Anynone ever heard of the "Peter Principle ?" Well, we are thinking Obama has petered out.

NEW LOW FOR O: USATODAYGALLUP HAS OBAMA APPROVE AT 41%...

Editor's notes: there was a time not too long ago when Rasmussen Reports was scoring the lowest Obama approval totals. That is no longer the case. A number of recent polls are either in agreement with Rasmussen or score the Novice with lower totals. Included in this group are ABC, CNN and now USA/Gallup which puts Obama on a track heading for the 30 percentile category. Understand that Obama, himself, cannot win reelection with approval totals are at or near the 30% bracket.

Some of you may tire of this reminder, but we keep reminding our readers that Obama spent 3/4 of a billion dollars to win an election by 6.5% of the vote. That is with his charisma, the novelty of a first black president, and his grand ability to speak. That is with his doctrine of hope and change.

Anyone ever hear of the Peter Principle ? That is a corporate notion that people are advanced to a position in which they are "in over their heads," moved down to a lower position where they function well.

Point of post: it is looking like Obama has Petered out !!

Here is Midknight Review's list of needed reform when Patriots take back their Congress.

Editor's notes: understand that Obama is not a dictator, but he often functions as if he were. The problem? Certainly it is Obama, himself, but more than that, it is the system of presidential powers that has been allowed to increase over the years. Among the first order(s) of business with the 112th Congress (taking office on January 20th) is a review and a revision of presidential authority and power. If the reader has suggestions or criticisms, please address your thoughts to midknightmail1@aol.com. Understand that Obama has run out of time and popular appeal. He will not be able to a accomplish the takeover he had hoped. But we need to insure that the next Obama will not have the same tools available to Barack. Thank God he is/was such a novice. ---- jds.
..

1. Czars: If the appointment of "czars" is allowed to continue, the number and job description must be authorized by [at least] the Senate. As it stands, now, Obama has nearly 50 czars, folks appointed by him and without Congressional approval. As "czars," they are considered to be presidential staff and are not subject to subpoena or Congressional review at any level.

2. Executive Order: the fact that it is entirely possible, apparently and according to recent news reporting, for Obama to give amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens is evidence of a president who is out of control. We need to limit executive order and use the threat of impeachment when those rules are violated. Because of Obama, we now know that a true "dictatorship" is possible via a creative president using the powers that are allowed to him, the executive privilege given to his position, the complicity of a Marxist oriented free press and the regulatory powers of Federal agencies such as the EPA, the FCC, the FTC, and NEA (look for definitions at end of article), to name a few, under his control.

3. Presidential time in office: the two term limit for a sitting president is the result of the 22nd amendment to the Constitution -- making it much more difficult for a dictator minded individual to become just that, a long term dictator. Congress needs to review this amendment with a view of ensuring its continuation. There must never be a short-circuited legislative reversal to this amendment.

The socialist, FDR, was elected to four presidential terms - the only president in American history to serve more than two terms. With all the talk of how the American people loved this guy, it is curious that immediately after his time in office, the 22nd amendment was proposed, passed and ratified by the several states - a process that took 4 years (1947 to February of 1951) .

4. Proof of Citizenship: since the free press has abdicated it's self-appoint responsibility to fully vett presidential candidates, the qualifying issues of age and citizenship should become a matter of a mandated evidential procedure of some sort. When folks asking for proof of age or citizenship are regarded as "wacko's," it is time for Congressional mandates on the issue.

5. "Treason" needs to be defined and enforced or officially disregarded.

6. GITMO needs to be continued and modified to meet current practical and populace demands. The detention center cannot be closed. From time to time, we will capture foreign enemies, hell bent on killing Americans, who cannot be tried in a civilian court of law for reasons of national security. Understand that the Supreme Court allows for such a circumstance. We need to aggressively pursue a revitalization of the use of GITMO or a similar institution.

7. Powers of a Lame Duck Congress: under no circumstance should a lame duck congress be allowed to legislate new laws introduced after mid-term and presidential elections. If particular issues have not be formally introduced into the legislative debate well before a congressional/presidential election, they should not be allowed to be presented in the time following those elections and the last day of that congresses activities (January 19th following the specific election. The work of a lame duck Congress should be limited to the completion of legislation already introduced. If nothing else, all legislation introduced and/or passed by a lame duck congress must be reviewed by the new congress.

