First meeing of world leaders with the Trump Administration about recent administrative changes to the Paris Climate Accord.

Here is a headline intended to deceive:  After reading it,  you might conclude this secret meeting,  held on Trumps homeland,  is an emergency meeting to trash our President.

Global elites expected to discuss President Trump during secret Bilderberg meeting in VA 

Sounds little foreboding,  no?  The meeting is in progress as we speak  (June 1-4) which means it was scheduled before the Trump announcement to get out of the Paris Climate Accord. 

The Trump administration will have very strong representation with the likes of National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, and the president's strategist Chris Liddell.

Other U.S. politicians listed as participants include Republican Senators Tom Cotton and Lindsey Graham, and former diplomat Henry Kissinger who recently met with Trump.

Understand that this meeting is "secret" only because the Biased/Marxist Media is not invited.   It will be a time to discuss differences of opinion between strong US and the rest of the needy ("we need US dollars") world.  You should know that Trump has the meaningful if not tacit support  . . . . .   heavy hitters all.  

Apparently the DNC doesn't like the view from under the bus. DNC Break with Hillary goes public . . . . big time.

Questions about the Paris Climate Accord

Does this mean we will no longer lead the world in CO2 reductions?  Of course not.  In fact,  we lead the world before the agreement. 

Does this mean that China and India will start polluting now that the big, bad, United
States is out of the agreement?   As members,  they never agreed to stop polluting,  not in the coming decade,  anyway. 

Will the earth begin,  again,  to over heat?  The agreement never impacted the environment.  The greatest heat reduction hoped for,  under this accord,  was a reduction of 1.5 Celsius,  one hundred years from now  . . . . .   seriously.  In other words,  Paris offered no meaningful projected impact,  contrary to the crap you will hear in the coming days. 

So,  why the agreement if  membership and set-goals are voluntary,  China and India continue to pollute on a record pace,  and there is no environmental impact as defined by the written statement of the accord,  itself?  Why?  Wealth transfer.  In the next decade,  India,  for example,  is to receive 1.,5 trillion (with a T) dollars as a member nation before it implements any plan to cut its emissions.  

ObamaCare was an insurance plan,  not a healthcare revision.  The 2009 trillion dollar America Investment and Recovery Act  (the "Stimulus") only spent 18% of its funds on "recover,"  the rest went to union dues and paybacks to Democrat congressional districts,  Dodd/Frank grew big banking and screwed the small banking industry,  Obama's coal policy screwed the middle class worker in the coal states with no replacement jobs in sight.  Obama's military reductions gave us the weakest and smallest military in 75 years,  and, now,  the Paris Accord,  a non-binding agreement that circumvented the will of the people and congress,  will allow for the theft of trillions of dollars of American wealth  (as much as 200 trillion over the coming 100 years).  Its ALL a wealth transfer scam.

Madyson's mid-week update.

 26 share
322 clicks

Going to miss this place. Good bye Big Sur

Update:  She found a place,  is moving to LA mid-month, will sit-out a year of school to develop her modeling career. 


A little tired moving to L.A.

• 6,055 followers

Madyson Rose

Model // Bikini Addict // Collegiate Runner Twitter + 👻: @madysonhouseman DM for bookings and collabs 📍California

Two members of the Tinfoil Crew now try to make Jeff Sessions a secret agent.

As you read,  just know that this is old news.  The meetings referenced are of absolutely no consequence.  The excerpt speaks of two meetings Sessions had with the Russians.  The article doesn't tell you that one of those meetings was a passing "Hello,  how are you," and the other, a  dinner or some such meeting,  where the Russian ambassador and Sessions both attended along with several others.  There was no secret meeting of any kind.  In fact,  their meeting is not worth the mention.  This is all about the Democrats trying to over-turn the election they charge the Russians of corrupting.  Peas in a pod,  as far as I am concerned.

AOL:  Two Democratic senators reportedly sent repeated requests to the FBI—including to then-Director James Comey—about the possibility that Attorney General Jeff Sessions may have had another undisclosed meeting with the Russian officials, reports CNN.
The USA Today notes, "On Thursday, Sens. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Al Franken of Minnesota released three written requests they made earlier this year for an FBI review of Sessions."
The controversy began during Sessions' Senate confirmation hearing when he denied having any contact with Russia in the months leading up to the election; however, it was later revealed that he had spoken with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak twice—in July and September of 2016, notes the Washington Post.
In light of the discrepancies, the Democratic lawmakers, both members of the Judiciary Committee, wrote to Comey on March 20, saying, "We are concerned about Attorney General Sessions' lack of candor to the committee and his failure thus far to accept responsibility for testimony that could be construed as perjury."

Trump postpones his decision to move our embassy to Jerusalem.

Here is the official WH statement:

While President Donald J. Trump signed the waiver under the Jerusalem Embassy Act and delayed moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, no one should consider this step to be in any way a retreat from the President's strong support for Israel and for the United States-Israel alliance.  President Trump made this decision to maximize the chances of successfully negotiating a deal between Israel and the Palestinians, fulfilling his solemn obligation to defend America's national security interests.  But, as he has repeatedly stated his intention to move the embassy, the question is not if that move happens, but only when.

Shocker headline: Susan Rice and Samantha Power may be facing federal indictment

Shocker headline:  Susan Rice and Samantha Power may be facing federal indictment.  We do not know for certain,  but we do know the House committee has broadened its investigation to include the criminal use of "unmasking" and the abuse of the FISA court.  There is a mountain of actual evidence dating back to 2013 and before,  having to do with the Obama Administration's abuse of its federal powers.  140 AP reporters fell victim to this abuse,  as did James Rosen of Fox News, the presidents of France,  Spain, Germany,  Argentina and Brazil  and members of the Senate to include Dennis Kucinich.

After reading the following headline, wouldn't it be funny if . . . .

Byron Tau / Wall Street Journal: House Intelligence Panel Issues Seven Subpoenas in Russia Probe  —  Four are related to Russia investigation, three to ‘unmasking’ controversy, individuals say.

Editor.  So,  yesterday,  we find out that the House has expanded its investigation to include Obama's abuse of power and his misuse of the FISA court.  I can see a little humor in the evolving fact that "they" find nothing impeachably wrong with Trump,  but stumble onto another Obama scandal?  

Fake News story #209: This has to do with lawyers "begging" Trump to Stop.

New York Times:
Less Tweeting, Lawyers Beg. ‘Covfefe,’ the President Says.  

Anyone and everyone who has sent text messages via their phone,  knows that their phone gets things mixed up,  changes wording,  and even comes up with "new" wording such as "covfefe."  Most importantly,  our friendly Commie reporter knows this.  He knows because such has happened to him.  

Well,  it happened to the President.  He wrote "covered" and his phone decided to go Bulgarian.  And the media has spent the past two days laughing at Trump for making up his own wording.  

If I was President Trump,  I would tell the media to "fefe off."  Wanna bet they would get the message?  

At any rate,  just know that Trump lawyers,  Type A personalities all,  never "begged" Trump to do much of anything.  And for the NY Times to spend two freaking days pushing a story that amounts to exactly nothing,  even if true.  is the mark of a mentally unstable agenda.  Hence,  "fake news story #209." 

Griffin called Elizabeth Hasselbeck a "C***. We now have the perfect retort:

FLASHBACK: Kathy Griffin Called Elizabeth Hasselbeck A C*** For Disrespecting Obama

BACK ATCHA  GIRL.