Proof of Obama's continued Benghazi cover-up (see the video)

 

Problem:  Darrell Issa,  chairman of the House committee in change of investigating the Benghazi cover-up,  has sent two letters  (April 16 and April 26) complaining about threats against those who wish to testify and requesting a pathway to classified information that is needed by those who would testify.  It is not reasonable to assume that Obama is telling the truth,  at this point.  Of course he “is aware.”  For crying out loud,  he knew he was going to call on Ed Henry,  first,  in this morning’s presser and he knew that Fox News had broken this story yesterday,  Monday the 29th. 

2 comments:

  1. CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien asked the Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) if he had "voted to cut the funding for embassy security."

    "Absolutely," Chaffetz said. "Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010.

    http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/10/rep-chaffetz-says-he-absolutely-cut-funding-for-embassy-security/


    The GOP is responsible for Benghazi. House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton WARNED that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

    And they try to pin it on Obama. What a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ellen, Deputy Assistant Secretary Charlene R. Lamb was asked during Senate hearings (Oct 12, 2012) if under funding contributed to the Benghazi murders. Her answer was an unqualified "no." Her testimony is a matter of video record and can be found here: http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/live-video-house-committee-hearing-investigating-attack-in-benghazi/

    your lies to the contrary.

    ReplyDelete