6 quit but 15 remained. Know why? Buzzfeed sure as hell didn't bother to tell you.




From the very partisan Democrat blog, Buzzfeed,  we have this bit of propaganda:  

Six members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) have resigned, furious at what they say is the new administration's regressive health policies and a lack of care shown by President Trump.
Scott Schoettes, Lucy Bradley-Springer, Gina Brown, Ulysses Burley III, Michelle Ogle, and Grissel Granados announced their resignations publicly in a joint letter for Newsweek magazine.
"As advocates for people living with HIV, we have dedicated our lives to combating this disease and no longer feel we can do so effectively within the confines of an advisory body to a president who simply does not care," they wrote.

Notes:  So,  where are the interviews of the 15 members  who decided to remain?  Why did they so choose [to remain]?  Obviously,  the 15 disagreed with the 6 partisans who left.  Why?  Did this  program have a strategy in place,  before Trump [the answer is "Yes,  of course"] ?  Did the President take down this strategy?  If not,  why is Buzzfeed reporting that there is no strategy in place to deal with the continuing problem of HIV?  Did anyone interview Administration members about this issue?  Maybe those who quite were on the verge of being fired.  If so,  why were they being considered for termination? 

Not much of a story,  if you don't know all of the facts.  Get my point?  
  


No comments:

Post a Comment