Obama's Iranian deal, if agreed to, will allow Iran to develop an intercontinental missile delivery system . . . . seriously.

From Joshua Pundit: 

Breaking: Obama Hid North Korean Rocket Component Transfers to Iran

US intelligence officials have now revealed that during the Iran nuclear negotiations, North Korea has sent several shipments of advanced missile components to the Iranian regime in violation of UN sanctions - and that the Obama Administration hid the violations from the UN.
Since September more than two shipments of missile parts have been monitored by U.S. intelligence agencies as they transited from North Korea to Iran, said officials familiar with intelligence reports who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Details of the arms shipments were included in President Obama’s daily intelligence briefings and officials suggested information about the transfers was kept secret from the United Nations, which is in charge of monitoring sanctions violations.

Critics of the U.S.-led nuclear framework agreement reached in Switzerland earlier this month have said one major deficiency of the accord is its failure to address Iran’s missile program, considered a key nuclear delivery system for the Islamist regime. 

CIA spokesman Ryan Trapani declined to comment on the missile component shipments, citing a policy of not discussing classified information  . . . . . .  No wonder the Iranians insisted that their ballistic missiles program was off the table in any negotiations. Why the president agreed to it is another matter entirely, especially since he had to have known the sanctions he kept boasting about were being grossly violated.
U.N. sanctions imposed in 2009 on North Korea’s nuclear and missile tests prohibit the export of missiles and related technology, and obviously the president didn't want to make an issue of that either, even if it meant deceiving the UN and the P5+1.  (you will want to read the full article,  linked above).

Prediction: there will be no Iranian/US agreement, today. Just another failed deadline (there have two previous deadlines) ala Obama's "red line" in Syria.

And when the "agreement" is reached,  it will not be in writing;  Kerry will insist that it is not a binding treaty (he has already made that rather stupid admission).  More than this,   Kerry has been instructed by Obama to allow Iran to store it's nuclear material in underground bunkers,  preventing their destruction by either Israel or the other Arab nations in the region (none of them support this "peace" effort).  And, in June,  if not another failed deadline,  this Administration will boast about the "peace accord" with the same feckless ineptness that went into its brag about Yemen and Somalia and the "death of al Qaeda" and the J.V. status of ISIS and the declaration that Iraq was "strong,  stable and sovereign." 

Iran is in violation of the treaty before the treaty is a treaty !! But we can trust them, now ??!

VIENNA (Reuters) – Iran is failing to address suspicions it may have worked on designing an atomic bomb, according to the latest report by a U.N. watchdog, potentially complicating efforts by world powers to reach a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program.
The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency said Tehran had still not provided information it was due to produce more than two months ago to help advance a long-running IAEA inquiry into suspected nuclear weapons research.

The confidential document was issued to IAEA member states less than three weeks before the Nov. 24 deadline by which Iran and six global powers are seeking to end a decade-old standoff over the Islamic Republic’s atomic activities.    “Iran has not provided any explanations that enable the agency to clarify the outstanding practical measures,” it said.

Two things wrong, here: Kerry/Obama are NOT working for a binding agreement with Iran (their words); and, this, then, is their excuse from not taking it to Congress. If its not binding, why does Congress need to review and approve? What a joke.

Question:  How can Obama claim that he is solving a problem while negotiating a 10 year moratorium against weaponizing Iran,  while,  at the same time,  working for a deal that "is not binding?"  There is simply no logical path from these two points,  published by the Administration,  to Kerry's statement,  "Because of this deal,  Iran will not get a nuclear bomb,  period." 

 

Obama stalls for more time but we know the truth of his Iranian intentions.

Some say this news story is Obama preparing the American populace for, yet,  another classic/disgusting failure on hgis part.  Most say that this news item foretells Obama’s decision to allow,  even facilitate,  a nuclear Iran.  If that is the case,  and it was apparent after his second year in office,  that he was working for that end,  he has single handedly,  done more to destroy the balance of power in both a regional sense as well as a world wide sense.  To imagine that no one is talking about impeachment,  much less imprisonment,  is the most disgusting aspect of his presidential term. 

