TPM overstates the talking point against the Nunes Memo, opening the door to public scrutiny . . . . well deserved public scrutiny.

Allegra Kirkland / Talking Points Memo: FBI Publicly Savages Nunes Memo For ‘Material Omissions Of Fact’

Editor:  "Publicly Savages" is far too harsh for what actually happened in this article.  The TPM article asserts a partial reading of the text,  by the FBI,  when,  in fact,  the memo is only four pages and takes no more than 10 minutes to read.  Partial reading??  What,  the FBI only read the first page or maybe page three?  

More than this,  the FBI does not assert errant facts in the publication.  Rather,  it is "concerned" about the context of the memo's description as to how the agency gathered information in the Trump/Russian fiasco. 

The FBI stonewalled the House Committee for more than a year,  and now,  must pay the price.  Enough of the nation's citizenry is aware of the FBI's malfeasance regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation to hold the agency with any regard at all.  I mean,  Hillary took a hammer to some of her cell phones,  and bleached all of those 33,000 "missing" emails, and the FBI saw no criminal intent in those acts  ???!!!!!  No,  the agency is not deserving of trust and may be about to receive its just due.  

 

4 comments:

  1. The memo is so embarrassing that even Trump’s own legal advisors have told him not to release it. Trump’s own hand-picked FBI Ditector Christopher Wray is threatening to make a public statement refuting the memo if Trump releases it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its embarrassing alright . . . . . . for the Dems and FBI. Why do you think they don't want it made public? If it was embarrassing to Trump, they would have been the first to release the information.

      If the investigation into Trump was based on the Dossier, bought and paid for by Hillary and the Russians, the investigation is bogus and should be ended immediately. Wray is an Agency man, so, of course, he wants to protect the agency.

      Delete
  2. It will put Nunes in jail for conspiracy to obstruct.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have 300 bucks that says you are a moron . . . no jail time for Nunes, not even close.

      Delete