“For 222 months, since December 1996, there has been no global warming at all,” writes climate expert Lord Christopher Monckton, the third viscount Monckton of Brenchley
“This month’s [satellite] temperature – still unaffected by a slowly strengthening el NiƱo, which will eventually cause temporary warming – passes another six-month milestone, and establishes a new record length for the Pause: 18 years 6 months,” Monckton adds.
Monckton’s data comes as NOAA scientists release updated data purporting to show there’s actually been no hiatus in global warming. NOAA scientists made adjustments to temperature records to show more than twice as much warming as the old analysis at the global scale from 1998 to 2012.
“Newly corrected and updated global surface temperature data from NOAA’s [National Centers for Environmental Information] do not support the notion of a global warming ‘hiatus,’” wrote NOAA scientists in a new study.
The difference between Monckton’s data and NOAA’s data is that satellites measure the lowest few miles of the atmosphere, temperature measurements from government scientists rely on thousands of weather stations, buoys and ships across the world’s surface.
Both satellites and surface temperature readings, however, showed prolonged periods without statistically significant warming trends — 15 years for surface temperatures and more than 18 years for satellites.
HAHAHAHA ... what a joke... "climate expert" Lord Christopher Monckton, the third viscount Monckton of Brenchley -- his educational background: an MA in classics, 1974; diploma in journalism studies.
ReplyDelete(Smithson is very impressed with the "third viscount" title - that qualifies him as a 'climate expert'!)
He has TWICE been asked by Republicans to testify about climate change before committees of the U.S. Congress. Lord Monckton is a living symbol of the fact that climate change deniers will believe anything that seems to support their case, even if it’s coming from the most ridiculous source.
The stupid is very strong here.
You have your mathematical weather "models," and have 20 years of satellite data. I am going with the data.
Delete