Didn't watch Obama on Fox, today. Here is why:

For starters,  it is a demonstrable fact that he tells the "truth" only when it suit his cause.  Because I can't tell the difference between his truth and his lie,  I have no reason to put stock into anything he says.   

He has been irrelevant since the day he signed Dodd/Frank into law,  back in July of 2010  . . . .   six stinking years ago.  And Hillary is running on the theme of fixing Dodd/Frank,  the bill that prevented "too big to fail."  No,  he did not fix that problem so she has to finish the job.  

Obama fixed "equal pay for equal work" with the Lily Ledbetter bill,   early in 2009.  The fact that Hillary is campaigning on that very theme is proof that he fixed nothing in 2009   . . . . .   another indication of his irrelevancy.   

Nope.  I intend to do what he has done to the American blue collar male for eight years,  I am going to ignore him.  He has done NOTHING to benefit my life or yours,  in the here and now,  which makes his life as president,  inconsequential.  

Now you know.


4 comments:

  1. Hide your head, ignore history. You don't want to be exposed to an intelligent, popular, wise and compassionate commander in chief. The best president in your lifetime. If you disagree, you're on the wrong side of history, which is your usual place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did he unite the country? Absolutely not and he divided the once great nation with malicious intent. In other words, he did it on purpose, laughing at anything conservative, thumbing his nose at Constitutional process, losing the peace in Iraq, the war against ISIS and the Afghan War. A man who foolishly believes we have no enemies, who wages war with rules of engagement that make it impossible to win any semblance of "victory," a man who hates the function of "Commander" and deserts his duties as a military leader in favor of fairness to the enemy. Look, anyone who finds Al Sharpton challenging and appropriate is an intellectual moron by right of conduct.

      Delete
    2. No, the GOP has changed. Look at the candidates.
      The level of obstruction and a radical lack of cooperation has made the GOP into a party not even recognizable by Ronald Reagan. Today, Reagan would be cast aside as a 'liberal'. The GOP has marginalized itself by it's own radicalism, hate and bigotry, and will be tossed in the trash after the next election. Wrong side of history. Live long, I hope you get to see it.

      Delete
    3. Democrats wrote the book on obstructionism. The Harry Reid Senate was the slowest Senate in American history, literally, after 2010. And the congressional Dems opposed virtually everything GW Bush proposed after they collectively approved of military action in Iraq.

      You are right, however, as to the Radical Right's influence in the GOP, but wrong when ignoring the reason for their rise. GOP party leadership ignored . . . . totally ignored . . . . . the Conservative Right for the past six years in the House, and the radicals moved in, this year. Such is the potential problem with democracy.

      Dems have a similar problem, but not as critical, with the Bernie Sanders constituency. The Dems have loaded up the Hillary candidacy with Superdelegates and intends to squelch any opposition to Hillary. Lockstep versus Democracy.

      Delete