Democrat Racism documented: "Re-segregation" is not possible with a Republican President despite accusations otherwise from the Party of Segregation.

Talking point #352: segregation was and is the primary party politic of the Democrat Party


 The headline of the moment:  

GEORGIA HOUSE MINORITY LEADER ACCUSES REPUBLICANS OF RE-SEGREGATION

I would think this headline to be funny if it were not for the fact that so many will believe its underlying premise,  that being "the Republican Party is the party of segregation."  

Think about it:  Democrats gave us the KKK  It was Southern Democrats who murdered black ministers, hung black fathers in front of their family, burned black churches to the ground,  refused blacks the vote,  made slaves out them as a matter of national policy.  George Wallace,  the Democrat governor of Alabama,  was a stereo-typical Southern Democrat governor of the 50's and 60's,  segregating public schools and refusing black entry into state colleges.  The military was segregated under Woodrow Wilson and,  again,  under FDR  -  both Democrats.    When President Eisenhower tried to pass the first civil rights act in the mid-1950's,  it was opposed by the Democrat Party lead by none other than LBJ.  In 1964,  this same LBJ helped to pass the Civil Rights Act that we have today.  The bill passed with a higher percentage of Republican votes than Democrats.  

When the headline speaks of "re-segregation,"  it has to be talking about days of old when Democrats ruled the South,  and blacks were running for their lives.  

It is not only a ridiculous accusation (implied),  it is a filthy lie with absolutely no historical basis in fact,  whatsoever. The Republican Party and its largest demographic, TEA party conservatives,  have never been about segregation as a matter of policy . . . . .   never.  

Certainly,  we have had folks bring signs to our [TEA party] meetings and demonstrations,  but,  in every case,  those incidences were dealt with, the signs were taken down,  and in some cases,  the offending individuals were removed.  "Re-segregation" as a goal of the GOP is not possible.  Heck,  the Republican Party had its very beginnings fighting and dying for the end of slavery.  The Democrats can make no such claim.  

In today's social economy,  black Democrat leadership  (and I speak of Democrat "leadership" only) is all about the blame game and taking from the larger community.  These leaders,  Al Sharpton and Maxine Waters as examples,  are among the most raciest leaders in this nation.  Every social problem within the black community is considered "the fault of both the white man and [especially] the conservative Republican white man."  The truth is a very different reality.  

When a younger man,  I believed we were headed for a time when race would not be the issue it was at the time of my high school graduation (1963).  I raised two sons as a single parent.  One of my strategies as a parent,  was to brainwash them (better me than the secular media) against the evils of racial prejudice.  Mississippi Burning was a film released in 1988 (my boys were 13 and 10 at that time). that documented the killing of three college aged voting rights workers in 1964 (I was 19 years old).  They caught the killers,  but only convicted them on "civil rights violations."  You can imagine,  me a young person,  seeing "three of my own generation" murdered and buried in a land fill,  and their killers getting away with murder.  I never forgot that time.  

Although I never made the point to my boys,  those who killed the three young men were all Democrats. I did not make the point because it did not seem important.  But,  since that dark time,  somehow,  along the way, this all got turned on its head,  and the Republican's have been labeled "the party of segregation"  when nothing could be further from the truth.  

Taking on the task of correcting "race" lies from the Left,  Bob Parks,  a conservative black journalist and reporter has written as thorough an expose' on this matter,  as can be found on the 'net.  

The article,  titled The Democrat Race Lie **  documents more than 60 legislative and historical events, putting Democrat complicity in its deserved context.  

Here are a few excerpts from this article:  


Beginning with this first entry:  


October 13, 1858
During Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) states: “I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my brother, or any kin to me whatever”; Douglas became Democratic Party’s 1860 presidential nominee . . . . . 


Bob Parks goes on to document 62 additional events,  such as:  


August 18, 1920
Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures


 March 12, 1956
Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation

May 6, 1960
President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour, around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

August 20, 1996
Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law

You have the above link. Take time to read the full article.  

Point of post:  while racism can be found in our churches,  all political parties,  in Occupy and the TEA party,  the fact remains that the Democrat Party bears most of the blame for this continuing tragedy.  Certainly,  even if you disagree with that last statement,  the fact remains that Democrats, long ago,  forfeited their right to complain about and point the bony finger against Republicans.  No act of prejudice is more insidious than the current push to enlist blacks onto the welfare rolls and keep them there.  Should they be excluded from such aid?  Of course not,  but neither should their presence on these welfare rolls be a generational camping ground.  There is no upward movement when welfare supplies all needs except that of job training and job placement.  The worst kind of prejudice is that which enslaves people in exchange for their political support.  


**  I like the fact that Parks uses "Democrat" rather than "Democratic."    Understand that "Democrat" is often considered an insult,  members of that party preferring "Democratic Party."  I never use that last term because "democratic" speaks to process in my opinion,  and,  as such,  does not frame the Democrat  Party as I see its function  --  it is not a democratic institution.