The national debate on CBS - First impression? It is a truly great discussion

Post script: I will pronounce a winner: Newt Gingrich. He had a substantial grasp of the issues and he put the media, especially Scott Pelley, in his place.

Live notes:

It just past half-time in the debate and Newt just hit a home run. When asked if he would critique Mitt Romney, Newt simply said "No." His point being, "We are here to talk about what we would do different from Barack Obama. " Finally, someone telling the media about cows and cabbage, instead of the other way around.

It is clear to me, that Herman Cain stands against very informed competition as to foreign relation matters. I would give Cain a B- at this point -- informed but not overly so. This is a debate about being the "Commander in Chief."

Understand that a "B-" is the worst grade on the stage tonight. Think about it. If you were in a class of students and the worst grade in the class was a "B," you would know that you were part of a class of outstanding young people. That is what we are seeing in tonight's debate.

The moderators for the first hour, were Scott Pelley of cBS News and Major Garrett of the National Review. Pelley is much more the radical liberal of the two men. From time to time you could hear him mumbling under his breath. He attempted to control the audience in attendance. The crowd ignored him.

Only the first hour of this debate was aired on network television. Here in California, the second hour was off line. I was not able to figure out how to hook for the second hour. I want this readership to know that I intend to follow up on this assignment. I would think the entire debate will be re-played on C-Span. If so, I intend to work up a detailed report.

One thing for certain, this kind of public discussion is not going on within the Democrat party. All the debates have huge live audiences. This debate, at least the first hour, was the best of the many for shared ideas and depth of knowledge.

More on this later . . . . tonight, I hope.

Update: I couldn't find the post network feed. Turns out that CBS failed in their feed broadcast, per the following article (click on "Read more")

The Big Loser of the Night: CBS November 12, 2011 9:35 P.M. By Marc A. Thiessen National Review If there was a loser on the debate stage tonight, it was CBS. First, they scheduled their debate on a Saturday night between two major football games. Then they decide to only broadcast the first hour of their 90-minute debate. Then their Internet feed failed for the final 30 minutes. This was CBS’s first and only debate — and it showed. Scott Pelley was a terrible moderator. He treated the men who might be the next commander in chief like schoolchildren, cutting them off in mid-sentence, lecturing them to answer his questions. He even lectured Newt Gingrich on policy, telling him that killing “terrorist suspects” is “not the rule of law.” Big mistake. Newt smacked him down, explaining that we are at war and in war we are allowed to kill the enemy without a court order. This was CBS’s first and only debate — and it showed. Of the candidates, Rick Perry had his best debate by far. His construct of starting at zero on foreign aid with every country (including Israel) and then deciding from there what is in our national interests got good applause, and both Newt and Romney openly embraced it. He had several self-effacing jokes about that agency he forgot about at the last debate (Energy) which got big (friendly) laughs from the crowd. Despite Pelley’s blatant efforts to trip him up, he did not trip. Who would have imagined that Perry’s best debate would be on foreign policy? Newt had a very good night as well. In addition to smacking down Pelley on killing terrorists, he refused to take the bait in Pelley’s effort to start a fight between him and Romney. He was clear and articulate and will only enhance his growing following with his performance. Romney put in another strong night. His best moment was when he was asked if he would negotiate with the Taliban: “We don’t negotiate with terrorists, I won’t negotiate with the Taliban.” Bachmann got off several good lines, declaring that Obama stands with Occupy Wall Street but not with Israel, and that when it comes to terrorist interrogation, Obama is letting the ACLU run the CIA. Cain seemed to struggle and was out of his element. Seemed like every answer seemed was: I will gather the facts and consult with my commanders/cabinet. His best moment was when he was asked about waterboarding and declared clearly: “I do not agree with torture. Waterboarding not torture. It’s an enhanced interrogation technique.” (Romney was not asked, but his campaign tweeted his agreement with Cain). It was a good discussion, undermined by Pelley’s poor moderating and CBS’s failure to broadcast effectively. Fortunately, there will be another discussion of foreign policy and national security soon: the AEI/Heritage/CNN debate on November 22. It will be in prime time on a Tuesday — on a network that knows what it is doing.