Tom Harken , a Marxist leaning Senator from Iowa, wants to use the lame duck Congress to pass the "card check" that would allow unions to take over factories, shops and companies without a secret ballot vote. This should not be allowed as a matter of law.

Understand that a new congress comes into power every two years -- after the so-called 'midterms' and, again, after the presidential election.

8. 5 Day review: all written legislation must be posted to the Internet for at least 5 working days (not including the weekends). If our politicians refuse to read the laws they pass, certainly the people those laws will govern should.


9. "Reconciliation" -- the rules for reconciliation need to be redrafted to insure its limited use - for budgetary matters only and to the original bill in question.


10. Filibuster Rule: without this procedure, the minority party has little to no power in the Senate. The Dems bitch about this procedure now, but loved the things when they were the minority party - as they will be again. The rule needs legislative frightening -- perhaps a requirement of additional Senatorial votes (66 or 2/3 majority) to amend the rule. The balance of power is a concept that has nearly been lost over the years --- on all levels of government. Understand that without the filibuster rule, 51 votes constitutes a super majority.

11. "Deemed to have past" -- this is a rule in the House that allows a spending bill to be declared as "deemed to have past" without the House actually voting on the bill. This needs to be taken down. It is an issue, today, because of the Dems refusal to actually pass a fiscal budget for 2010/2011. Instead, they have opted for passing a spending bill offered AS A BUDGET under the rule of "deemed to have past." No vote is taken. Most importantly, it is only a "budget" in the House. The Senate has no such provision.

12. Repeal of the Wealth Tax: a tax of 1.8 % (soon to be 25% or more) of the estimated worth of all the assests of those deemed as "wealthy." Understand that the highest tax bracket will rise from 35 % to 39% federal, 10% on average in many states, and now, a summary tax on on thier accumulated worth. Remember the good old days we talked against "double taxation ?" When exactly did that bit of rhetoric go down the drain?

13. Privacy of voter information: it is clear with the Obama crowd that if voter registration information including names and addresses was to continue as "public information," it would be used to harass the dissenting voter. This information needs to be protected iinformation for the same reason the ballot should remain a "secret" ballot.

14. Limit Federal agencies such as the EPA, NEA, FTC and the FCC, preventing them from expanding or originating federal law without said revisions being provided by the Congress of the United States. An example of regulatory excess is found in this story: http://www.thedailytimes.com/article/20100721/BIZ/100729990


15. Defeat the notion of "sanctuary cities" as illegal and punishable as a criminal offense in addition to funding rejection by the Federal Government.


16. Legislate a refusal to Federally fund private news media

17. Revisions to the July 2010 FinReg Reform law need to include opening up the SEC to "freedom of information" requests and Congressional review demands.



18. The Fed: this central bank needs 5 year (?) audits with the purvey of the Senate Finance Committee and a report written with Fed concerns in mind. NO MORE SECRECY for this private organization in charge of our national well being. It is a banking institution, not a "for profit" entity. Someone needs to let these folks know this.

Note: FCC = Federal Communications Commission; FTC = Federal Trade Commission; NEA = National Education Agency; EPA = Environmental Protection Agency.

Right now, the Dems couldn't garner enough votes to win an election in Bell, California.

Posted August 2, 2010 5:20 PM
The Swamp

by Mike Memoli of The Swamp

Republicans are back on top in Gallup's tracking survey of Congressional election preferences, reversing a two-week boomlet for the majority Democrats.

The survey, conducted July 26-August 1, shows that 48 percent of respondents say they would vote for a Republican Congressional candidate this November, while 43 percent would back the Democrat. In the previous week, Democrats led in the generic matchup 48-44 percent.

gallupgb.gif

Apparently there is GDP and then there is "real GDP" and THAT is something Obama is not talking about . . . . . at all.

Editor's notes: Here is a scary reality: according to the CIA World Factbook as recorded on Wikipedia, of the 213 nations listed in terms of their "real GDP," the United States ranks a miserable 154 with a --- once again -- real GDP of minus 2.4 % . That is correct. A few days ago, we read a headline stating that the US registered 2.4% growth in 2008 and no growth for all of 2009. We went shopping for this headline. We could not find it. And then, we stumbled onto this list.

