Biggest loser (other than CNN's credibility) was Bernie Sanders, who capitulated to Hillary as he took time to fiercely defend Hillary with his demand to "stop talking about those damned emails" (or words to that effect). Obviously openness and honesty mean nothing to a flaming socialist. His time in the sun is just about over . . . . mark my words.
Update: Oh, btw, average age on the stage was 65 years of age and everyone is white. Guess the only qualified black guy within the Democrat Progressive Party is done with no "honorable mentions."
Prediction: Only three Democrat debates to go. And, the ratings for the next debate will be worse than this first debate. Understand that the Marxist Dems are not united, they are required to walk the party line or pay the price in the near future.
As far as I am concerned, there is no need for any of the next three debates. The men on the stage just gave Hillary the nomination and there can be no reversal of that reality when "back bone" within the party does not exist.
Laughable.
Would you rather see a democratic socialist America, or do you want to keep licking the boot of the top 1/10th of 1% ?
ReplyDeleteWhere in the world do you think Sanders or Hillary get the money to spend on their bloated welfare budgets? Hint: from licking the boots of the 1 percenters.
DeleteSee, people like your self, never learned the lesson of wealth accumulation. You actually think wealth is a fixed amount, that the more the one percenters have, the less that is AVAILABLE to the rest of us. Nonsense.
You don't know what your talking about. Sanders doesn't even have a PAC, he takes no large Corp donations.
DeleteNancy Reagan is voting for Hillary, as would her husband if he were alive.
http://nationalreport.net/nancy-reagan-want-hillary-win/
Who said anything about a PAC? And I do not care who Nancy votes for. She was and is a mystic. Your are back on the happy weed if you think Ron Reagan would vote for Hillary. Crazy wrong.
Delete