The Death Squads within the Abortion Lobby have existed on lies, long enough. They call it "family planning."

Can you believe it?  Planned parenting now includes not only the deaths of unwanted family members,  but the selective deaths of unwanted family members.  

<<<<<   This picture is the heart and soul of this post.  NBC is the worst of the "Big Three,"  by far and away,  but there is a marked complicity with cBS (note the small "c") and ABC.  

"Keep Abortion Legal" is the issue I want to highlight in this post.  

A week and a half ago,  a "gotcha" video was aired in the "alternative media," exposing Planned Parenthood's willingness to help in a "gender based" abortion,  the "client" wanting to abort if her unborn if  "that" was a girl.  While those at Planned Parenthood pretend "gender bases abortions  are abhorrent to them,  we all know this is precisely where the abortion lobby is getting ready to go next.  How do I know?  

Because we anti-abortionists have not been wrong in any of our predictions.  

1. Back in the late 1970's, we were told that abortions were intended for consenting adults --  only;   under-aged girls were not in view.  In fact,  when pro-lifers charged abortionist death squads with moving to include minors,  they were ridiculed and laughed at.  Turns out they - the pro-lifers -  were right all along.  

2.  When the world of the 70's was told that legal abortions would be used,  in a primary sense,  to protect the health of the mother,  Lifers screamed "liar, liar."   They were accused of being conspiratorial and,  even, "out of control."   Turns out that, in 2010,  more than 1.2 million infants were aborted for no other reason than the recreational needs of the "mothers".  

In other words,  1.2 million unborn were destroyed "just for the hell of it."   

3.  When those who cherish life accused the abortion lobby of working to disengage minor girls from parental control,  again,  they were ridiculed and made fun of.   Turns out, once again,   they were right,  all along. 

4.  When the protectors of life criticize Planned Parenthood for using federal funds to practice abortions,  the people are told that the "business" of Planned Parenthood involving abortion constitutes only "3%" of its business.  They forget to tell folks that this "3%" equals 400,000 abortions per year.  Turns out,  critics were right all along. 

5.  When Lifers charged the death lobby with moving to include abortions after week #21,  the abortion of "late term" but "viable"  unborn, we were called "liars" and "wingnuts" and misguided."  Turns out that Lifers were right all along.  

6.  When those charged with protecting the innocent unborn accused the abortion lobby of supporting the murder of those infants surviving an abortion attempt,  they were framed as disgustingly insensitive to the truth and the health of the mother.  Obama voted for this practice as Illinois Senator.  In the end,  it turns out  that this practice is fully approved by those who favor abortion.  We were right all along.  

Gender based genocide is the next step for these immoral bigots  -  and "we" will be found to have been right "all along,"  as well.   

The "gotcha" video????   c  --  BS gave the video 18 seconds of time, last week.  ABC and NBC completely ignored the story.   The omission could not be defended, except for the blatant bias of those two news agencies.  Of course,  in time,  "we" will be proven to be right,  in our suspicions.  We have yet to be wrong about these people and their "cause."    

Is it an "unibike" or a motorcycle?

The Sexy Electric Bike
August 17, 2008

Two clever Canadian teen-scientists have built a bizarre, eco-friendly electric bike which runs on principals similar to those of the Segway — but looks way cooler.
   The motorcycle is propelled by leaning forward; the further you do so, the faster you go. Similarly, the driver simply leans back to slow down and leans left or right to steer those directions.

The only control is an on/off switch. Top speed is around 60 kph, although it’s only optimized for about 25 kph. Enough to get around town, at least.
Read the rest of this entry »

Romney takes 33 seconds to describe "Day One" of his administration.

Facebook was overhyped according to users on . . . . . . . . . . . . Facebook.

Our blog,  Midknight Review,  fits in with the 13% taking a negative view on Facebook.

It is a our layman opinion that Facebook's IPO  ($38 per share) was 40% overvalued.  If Facebook can partner with companies that understand marketing and can figure out how to maximize its popularity in terms of its commercial value,  then the company's  stock will merit investor interest.

Why will gays always be an extreme minority in our country? Genetics.

<<<<<<<<<<<  Why so few gays?  Answer:  its called "genetics."  If I answered with "God,"  all you libertarians would start with your threats.  But with "genetics,"  there is no one to hate, is there?   Lucky for the human race, things are the way they are in genetics.  

