are hardly partisan in their presentations. Juan Williams is a full-time liberal advisor on Fox. Imus, on FoxBusiness, is much more liberal than conservative, on issue, and he has a three hour show each and every day. In fact, FoxBusiness is equally divided between conservative and liberal financial opinion.

Our point? Let's not use Fox's chief blowhard as someone typical of FoxNews programming and thought.

Understand, that Smith happens to be on the right side of the 9/11 Responders debate but he remains a political moron on issues. It is just luck that finds him on the right side of anything.

**Note: equal time is given to Morning Joe on MSNBC, John King at CNN. We don't listen to network programming at all. Our news portal collective includes Memeoramdum in spite of its Far Left headline postings.

Midknight Review has a word for the Lame Duckers -- Pass the stinking 9/11 bill.

Update: 2:42 pst 12/22/2010: We should have waited in our criticism. Turns out we could not have been more off the mark. See our explanation here.

Update: 5:14am, pst, 12/22/2010:
I woke up to a gathering of First Responders making their case [on FoxNews] for the passage of the 9/11 bill. Understand that most have insurance coverage through their union associations, but these benefits do not begin to cover the costs accruing because of the radical nature of illness suffered. One firefighter pointed to the sad fact that he had attended 44 funerals since 9/11, funerals of First Responders who died because of air breathed as they worked to rescue folks on that sad day.

Understand that both parties are to blame for this legislative shame. The Democrats had four years of Congressional control to deal with this problem and did nothing until this last minute. The GOP is now insisting on paying for this bill when they approved of a tax bill [two weeks ago] without covering the cost of same.

To the GOP: Sometimes, politics is nothing more than perception. This is one of those times. Pass the bill and move away from this PR nightmare. When you reassemble, cut cost with this bill specifically in mind and claim that victory. The Dems do not care about these folks. They only care about "political advantage." Do not give these nothing-burger impostors any satisfaction. And know this, you should have been the leaders in this legislation.

Want to pay for this 6.2 billion dollar expense? Well, there are more than 200 billion dollars "left over" in the TARP bill. And where is Obama on this matter? He knows full well that we can pass for the bill AND pay for it at the same time. And Jon Stewart. Where the hell was Jon Stewart 3 years ago or even last year. We are glad that he has joined the good guys, but, again, no one is without blame. That includes this editor.

Original post:
I am as conservative as one gets, but I know how ridiculous the GOP looks in saying "no" to hundreds of First Responders. Put yourself in the shoes of these great Americans. Their medical bills are eating them alive. They have been dealing with this issue, in increasing measure, for 9 years and it is time for these folks to get the financial help they need. The bill will cost us all about 6 billion bucks and, sure, it may have "stuff" written into the law that no of us want.

But nothing seems more important to me than the critical needs of these responders.

Look, I am one of a few who thinks the American Veteran deserves just about anything he asks for because he was willing to put his life on the line for $1,200 a months.

Pass the stinking bill !!

Midknight Review disappointed in this Drudge headline:


Holder warns of threat within, 'radical' citizens

That is the headline found on Drudge, this morning. In fact, yesterday, the headline simply read "Holder warns of threat within." Matt Drudge added 'radical citizens,' the implied message being this -- it is no longer "radical Islam" we are worried about, but a "radicalized citizenry." Drudge is one of our news portals. He does not need to enhance the headlines he chooses to feature in his daily report.

The problem with this implication is found in a reading of the article to which Drudge linked. The news story is actually an ABC story found here. We note that the ABC headline is not the same as Drudge. More than that, we have this quote from the ABC story.

In the last 24 months, Holder said, 126 people have been indicted on terrorist-related charges, Fifty of those people are American citizens.

"I think that what is most alarming to me is the totality of what we see, the attorney general said. "Whether it is an attempt to bomb the New York City subway system, an attempt to bring down an airplane over Detroit, an attempt to set off a bomb in Times Square ... I think that gives us a sense of the breadth of the challenges that we face, and the kinds of things that our enemy is trying to do."

Holder says many of these converts to al Qaeda have something in common: a link to radical cleric Anwar Al Awlaki, an American citizen himself.

Understand that we are no friend of ABC news or Eric Holder. The former is into the defeat of America as we have known it and the later is a Dufus. But !! facts are facts and Holder, at least in this article, appears to "get it" when it comes to the internal national threat that is before us, call it what you will. Can Holder's DOJ do more? Absolutely. Is he confused as to the religious nature of the enemy? Yes. Are mixed messages being sent by Obama and Holder as to Islam's complicity in their war of terror against the United States? Definitely.

But, at least, he understands the seriousness of the physical threat.

What Stock Market strategy worked best this past year? We have the answer.

Understand that this editor is more the financial novice than he should be. Any and all stock market commentary or advice found here at Midknight Review is borne of the opinions of those other than this editor, those who are, indeed, in the "know."

Case in point: this post.

The question put forth in our headline has this answer:

Passive investors did better than money managers.

Sources: FoxBusinessNews, the Financial Times.

I am thinking that if you do not know what our answer means, you would do better with an investment increase at home, investing more time with the old lady. Guaranteed, that has as much or more promise for happiness as anything you might do on the Market, either in "passives" or "management."

In summary, our advice is this: manage the home fires as you passively consent to taking out the trash or collecting all those coffee cups in your truck. When our ladies are happy, we are happy.

Meet Allen West. Honestly, does he sound like a wingnut to you?

