By the way, there is nothing scientic about "the polls."

When polling gives an opponent a favorable position,  the Globalist Media (for example) runs that poll until the next poll is released.  In such cases,  polls are used as propaganda  in addition to raising money for the "winning" side. 

The Left believes that "consensus" establishes "fact," thus poll after poll after poll.  Consensus ("97% of all scientists") is used to established the "fact" that man can stop global warming.  Of course,  there is zero evidence for this,  but the Globalists use "consensus" to establish this "fact,"  and raise/redistribute money using this bit of faux logic.  Never mind that all scientists believed the earth was flat,  at one time,  or that Pluto was a planet, or that eating more than two eggs a week would kill you, or that men can become women, or that Hillary would be our next president.  

But more than the notion that man can accurately predict the future,  we have the polling nonsense that polls often include "an error co-efficient of plus or minu3 or,   plus or minus 4.2."   Nobody knows what that "fact" means outside of the effort to quantify the accuracy of the poll.  Think about that for just a minute.  "They" want you to believe that "accuracy" can be measured.   The poll in question,  is to be  "97% accurate,"  that is what "plus or minus 3 points" means.  I maintain that a poll is not "accurate" if there is a 3% chance that it is wrong.   Look,  there is a difference between being "accurate" and "being accurate most of the time."  Put a single bullet in a revolver,  point at your head,  and pull the trigger.  "Most of the time,"  no problem. 

And,  the notion of "plus or minus" is bogus to begin with.  The number is wholly arbitrary and useless for that reason.  It is a made-up number.  

Finally,  in political polls (at least), the criteria used for the survey can be used to manipulate the outcome.  For example,  most Globalist polling results will weight the survey in favor of a particular side.  Most often,  we find that Globalist or partisan polling will ask more Democrats for their opinion versus Republicans or Independents.  Gallup often asks 23% more Democrats for their political opinion versus Republicans.  Such a poll only works if 23% more Democrats vote than Republicans.  But never mind that bit of logic,  these clowns use such polls to tell us what the nation believes, and,  in that pretense,  they suppress the voter turnout of the losing side.  I mean,  who will go to the polls if their side is "losing" by 21 points, as was the case in the Clinton/Bob Dole election (per NBC news),  the eve of election day.  Dole actually lost by 7 points.  

Understand that these "scientific polls,"  in the final analysis,  are never right.  While an outcome may have been predicted,  the margin of victory is almost never correct.       

'Nuff said (as I reach for another cup of coffee,  laughing at that last thought).