Point of post: Two things are apparent: the whole world is NOT having the same problems as the United States and, secondly, things are far worse than we are being told.

Obama math versus reality.

Philly Begins Rolling Closures Of Firehouses To Balance Budget...

Americans swap passports; Desire to avoid tax leads some to renounce citizenship...

LAYOFFS GUT E ST LOUIS POLICE; CRIMINALS 'RUN WILD'...

First Quarter GDP of 3.7% adjusted down to 2.9%; 2Quarter = 2.4%

Scariest Jobs Chart ----------- ever

Economists worry economy won't recoup 7 million lost jobs.

Sacramento loses 8300 construction jobs - Sacramento

Seattle lost 16 percent of construction jobs since '09 -

Jul 27, 2010 ... Los Angeles has lost 15900 jobs, about 5100 more than second-place Riverside-San Bernardino

Jun 30, 2010 ... 294 out of 337 metro areas saw increased unemployment


Editor's notes: get the drift ???? Or, are you going to go with Obama's 3.5 million jobs saved ? Look, if you add 3.5 million jobs saved to 8 million jobs lost, what is the total? If you said "4.5 million," you would be dead wrong but a candidate for an Obama position. The correct answer is . . . . . . . . . . . 8 million.

Think about it; Obama wants you to think that 3.5 million saved jobs somehow offsets 8 million lost jobs. You cannot add the two together. Why ? Because "3.5 million" is already the answer to another "math problem," i.e. "if you start with 11.5 million jobs and lose 8 million, what do you have left? Answer: 3.5 million."

Understand, then, that "3.5 million jobs saved" is exactly the same as "3.5 million jobs left after gutting the economy of 8 million jobs." And, if you "add" jobs saved to jobs lost, you have not affected the total number of jobs lost . . . . . . no matter how you cut it, it is still 8 million jobs lost.

Like we told our older kids the other day -- as relates to this "jobs saved" nonsense; if you dig a hole and save the dirt, you still have a hole. You HAVE to put the dirt back into the hole before the problem of the hole is solved. Bragging about how much deeper the hole could have been accomplishes nothing at all. And that is our summary report on ObamaNomics. ---- jds.

EPA to regulate farm dust ! The 112th needs to regulate our regulatory authorities immediately If not sooner.

EPA to crack down on farm dust

By Jacqueline Sit, NEWS 9

OKLAHOMA CITY -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is considering a crackdown on farm dust, so senators have signed a letter addressing their concerns on the possible regulations.

The letter dated July 23 to the EPA states, "If approved, would establish the most stringent and unparalleled regulation of dust in our nation's history." It further states, "We respect efforts for a clean and healthy environment, but not at the expense of common sense. These identified levels will be extremely burdensome for farmers and livestock producers to attain. Whether its livestock kicking up dust, soybeans being combined on a dry day in the fall, or driving a car down the gravel road, dust is a naturally occurring event" . . . . . . .

Editor's notes: with the installment of the 112th Congress (Jan 20, 2011) , one of the issues that need to be addressed is the increasing power of the several regulatory agencies, i.e. the EPA, the FCC, the SEC, the FTC and the NEA (National Education Agency) with regard to the establishment of new Federal policy or the expansion thereof.

Understand that is the EPA that may empower "Cap and Trade" without Congressional approval. It is is the EPA that may damage farming for ever. It is the FCC and the FTC that may be used to regulate conservative talk radio into oblivion. It is the SEC that may regulate Wall Street, punishing pro-conservative companies. It is the NEA that pushes issues of faith and conscience further out the door, teaching our children AGAINST OUR WILL and forbidding full classroom disclosure !!

Add to these "tools" for dictatorship Obama's abuse of the "czar" process (a 38 billion dollar collective operating as "staff," hiding behind "executive privilege," refusing to answer questions from Congress, existing without any Congressional review possible, solely answerable to Obama); the use of "executive order" and any presidential privilege that can be utilized to usurp Federal authority without Congressional review and approval.