Garance Franke-Ruta / The Atlantic Online:
Americans Have No Idea How Few Gay People There Are  —  Surveys show a shockingly high fraction think a quarter of the country is gay or lesbian, when the reality is that it's probably less than 2 percent.  —  One in ten. It's the name of the group that puts on the Reel Affirmations gay …

Editor’s notes:  indeed, we are wired [genetically] to be heterosexual,  as if the biological design of “male” and “female” was not enough evidence.  The fact that nearly all children raised in  “gay” homes grow up to be heterosexual is another reason why  I am not worried about the gays “taking over.”  God in nature or,  if you prefer,  “Mother Nature”  has the species locked into a heterosexual lifestyle. 

Those who prefer to pretend to be the opposite sex,  transvestite and transsexual,  are less than a quarter percent of the US population.  That being said,  all need to be given the freedom to live their lives without fear of reprisal.  I believe that, but I do not believe that marriage is anything other than a relationship between a man and a woman. 

If  “marriage” is extended beyond this definition,  the hate crime lobby,  given enough time,   will make reference to traditional marriage a criminal offence under hate crime/hate speech laws,  and off to jail you will go. 

That is already the case in Canada,  Spain and France.  Understand that none of those countries have a First Amendment, however.  So, the radical gay movement just might not win its battle to criminalize heterosexual speech in our country,  but,  it will succeed in teaching the lifestyle in our schools.  Again,  with teaching and all,  the ability of the gay jihadists is limited by our genetic code.  

Friday, Bill Clinton trashed Obama's campaign against Mitt Romney. Mitt has "a good business career."

We give you Romney's next campaign ad:  

"A man who's been governor and had a sterling business career crosses the qualification threshold."  Bill Clinton, June 1, CNN interview with Piers Morgan.  Read the story here. 

I am not the only one who sees racism in this Administration. The Wall Street Journal has the same vision(?).

<<<<<     Wall Street Journal:

Holder's Racial Incitement  —  When looking for the Attorney General's motives, think lower.  —  The United States of America has a black President whose chief law enforcement officer, Attorney General Eric Holder, is also black.  They have a lot of political power.  So how are they using it? . . . . . .

Editor's Notes:  

Ever wondered how racism could be expressed by  black leadership on an intellectual plain far removed from that of Al Sharpton and Maxine Waters? 

From this article we have this excerpt.  You will want to read the full text.

". . . . . . . The two most powerful men in America are black, two of the last three Secretaries of State were black, numerous corporate CEOs and other executives are black, and minorities of many races now win state-wide elections in states that belonged to the Confederacy, but the AG implies that Jim Crow is on the cusp of a comeback.

It's demeaning to have to dignify this argument with facts, but here goes. . . ."

It took Obama just four days to claim credit for the newest cyber attack.

 David E. Sanger / New York Times:

Obama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran  —  WASHINGTON — From his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered increasingly sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran's main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America's …

J Smithson/ On May the 28^th ,  I wrote this prediction: 

It is clear to this blogger that folks within the Bush very secret service, helped to develop a virus that is 20 times more potent than the famous Stuxnet virus that shut down much of Iran's nuclear project a couple of years ago.  It just might prove to be Obama's savior.  Time will tell.  Meanwhile,  let's see how long it takes for Obama to  (a) take credit for the virus and (b) to expose those who helped in its development, you know,  like he did with the Yemenite double agent,  Seal Team Six and the Pakistani doctor who helped locate Osama bin Laden.  

My question is this:  how does Obama claim credit for a virus "invented" during the Bush years?  

Today,  we have the above headline, a shameless attempt at grabbing another headline.  Apparently Barack does not know that the enemy reads the papers and listens to American news, nor does he value "secrecy" in the multifaceted war on terror.  Buffoon.  

Yesterday, a class act stood face to the face with Barack Obama, a reminder that the White House is not owned by the Marxist hordes.

<<<<<  A classless introduction is met with humor and grace on the part of Bush.  Obama insults Bush  with these words: 

"We knew our economy was in trouble, our fellow Americans were in pain, but we wouldn't know until later just how breathtaking the financial crisis had been."  


Maybe Obama’s insult will help to add context to all of Bush’s comments.  One wonders how much of Bush’s comments were spontaneous and which were prepared.

With G.W.'s awesome performance of yesterday in mind,  I thought this AOL headline was significant:  President Bush Steals The Show at White House,   a headline that takes you to a story in the Huffington Post that says nothing of the kind.

When you review Bush and his acceptance of the White House portraits of he and his First Lady,  you will see a confidence and congenial attitude that is far from the snobbery  of Barack and Michelle.

I thought it very significant that George, introducing his wife,  proclaimed her to be the "best"  First Lady, ever,  as he turned to his own mother and said,  "Sorry, Mom."  And,  with a smile,  he moved on with his remarks,  completely ignoring Michelle Obama, the current "First Lady."

