Showing posts with label progressive ideologue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label progressive ideologue. Show all posts

Why the "recovery" is Obama's worst nightmare.

31 share
strong interest

<<< Progressive-ism  is NOT an economic theory,  only a methodology for the redistribution of wealth without regard for a sustainable national economy.  

As reported in USA Today:  “It’s not going to stop me from doing what I think needs to be done in order to help families all across this country," ~ Obama, July 31,2014. 

And, so,  the empty threat of “transformation by dictate” continues.  And exactly how have our lives been changed for the better,  by this stupidity? 

Fewer Americans are participating in the national workforce than before 1978.  Bush averaged less than a 5% unemployment rate throughout his two terms,  including 2008,  with a much larger workforce  (6 to 7 million more Americans than at the present time.) 

The economy ran a 2.9% decline for the 1Q and a 4% increase for the 2Q before the next two revisions.   If past revisions are a model,  the next two revisions will bring this increase down . . .   perhaps to a 2.5% increase,  which would put the economy chugging along at recessionary rates.  Over the past 12 months,  the economy has averaged 2.4% growth,  month over month,  in terms of our Gross Domestic production rates (GDP).  This is the slowest recovery in modern-day history,  and Obama wants to brag about what he has done in terms of economic recovery?!!!

Our transportation fuel price-at-the-pump remains at record highs,  the most Americans have spent on fuel over any five year period  . . . . .  the most ever. 

And this thoughtless,  anti-Middle Class buffoon, is doing the same thing to residential heating fuels, all along the North East coast.  Before he is out of office,  millions of Americans,  many of them Democrat voters,  will know exactly how bad he has been for the country and their pocket books,  and the Socialist Earth Savers will have nowhere to hide. 

Projections for ObamaCare’s first term sign-ups was to have been 18 million enrollees.  The Administration came up with a “shockingly high,” eight million,  but insurance companies can only confirm 5.5 million,  and 87% of these people receive subsidies for the favor of enrollment.  And the GAO has condemned ObamaCare as a massive failure due to mismanagement.  (GAO = Government Accounting Office).  

Obama claims 8 to 9 million “jobs created” as if he had anything to do with that made up stat,  but fails  -  in the same breath – to remind the listeners that more people have left the work force during that same period of time.  Net number of people put back to work?  Close to Zero. 

The private economy is producing jobs,  but at a rate slightly higher that the monthly increase in new workers.  Because of economic improvement,  such as it is,  the inflation rate,  which this Administration has been lying about for years,  is about to go through the roof.  Heard that before?  Of course you have,  but,  understand that the federal interest rate on our money,  has been a record lows since Obama.  With the increase of jobs,  again, meager as that might be,  comes the realization that interest rates will increase.  Why?  Not the point of this post.  Just know that an increasing jobs market will bring higher rates for money lent to buyers and investors,  private and corporate.  And with that,  a slow down of the economy,  or,  at least,  that is the fear.  
Understand that only bright light in this “recovery,”  has been Wall Street.  Since 2009,  the Street has profited from a thing called Quantitative Easing.  Now that this period of free credit/”money” is coming to an end,  the economy is about to take another huge hit. 


Doom and gloom?  Who really knows,  but things are about to change.   I do not believe the Dems are going to escape the coming results of a prolonged,  sick economy.  Time will tell,  but know this:  Progressive-ism  is NOT an economic theory,  only a methodology for the redistribution of wealth without regard for a sustainable national economy.  

Here is proof of the split developing within the Democrat Party. Its civil war time, especially if the "ruling class" decides that Hillary is fatally flawed as a candidate.

22 share (moderate reader interest)
On several occasions,  I have stated my opinion as to Hillary's candidacy,  specifically,  that she is neither charismatic nor blessed with critical political instinct.  Her book tour has been a disaster,  and her decision to appear as though she is part of the poorer class of the population,  has already backfired on her  . . .  she just does not know it  - a perfect example of her poor instinctive abilities.  As you read from the Daily Mail,  perhaps you will feel the same sense of departure as I did.  

