The smoking gun: Whether or not a document was noted as classified was never the question . . . . and Hillary knows this . . . . . and we can prove it, leaglly speaking.

Editor's notes:  Turns out she knew that a document did not have to be marked as "classified" to be classified.  We know this because she signed a declaration to that effect.  The Washington Free Beacon reported on this,  three months ago. 


BY:

As the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that “negligent handling” of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.
A day after assuming office as secretary of state, Clinton signed a Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement that laid out criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.
Experts have guessed that Clinton signed such an agreement, but a copy of her specific contract, obtained by the Competitive Enterprise Institute through an open records request and shared with the Washington Free Beacon, reveals for the first time the exact language of the NDA.
“I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation,” the agreement states.

2 comments:

  1. Give up the witch hunt, ankle biters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tell it to the State Department and the 150 IRS agents working on this case, one of which leaked this document. You can't comprehend that this email problem is a criminal investigation ? Seriously . . . . and you have that PhD. ?????? good grief.

      Delete