WASHINGTON — In a much-anticipated speech delineating his foreign policy for the remainder of his term in office, US President Barack Obama said Wednesday that his administration’s refocus toward international cooperation provided a new opportunity to resolve tensions over Iran’s nuclear program. While warning that the odds of success are “still long” in getting Iran to give up its nuclear weapons development, he said that “for the first time in a decade, we have a very real chance of achieving a breakthrough agreement.

“Despite frequent warnings from the United States, Israel, and others, the Iranian nuclear program steadily advanced for years,” Obama recalled, explaining why his new policy emphasized cooperation rather than unilateral American action. “But at the beginning of my presidency, we built a coalition that imposed sanctions on the Iranian economy, while extending the hand of diplomacy to the Iranian government.”

Obama said that the US-led international coalition has afforded “an opportunity to resolve our differences peacefully” with Iran.

Obama's betrayal of Israel is becoming far too obvious . . . . and, he has secretly been making deals with Iran for months.

Headline Explanation:  The conclusion that Obama has been secretly working to soften restrictions against Iran,  that he has been doing so for months,  is not a blog conclusion or a Right Wing assertion.  Rather,  this comes the Left Wing's The Daily Beast.  See the story here.   

Understand that while Hussein Obama has been playing president,  the Iranian nuclear fuel supply has grown from 5,000 centrifuges in early 2009 to 16,000, today.  You should know that  "20,00" is a unit estimate many believe to be necessary before Iran can develop a nuclear bomb  . . . . . .   and,  Obama has sat around on his proverbial and watched this happen.;  I believe he has done so on purpose and not because he is simply "inept."    

He is a typical but smooth talking street black who hates the Establishment White Community,  its system of governance (the Constitution   the Amendments and that sort of thing) and the Jews.  There is nothing that makes my point more clearly,  than this news story.  Israel is on its own and with the US as its "friend,"  it does not need anymore enemies.  

"I met Secretary Kerry right before he leaves to Geneva," said Netanyhau. "I reminded him that he said that no deal is better than a bad deal. That the deal that is being discussed in Geneva right now is a bad deal. It’s a very bad deal. Iran is not required to take apart even one centrifuge. But the international community is relieving sanctions on Iran for the first time after many years. Iran gets everything that it wanted at this stage and it pays nothing. And this is when Iran is under severe pressure. I urge Secretary Kerry not to rush to sign, to wait, to reconsider, to get a good deal. But this is a bad deal--a very, very bad deal. It’s the deal of a century for Iran; it’s a very dangerous and bad deal for peace and the international community." 

\

Middle East Peace - an impossible dream now that Iran has nuclear capabilities.

Abbas, Clinton and Nitanyahu are major players in this weeks push by Obama, to bring peace in the Palestinian/Israeli long running crisis.

We give this a zero chance of creating a long term change in the debate and associated conflict. Read on and you will understand why.

What is not being discussed by the media is the timing for this conference. While the participants have been involved in continuing talks over the past several weeks, if not months, the announcement for the event came at the same time the Iranian nuclear plant was being heated up with the assistance of Russian antagonists.

Understand that the Obama opposition - or supposed opposition - to the intentions of Iran "going nuclear" has been a colossal and abject failure. We will look back in time and mark this as one of the most critical circumstances in the history of the Middle East. It changes the balance of power in the region and gives Iran a position of power that complicates plans for peace and political stability throughout the entire region. Most analysts believer that an attack on the nuclear plant in question would have passed without major complications if it had taken place a few months ago. Now, with the plant producing nuclear material, the Iranian rush to regional dominance is well on its way -- and we have Mr. Obama's wreakless idealism to thank for this.

We find great significance in the fact that on the same weekend Iran goes nuclear, Obama began his 10 vacation in the Hamptons and Hillary announced the peace talks for this week. Ask yourself, which of these three events is the more important? Anyone see the connection?

Point of post: think for a moment as to the critical importance of Iranian nuclear advances; tie this foreign policy disaster to the ensuing politics of the region; understand that all this came to a "head" two weeks ago and you will understand the purpose for the Administration's timing announcing "peace talks begin" at the very moment in history when peace in the Middle East became an impossible dream.

Obama and Company desperately wanted their Iranian failure "out of the media's eye." It looks that there strategies have succeeded. The story is nowhere to be found -- jds.
.