Understand that the Socialist Progressives have a foot hold in the Democrat Party,  if which they have no intentions of letting go.  Hillary is not one of "them"  . . . . . .    Elizabeth Warren is,  and she (Warren) is more a true Utopian Progressive than Obama or Hillary ever thought of being.  While Warren is not mentioned in the article,  below,  you should know that her presence is implicit to the mounting criticism of Hillary.  Understand this,  there really is no alternative for the true Progressive other than Warren.  At many levels,  Obama has proven to be a serious disappointment to the far and ideological Left.  He is much too self-serving and "messianic" in his agenda . . . Warren much more the ideologue and Hillary is a poor candidate.     Expect to see this divide explode,  over the coming months.  Warren is passionate,  well spoken,  accustomed to the polemics of Progressive debate/defense,  and available.  Don't agree?  No problem.  Just keep this moment in mind,  as Campaign 2016 advances.  
Daily Mail
Hillary Clinton’s fellow Democrats smell blood in the water after her recent gaffes over her considerable wealth and they began pouncing on the presidential hopeful on Monday.
Dick Harpootlian, a former Democratic Party chairman in South Carolina, framed his insult in terms the fictional aristocratic Crawley family and their servants could understand.
‘I don’t know whether it’s just that she’s been “Madam Secretary” for so long, but she’s generating an imperial image,’ Harpootlian told The Washington Post.
‘She’s been living 30, going on 40 years with somebody bringing your coffee to you every morning. Is it more Downton Abbey than it is America?’
Harpootlian, like more than half of the Democratic establishment, backed President Barack Obama in his epic battle with Hillary for the 2008 presidential nomination.
He’s also an ally of Vice President Joe Biden, who took his cue Monday morning and asked the audience at the White House’s ‘Working Families Summit’ to cut him some slack because his personal wealth falls short of the Clintons’.
‘Don’t hold it against me that I don’t own a single stock or bond,’ Biden said. ‘Don’t hold it – I have no savings accounts. But I got a great pension and I get a good salary.’
He declared himself ‘the poorest man in Congress.’ As vice president, Biden officially presides over the U.S. Senate and can cast tie-breaking votes.
Biden’s financial disclosures suggest a net worth of around $800,000, enough to put him in America’s often derided ’1 per cent.’
But Bill and Hillary Clinton’s balance sheet has been estimated at between $50 and $100 million.

A brief history of the Uptopian/World Without Borders Movement within the Democrat Party. Turns out, Obama may be the worst thing to hit this historic big government movement, in our history.

Updated (3/9) for added content and (a few) corrections.  
Birth of the Modern Utopian Congressional Era
The Democrats took over both houses of congress beginning with January 20, 2007  . . .  both houses.  Bush's approval numbers were at record lows;  the American people were tired of the four year Iraqi war,  and the Progressive/One World Media had been successful in turning public opinion against our 43rd president.  Nancy Pelosi was the minority leader in the House.  After the elections in November of 2006, and the Democrat victories in the Senate and House  she was voted majority leader and became the first female House Speaker, in American history.    

At the same time.  (D) Harry Reid,  became the new majority leader in the Senate,  and began a reign of dominance in that congressional body that has had no equal in American history.  


Democrat complicity in the 2008 financial collapse
Obama was a rising star and freshman Senator,  at the time.  With the 2006 midterm elections,  the Democrats took control of the banking and finance oversight committees in both the Senate and the House  . . .  BOTH houses. 

As a side note but a part of this history,  we need to understand that the financial collapse of 2008,  occurred during the oversight years of the Democrat Party.  The two Democrat banking chairs,  Christopher Dodd in the Senate and Barnie Frank in the House,  each telling the nation there was no need for concern, that our financial future was secure,   as they rejected Bush's efforts to reel in the out-of-control Affordable Housing Program.  

As national concerns were increasing,  Bush's efforts to move the nation away from the financial brink were demonized by congressional Democrats, the President being condemned  as "heartless" and a "hater of the poor."   In fact,  Frank reassured the nation,  just 6 weeks before the bottom fell out,  that the financial world was, "fundamentally,'  in good shape.    

Again,  the financial collapse,  4th quarter of 2008,  took place under the supervision of a Democrat congress which refused to admit to the danger signs being talked about by Bush and his advisers.  


Strategy for winning the 2008 elections
With the 2008 financial collapse,  the Democrats realized that their time for serious gains,  in congress,  was knocking at the door.  In spite of the fact that the Dems held congressional control of the banking committee for two years,  prior to the collapse,  they were able to shift the blame onto Bush,  and the 2008 elections became the single most profoundly one-sided, national election cycle of all time.  


