Trump shows signs of cutting funding for the U.N.

Colum Lynch / Foreign Policy:
White House Seeks to Cut Billions in Funding for United Nations  —  U.S. retreat from U.N. could mark a “breakdown of the international humanitarian system as we know it.”  —  State Department staffers have been instructed to seek cuts in excess of 50 percent in U.S. funding for U.N. programs …
Notes:  The United Nations, for the Democrat Party,  is an institution that allows for certain global membership and the beginnings of a global governance centered in a nation-state (i.e. Belgium) that is not Washington. D.C.    In fact,  Hillary/Obama/Schumer/Pelosi believe that U.N. treaty supersedes our Constitution. With that in mind,  it was Hillary's idea to ban gun ownership in the U.S. via United Nation small arms treaty (2006).  The effort failed or faded away,  I am not sure which,  and,  in the end,  the window of opportunity for the suppression of our guns failed.  
You should know that the Left denies the above Midknight Review charge.  An article at Snoops,  gives the reader this conclusion: 
 In short, there is no “legal way around the 2nd Amendment” other than a further amendment to the Constitution that repeals or alters it, or a Supreme Court decision that radically reinterprets how the  2nd Amendment is to be applied. 
Clearly,  this is a denial that ignores the fact that the Globalist Left does have a path around Congress and legislative approval.  Obama walked this path for six year.  If and when they return to Congressional power,  all they have to do is ignore Constitutional law and its 2nd amendment.  
I mean,  there is no legal path for "Sanctuary Cities,"   none.  They are illegal   . . . .   all 240 of them.  Yet,  there they are.  They exist because the radical/subversive Left does not care about  (i.e. "does not believe in) the authority of the U.S. Constitution. 
Now you know that "legal" to a Democrat is defeated by "ignore and process."   
As a result,  the U.N.  needs to be marginalized if not abandoned.  Its ultimate global goals should have nothing to do with American politics.   They are diametrically opposed to everything our Founders envisioned.  Never forget,  we "nationalists" have been here from the very beginning.  George Washington was our first president.