Obama once believed in a national civilian security force. Will the next 13 months manifest this radical plan?

Just four months before winning the 2008 election, Senator Hussein Obama had this to say:

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Would one of you libs please tell me (a) what in the world this means and (b) why I should not be worried about the statement? Understand that absolutely no previous president has ever said anything of this nature.

Note: you can find the speech in which these words are spoken here. Understand that when the text of the speech came out on July the 16, the above quote was deleted. These people are not to be trusted. They will lie about anything, at the drop of a hat, and, then, pretend that you are a moron for accusing them of playing games with the truth. One last point. Where in the blogosphere, can you find this kind of reporting? Tell a friend.

In the video below, we have Obama, along with Hillary, at a Black Panther rally. He announced his run for the presidency in February of 2007. This event is sometime after that announcement, 2007. You have to look for him, but the video shows Obama actually marching with these black terrorists thugs. My question is this: as you look at the video, could this event have anything to do with whatever radical idea Obama was entertaining in the above quote?
m

m

Understand that Hillary and Obama are the first presidential candidates to ever march with the punks we call the "Black Panthers." Never doubt the radical tendencies of Hillary. If you know of Saul Alinsky (Rules for Radicals), this might surprise you, but, Hillary worked under Alinsky as an intern. She wrote a B.A. thesis about the life of Saul Alinsky (he was very much alive, back then). Obama only knew about the man. He never met Alinsky. But he read Alinsky's book and taught the thing while at Columbia. The book, Rules for Radicals, was the battle plan for Obama as a community organizer and is the way he is running his campaign.

Point of post: at all levels, Obama trained himself and participated in the process of confrontation politics. His campaign strategy comes right out of Rules for Radicals. His private sector business was that of a radical reformer using strong-arm tactics to force banks and community leaders to do his bidding. That was his expressed job as a community organizer. As president, we have story after story of an Obama, behind closed doors, issuing threats in order to get his way. He has not taken a single opportunity to correct anyone "on his side" for issues that include threats of physical violence. he demagogues at every opportunity. After three yeas as the leader of this country, it is clear that thuggery and partisan "fight" rhetoric are his weapons of choice.

This post drives that point home. Understand that this blog is not about GOP versus Democrats. Rather is all about the evils of progressive politics (also known as secular socialism) and, especially, Barack Obama.

One final point. Obama has no ability for the profound. He does not have a single original idea in his head.

He is only a radical student with the ability to put what he has learned into words.

The blessing in this fact, is this: we can predict his strategy because it comes from the thinking of others, especially, from Saul Alinsky. I recommend that you go out and buy this book, Rules for Radicals. After 30 plus years, it is still in print. Take note of chapter two. Alinsky makes the case for lying in order to advance the greater good. That is what we are up against. A group of radicalized socialist who will say and do anything to win.