2009 Stimulus' Unstated Purpose
Look what the know-nothing Utopians did with the economy after they got the reins.  Their first order of business was the 2009 "stimulus,"  a billion dollar  "emergency jobs bill,"  written by the Dems before Obama took office;  none of which went to a substantive,  systemic,  solution to our problems.  In fact,  3/4 of all that money went to either interest on that debt or Democrat constituencies,  whether unions or Democrat controlled congressional districts.  That "stimulus" was sold to the American people as a jobs bill,  so vital to the US economy that we did not have time for congressional debate or even a reading of the bill. That explanation was a lie, a malicious and intended lie,  crafted to deceive,  to cover over the real reason for the bill's extravagance,  and that reason,  in a word,  was "payback."    Embedded in this bill was more than a million dollars,  a set aside,  for the coming healthcare reformation.  Besides this set-aside,  the "stimulus" was nothing more than payback for Obama's supporters,  period.   Proof of this claim,  is the fact that the bill failed in its announced goals,  and failed miserably.     

Months and years after this "emergency" bill was passed into law on February 17, 2009  (only 29 days after Obama took office),  we have nothing to show for it.  The unemployment rate increased from 7.8% to 10% by October of 2009,  with no spending increases representing repairs, to infrastructure because of the stimulus supplied funding.  In fact,  to this day,  there is no verifiable accounting for the monies collected and spent.  On top of this and years after the fact,  11 million Americans have given up on working and have quit the workforce  -  a 36 year record low.  


What could have been but was not
We should never,  ever,  forget that the 2008 Progressive/Utopian Democrats had grabbed power away from the traditional Democrat majority,  represented by Hillary Clinton.  As a result of McCain's compromised and  nonsensical 2008 campaign,  the childish claims of an inexperienced Barack Hussein Obama,  won the day,  and the Utopians OWNED congress for the next two years.  

They could have made whatever fixes they wanted to the economy.  The world was theirs.  They had placed the first borderless,  Utopian/Progressive socialist,  into the presidency,  and held super majorities that could not be resisted,  by the opposition.   

These Utopians could have passed  comprehensive immigration, given 12 million illegal aliens full and complete amnesty;  passed cap and trade (an idiotic scheme,  in the name of "climate change" devised to redistribute wealth),  forced the Fairness Doctrine through congress  (an assault on free conservative speech),  accomplished  full nuclear disarmament,  finalized regressive gun/ownership control,  made changes  to  international relations and treatises that could, then,  be used to supersede our Constitution as the sovereign law of our nation, moved to end individual property rights,  destroyed what was left of states rights and the implications of a robust 14th Amendment; they could have given the unions their "card check" strategies (another scheme,  this time for the purpose of union control of industry without a secret ballot),  and quantified a thorough-going regulatory takeover of the private sector business community;  the Republicans could not have stopped a single piece of legislation. 


Perhaps the victory is ALREADY ours
Look at all that did not "get done."  A remarkable list of feckless dreams and failed legislative effort.  

When one stops to think about,  the conservative Right,  soundly defeated the Progressive agenda and its fundamental transformation of the United States. Again, return and review the list of "what could have been,  but was not."   We do not give ourselves enough credit  -  and it is the "radical Right" that is largely responsible for this victory.  Whatever Obama does with executive orders and via regulation,  is temporary.  There is no permanency to his solutions,  as things stand now.  If the Right keeps the House and nothing more,  in the coming elections,   Obama's one world ambitions for this once great nation,  will be over.   


Scott Brown's victory and its true implications
(The beginning of the end for Utopian Progressivism)
In spite of their rather comprehensive agenda, they got nothing done during this two year period,   and had to pass ObamaCare without the necessary changes they had planned,  because of the shocking election result in December of 2009,  giving Republican,  Scott Brown,  Ted Kennedy's seat after that Senator passed away.  The Senate seat held by Kennedy,  was in Democrat hands for 53 years.  With Brown's victory,  the Democrats' one party rule came to an abrupt and unforeseen end;  their Super Majority Rule was gone and they have been in decline,  since that victory.  

