Hundreds of millions of taxpayer money has been spent on fraudulent "scienctific climate reseach." Its been going on since 1994.

Nearly two decades and $108 million worth of “disturbing” data manipulation with “serious and far ranging” effects forced a federal lab to close, a congressman revealed Thursday.
The inorganic section of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Energy Geochemistry Laboratory in Lakewood, Colo. manipulated data on a variety of topics – including many related to the environment – from 1996 to 2014. The manipulation was caught in 2008, but continued another six years.

Editor: BTW,  this first paragraph is highly misleading.  It implies the 108 million dollars were spent since 1996,  when,  in fact,  it was spent since 2008.  

“It’s astounding that we spend $108 million on manipulated research and then the far-reaching effects that that would have,” Rep. Bruce Westerman said at a House Natural Resources subcommittee hearing. “We know how research multiples and affects different parts of our society and our economy and … if you’re working off of flawed data it definitely could be in a bad way.”

 Westerman cited a recent Department of the Interior Inspector General (IG) report that said impacts from the data manipulation “are not yet known but, nevertheless, they will be serious and far ranging. The affected projects represented about $108 million in taxpayer funding from fiscal year 2008 through 2014.”

2 comments:

  1. Smithson is lying again. This data fraud was in relation to water quality, not climate science.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Department of the interior deals with assessing the State of Water and Power in the West as it relates to the threat of global warming. The issues are not inseparable, and you know it. So stop with your word games.

      The One World, European Progressive crisis machine majors in scare tactics and the subjugation of personal rights for the sake of whatever crisis it decides to push for the day. It can't succeed without institutional lies and the fabrication of "evidence," but, mostly, it feeds off the daily headlines it can create. Example: every freaking year, "they" talk about the low levels of ice at the North Pole, never telling anyone that this is an annual issue. Its called "summer" and before the end of the year, the ice is back. Its all bullshit.

      Delete