Out of Wisconsin, here is an interesting headline: Collective bargaining law published despite restraining order . It should stand with Wisconsin Legislator's Leave Town In Violation of Wisconsin Law, or Teachers Attend Illegal Strike in Madison.
Or how about this: "The measure sparked protests at the Capitol and lawsuits by opponents because it would eliminate the ability of most public workers to bargain over anything but wages, " and its more accurate rewrite: " The measure sparked protests at the Capitol and lawsuits by opponents because it would eliminate the ability of most public workers to bargain over anything but wages -- similar to the agreement between Federal workers who have no bargaining rights as to benefits, either. "
Point of post: to demonstrate the blatant hypocrisy of the Left when it comes to the Law and their illegal activities. Understand that the posting of the Wisconsin law is . . . . . the law; it has to be posted within 10 days of passage.
The unions involved in the Wisconsin controversy believe it best to require the unwilling workforce to be forced to "join" their unions or sit at home doing nothing; they believe it is reasonable to steal taxpayer money in the name of "union dues" and spend it on causes many taxpayers do not support; they believe it is reasonable to live off the taxpayers of Wisconsin, taking the taxpayer's money and using those funds to buy votes that force the taxpayer to pay more and more into the union coffers.
After adjusting for out of state emails, those for and against the Wisconsin law number 44% for the law and 33% against. In an election, this would be called a landslide victory for Scott Walker and the GOP. The unions are on the wrong side of this issue and don't know it.
No comments:
Post a Comment