Remember these two Ignorants, posing as tough guys
instead of mere racist punks? Well, they did not show for
their scheduled trial and were convicted of charges related to this scene on November 4 of 2008, and were found guilty because of their absence.
*******
Turns out that Holder, the newly appointed head of "Justice," vacated this prosecution in following
a policy of refusing to prosecute Blacks, in general, on charges of voter
fraud. In our second video, below, Holder, in testimony before the House, challenged comparisons of voter suppression in the South in the 1960's (and before) with the actions of the two Black Panthers in Philadelphia, and, in so doing, demonstrated a certain dismissiveness with regard to the Black Panther incident. It is as if he was saying (under his breath),
"You think this was bad, it was nothing as to what my people went through for decades, in the South . . . this is get even time as to voter suppression, folks!!"
"You think this was bad, it was nothing as to what my people went through for decades, in the South . . . this is get even time as to voter suppression, folks!!"
An assistant prosecutor in the DOJ, under Eric Holder, Christian Adams, interviewed with Megyn Kelly (an 8 minute segment) as to the
extent of the prosecutorial misconduct within the DOJ. Adams resigned in protest. In the interview, he argued that the voting booth is "sacred" and leveled this shocking charge:
" . . . there is a hostility in the . . . .civil rights division [of the DOJ] to bringing cases on behalf of white victims for the benefit of national racial minorities . . . . that is a fact. . ."
Today, after all the talk, all the cover-up, all the black bias driven garbage coming from our Department of Justice, a Federal DC Judge ruled that Obama's Department of Justice did, in fact, interfere with
the prosecution of two New Black Panther party members after they were filmed
outside a Philadelphia polling place in 2008 intimidating voters. This is something the Justice Department has denied up to
this point.
More from the Washington
Examiner:
The ruling came as part of a motion by the conservative
legal watch dog group Judicial Watch, who had sued the DOJ in federal court to
enforce a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to
the the New Black Panthers case. Judicial Watch had secured many previously
unavailable documents through their suit against DOJ and were now suing for
attorneys’ fees.
From the judge: The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
From the judge: The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
No comments:
Post a Comment