Of course,  the Dems held a 59 vote majority after the Brown victory.  They still held enormous congressional power,  but the Scott Brown election was more than a surprise,  it was a statement by the American people,  that they did not like what they saw,  they did not approve of what had happened since the November election in 2008.  Brown took office in January of 2010.  In November of 2010,  the teaparty influence guided the nation to vote against the 2008 victors,  in one of the most one sided elections, against the Democrats,  in American history.  As it turns out,  the Scott Brown victory,  was a wakeup call to the Progressive Imperialists running the nation,  a call for caution they refused.  

Two years wasted; one of the most profound political failures in American history. . . . . a chance to change the world for the Progressive Socialist Movement -------  gone.    


The other team could not play and they still lost the game !!
As it turned out,  the Obamacrats in congress,  were so inept,  they could not get "it" done in spite of the fact that they had no opposition.  Watching this was like watching two teams playing football;  one team sits on the sidelines and the other plays every minute,  only to lose the game,  in the end. What happened,  or,  more correctly,  what did not happen,  could be the baseline for a comedy routine on Saturday Night Live.  But it happened,  or "did not happen,"  and we conservatives need to be encouraged by the magnitude of this political defeat.  


The 2014 Elections, a repeat of 2010  ??  
Today,  March 8, 2014, the Democrat Party is fractured between its Utopian Wing,  and the more traditional big government types. This political party is being judged for its singular legislative "accomplishment,"  and the coming election is proving to be more of a defeat,  than its 2010 "cousin."  Of course,  political winds change,  and certain defeat can to avoided,  but,  as things stand at this writing,  great fear for the coming elections,  is everywhere within the Democrat Party.  

Such is a brief overview of Modern Day,  Progressive History,  lead by the know nothing,  Barack Obama;  a perfect monument to the Devolving Progressive Movement,  in this country.  
_________________
Related comment and articles: 

A cut and paste from a liberal site, here,   http://www.ask.com/question/failures-of-progressive-movement :  

Failures of Progressive Movement?

Answer

The main failure of the progressive movements was committing atrocities against the black Americans. This movement did not address the black American's problem despite the fact that it brought reforms to the government. They had no common goals to solve the societal problems.

Rush claims that Obama's overriding agenda is the defeat of his enemies. Interesting thought. Rather than reject Limbaugh, out of hand, think about what he says as you observe Obama's antics over the next four years.

<<<  Here is Obama arguing for revenge.  No other president in history has used such language,  and the Democrat Party is gourging itself on this kind of rhetoric.  

RUSH: Let me tell you what I think, and I'm gonna tell you this in a balanced way -- a balanced and fair way. What I think is really going on here is our president, Barack Obama, if you'll note, really never talks about plans and proposals to solve problems. What he does is position his political opponents as the enemy. Everything he did today in the debt limit Q&A in his press conference, and even in the setup, was about the enemy. The Republicans are the enemy.

He's not proposing solutions to anything. He's not interested in solutions. As far as Obama's concerned, there isn't a problem, other than the existence of opposition to him. I mean this from the bottom of my heart. The biggest problem to Obama is the existence of opposition. And I'm telling you: I firmly believe everything going on in Washington today -- everything inside the Beltway, in the media, in the think tanks, in the halls of Congress, everything -- is oriented toward eliminating a viable opposition.

Mark Levin calls Obama an "Imperialist President."   I have used the same language on this blog.  But,  my theme is a little different,  now.  I consider Obama our first Revenge President.  He is not a "Progressive ideologue."  Rather he is an angry black man who holds the founders of this nation in total contempt and views the Constitution as a white man's document,  traditional Christianity as a white man's faith,  redistribution and political power as the best revenge.  He is all about "pay back."

You have 22 seconds to listen to this 8th grade level polemic, no?  

Sadly,  this is no longer theory.  Obama has divided this nation into "angry takers"  and the hard working blue collar class.  And he won an election using this divisive strategy.  For the next four years,  we will have to endure a steady stream of hate mongery from the Left.

My chief concern,  at the moment,  is the "fear" I have of loosing the House to the Left,  in 2014.  If that happens,  I expect to see a move to dispense with term limits for the presidency, and one party rule as we could have never imagined.  That is what I think might be our future. 

_________________
End notes: 

Understand that I listen to Rush no more than three hours per month. I have grown tired of some of his antics.  At the same time,  there is no other living individual who has done more for the consrvative cause than Rush.  He gave us a voice when we had none.  He convinced us that we have power as conservatives,  that we can win when we refuse to compromise on the principles that make us conservative and this country great.