Allen West is one of our newest US Representatives. Thoughtful and well spoken, we hope we are seeing a rising star in the GOP. Hear what he has to say about our struggle against Islam.



Allen is out of Florida. You will be hearing more from Col. West as time goes on, to be sure.

National Education Association has become a dispensary for radicals. Here is proof.

Guess where we found this rhetorical trash? On site at the NEA - National Education Association. Click on this link for the NEA.

A Resource for Every Organizer & Anyone Contemplating Action in Their Community

NEA recommends the following Saul Alinsky books to those members of our Association who are involved in grassroots organizing, especially Association Representatives (ARs) — also known as building reps or shop stewards — and leaders at local affiliates.

Saul Alinsky is widely recognized as the father of, and pre-imminent expert in, grassroots organizing, which is why we recommend that ARs and local leaders become familiar with his theories & materials.

Alinsky’s writings have been called the “mother’s milk of the left,” however in an ironic homage, the conservative right has borrowed a page or two from the Alinsky playbook. Tea Party leader and self-described “conservative radical” Michael Patrick Leahy, for example, has authored a book based on Alinsky’s teachings: “Rules for Conservative Radicals.”

We hope that ARs and local leaders of all political stripes will discern from Alinsky’s books grassroots organizing strategies that will best help us bring our members together around the common goal of improving public education.

Reveille for Radicals

by Saul Alinsky
Vintage; Reissue edition (October 23, 1989)
Buy It

Rules for Radicals

by Saul Alinsky
Vintage; Reissue edition (October 23, 1989)
Buy It

Saul Alinsky wrote the book on American radicalism - two books, in fact: a 1945 best-seller, "Reveille for Radicals" and "Rules for Radicals" in 1971. The "Reveille" title page quotes Thomas Paine... "Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul."

Saul Alinsky, who was a labor and civil-rights activist from the 1910's until he died in 1972, has written here a guidebook for those who are out to change things. He sets down what the goal is: a society where people are free to live, and also aren't starving in the streets. A society where there is legal and economic justice. Then he sets out to say how to get there.

Alinsky spends a lot of time critiquing the idea that "The end does not justify the means." What end? What means? He feels that there are circumstances where one can and should use means that in other circumstances would be unethical. I am not sure I agree, but Alinsky certainly speaks with the voice of experience.

Alinsky's goal seems to be to encourage positive social change by equipping activists with a realistic view of the world, a kind of preemptive disillusionment. If a person already knows what evil the world is capable of, then perhaps the surprise factor can be eliminated, making the person a more effective activist. Alinsky further seems to be encouraging the budding activist not to worry to much about getting his or her hands dirty. It's all a part of the job, he seems to say.

Alinsky, the master political agitator, tactical planner and social organizer didn't mince words...

"Liberals in their meetings utter bold works; they strut, grimace belligerently, and then issue a weasel-worded statement 'which has tremendous implications, if read between the lines.' They sit calmly, dispassionately, studying the issue; judging both sides; they sit and still sit.

"The Radical does not sit frozen by cold objectivity. He sees injustice and strikes at it with hot passion. He is a man of decision and action. There is a saying that the Liberal is one who walks out of the room when the argument turns into a fight.

"Society has good reason to fear the Radical. Every shaking advance of mankind toward equality and justice has come from the Radical. He hits, he hurts, he is dangerous. Conservative interests know that while Liberals are most adept at breaking their own necks with their tongues, Radicals are most adept at breaking the necks of Conservatives.

"Radicals precipitate the social crisis by action - by using power. Liberals may then timidly follow along or else, as in most cases, be swept forward along the course set by Radicals, but all because of forces unloosed by Radical action. They are forced to positive action only in spite of their desires ...

  • "The American Radical will fight privilege and power whether it be inherited or acquired by any small group, whether it be political or financial or organized creed.
  • "He curses a caste system which he recognizes despite all patriotic denials.
  • "He will fight conservatives whether they are business or labor leaders.
  • "He will fight any concentration of power hostile to a broad, popular democracy, whether he finds it in financial circles or in politics.
  • "The Radical recognizes that constant dissension and conflict is and has been the fire under the boiler of democracy. He firmly believes in that brave saying of a brave people, "Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
  • "The Radical may resort to the sword but when he does he is not filled with hatred against those individuals whom he attacks. He hates these individuals not as persons but as symbols representing ideas or interests which he believes to be inimical to the welfare of the people.
  • "That is the reason why Radicals, although frequently embarking upon revolutions, have rarely resorted to personal terrorism."

Alinsky practiced what he preached. He said, "Tactics means doing what you can with what you have ... tactics is the art of how to take and how to give."

He uses eyes, ears and nose for examples...

Eyes
"If you have a vast organization, parade it before the enemy, openly show your power."

Ears
"If your organization is small, do what Gideon did: conceal the members in the dark but raise a clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more that it does."

Nose
"If your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place."

Alinsky devised and proved thirteen tactical rules for use against opponents vastly superior in power and wealth.

1. "Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
2. "Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. "Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.
4. "Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon.
6. "A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. "Keep the pressure on.
9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
10. "Major premise for tactics is development of operations that will maintain constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.
12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
13. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

"The real action is in the enemy's reaction. The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength. Tactics, like life, require that you move with the action."

Alinsky was hated and defamed by powerful enemies, proof that his tactics worked. His simple formula for success...

"Agitate + Aggravate + Educate + Organize"