Take It From Me, the Attacks on Vindman Are Disgraceful
I was born abroad and served. So did my three younger brothers. If Vindman is suspicious, are we?
Former US Army Colonel
Editor: Nothing disgraceful about defending the President. From reports , Vndman charged that a quid pro quo demand had been made but deleted from the written record. Understand that the military aid in question was withheld but for only 20 days, and was withheld before the infamous phone call . . . again, before the call was made. 20 days later, said military aid was given to Ukraine but without the hint of an investigation. So, in terms of actual facts on display, the falsity of a quid pro quo claim is without debate. In addition, the President and the Foreign Minister of the Uraine both deny any quid pro quo deman. In other words, Vindman was not giving an honest or true picture of the phone call between Trump and the Ukraine President . . . . . . . . . period.
No comments:
Post a Comment