When you learn that Bush's eight and a half minute speech was solely written by G.W. (he no longer employs speech writers), you realize just how significant a statement his "first lady" statement was.   No "current" presidential couple  has ever treated a past president with the degree of disregard as have the Obama's.  Setting their blatant racism aside,  their disrespect for the "transcendence of the office of the president"  is near legend and,  if not "legend,"  certainly "infamous." 

Indeed,  President Bush stole the show. 

Maybe you have seen this before,  but,  this time, listen through 

the ears of the Obama's.  At one point,  George laughs as if saying

"he he he."  See if you find that moment. 

Another month of bad news - this time we have the worst report in half a year.

<<<<<< The DoL is reporting a rise in unemployment from 8.1% to 8.2% and a rise in "under-employment" from 14.5% to 14.8%. Jobs creation has fallen each month since January,  from 275,000 jobs in January to 77,000 in April and 69,000 in May.  

The White House is saying,   "Don't put too much faith in the monthly reports  - we continue to deal with a recession that began in 2007," while Nancy Pelosi tells anyone who is still listening to her, that "it is time for the Republicans to listen to the American people."  The financial geniuses with the Marxist Media are blaming more than 600,000 Americans who decided to start looking for work, again, in the month of May,  driving up the unemployment number.

Obama's Childish Declaration

What is missing in all this is a single negative review directed at the Obama Administration and its miserable failure with jobs creation.  "They" want you to forget about the Administration's gleeful 2010 announcement of "the Summer of Recovery"  and Obama's declaration,  "We have broken the back of the recession." What was "childish" about these announcements was the fact that Obama/Biden clearly thought the mere proclamation of "good times" would play a role in advancing the recovery.  

 Who is to blame?  We - the American People - are the ones at fault

In the end,  the blame for all of this is found in the fact that the American people fell in love with a man (B Obama) who was grossly unqualified to run this county,  a man with no diplomatic experience,   no background in finance whatsoever, a man whose Utopian world view is nothing other than an extension of the childish game we used to call "playing make-believe.   

Jobs Creation is a five month downward trend

Here are some very discouraging facts:  job creation was at a two year high, in January with 275,000 jobs "created."  In February,  that number fell to 259,000, March came in at 143,000 (adjust down from 154,000),  April recorded 77,000 jobs created (after an original and false report of 115,000),  and,  now,  May records a disturbing low of 69,000 jobs created by our economy.

GDP numbers revised down, again

In addition,  the original report of 2.2% for First Quarter growth with our Gross Domestic Product,  was revised downward to 1.9%.  Obama's GDP (or are they calling it "Bush's GDP")  has average less than 2 percent for 2010, 2011 and, now, 2012.

LaborForce participation rate lowest in history

Since the "Summer of Recovery" (2010),  four million Americans have quit the workforce,  driving that total to 88 million folks now longer participating in the American workforce.  The participation rate,  the percentage of the total available workforce, is down to 63.3% ,  the lowest in history,  even lower than during the Great Recession.    

Update 

Consumer Confidence is a new low

When times are good,  "consumer confidence" runs near 90%.  Today,  that number is near 64%,  indicating a shocking lack of confidence (by the American people) .  If this particular number, remains at historic lows,  Obama's re-election hopes are gone.  Understand that I am saying  --  as a long time observer -- that this "confidence" measurement is a direct reflection on confidence in the [any] Administration.  This number is a more consistent predictor of election outcomes than [even] the unemployment percentages.  

Another bad indicator - T-Bills

Treasury Bills are selling at historic lows.  For example,  10 year T-Bills are offering 1.47% interest on your investment, as of this morning  (June 1).  The big question is this:  why would anyone put their money in T-Bills if,  10 years from now,  your investment gain is $14.70  on a $1000 investment?  Sounds crazy,  but,  if you are afraid of losing your money in this economy,  you put some of your money in these accounts. . . . . . . another indicator of lack of confidence in the supposed "recovery."  

All this negative information is a harsh reminder of the foolishness found in the term "jobless recovery."  


Update #2

Obama's Stimulus cost the nation 4.1 million jobs.

James Pethokoukis / The Enterprise Blog:

CBO: Obama stimulus may have cost as much as $4.1 million a job  —  The Congressional Budget Office in a new report: … OK, so without the stimulus, there would be anywhere from 200,000 to 1.5 million fewer people employed right now?  That means the current cost-per-job created is somewhere between $4.1 million and $540,000. . . . .