The Obama Administration has made it clear that the US Congress is no longer needed. THAT needs to be fixed and the business of Congressional review and repair is extensive and very complicated. This review process needs to be completed before we elect out next Marxist sympathizer.

.

Ten Most Embarrassing moments for the Libs - ten reasons why their numbers are in the tank.

It's getting to be embarrassing to be a conservative — These days it's getting increasingly embarrassing to publicly identify oneself as a conservative. It was bad enough when George Bush 43, the K Street Gang, and the neo-cons were running up spending, fighting an unnecessary war of choice in Iraq …

Editor's notes: apparently the lawyer who wrote this piece has no clients to represent and no students to teach so he decided to write political drivel to see if he could get noticed. Memeorandum sourced this headline. Memeorandum is a news portal we use for our news source gathering in addition to Drudge and My Way. Memeorandum is the most biased of the three in its headline collection, but a very good source of news,
nonetheless. This article (referenced above), however, is one that was not picked up by any other news portal we know. Why? Because it is not news. The Marxist Hack who wrote the article is a complete unknown and the article he wrote is without any sort of rhetorical merit.

Understand that no true patriot is embarrassed to be a conservative at this time in our nation's history. His attack on Sarah Palin, the number one point on his list of 10 "embarrassing" issues, could not be more misguided. Since writing lists is apparently "in," here is ours:

1. Obama's playing along with the fantasy that he was a one time editor of the Harvard Law Review.

2. Obama's assertion that if we simply tuned up our cars and kept air in our tires, we would completely offset the need from Middle Eastern oil.

3. Obama's gift of 25 CD's to Queen Elizabeth in response to the $1000 gift from the Queen.

4. Obama's plastic toy "reset button" given to the Russian President.

5. Obama's theory of "shovel ready jobs" as a jobs starter in his economic "plan."

6. Obama's claim that "if you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor."

7. Obama's almost angry assertion that the '09 Stimulus Bill would "keep unemployment from rising above 8%."

8. Joe Biden doing foreign policy in the Middle East.
my
9. Nancy Pelosi claiming that unemployment benefits are the "best jobs creator" she knows.

10. Obama's decision to return the bust of Winston Churchill to the Brits as his first official act as president --- in spite of the fact the Brits insisted he keep the bust.

Honorable Mention: the Truthers, the thugs at SEIU beating TEA Party folk, the murderers of an abortion demonstator in Michigan, the billions of dollars in damages each year because of environmental vandalism, the pathetic lack of leadership in the Gulf Oil Crisis, Louis Farrakhan's declaration that Obama was the Messiah, Al Sharpton, Maxine Waters, did we mention Joe Biden, the 400 journalists and elitists caught conspiring to influence the election, Chris Matthews "tingle up my leg" comment, CNN's comment that Obama "may be the smartest president, ever," and Obama thinking there are 58 states in the Union ("we been to 57 and have one more to go, right?").
.

Fox Cable News scores #3 OVERALL : BET #27, MSNBC #28 and CNN #33

http://static01.mediaite.com/med/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/rankers_7-21b.jpg

FoxNews to sit in Helen Thomas' seat -- How cool is this conservative victory ??!!

Fox News to move to Thomas' front-row briefing room seat — The White House Correspondents Association voted unanimously Sunday afternoon to move Fox News to the front row of the White House briefing room. — The seating change was prompted by the resignation of veteran UPI reporter Helen Thomas. . .

Editor's notes: when it is all said and done; more than a year after Obama did he best to shut down FoxNews, the network moves into the front row and now sits in Helen Thomas'seat. How thorough is the "a-- kicking" Fox gave to Obama? Now you know. In terms of symbolism, it can't get much worse [for Obama] than this. Salute to FoxNews.

Racisim running rampant within the Democrat Party . . . at least that is what Rangel and Maxine Waters want you to believe.

From POLITICO: The politically charged decisions by veteran Democratic Reps. Charles Rangel of New York and Maxine Waters of California to force public trials by the House ethics committee are raising questions about race and whether black lawmakers face more scrutiny over allegations of ethical or criminal wrongdoing than their white colleagues.

The controversy over the cases and the prospect of the first simultaneous ethics trials for multiple members in more than 30 years mark the biggest challenge for the ethics committee’s and the House’s ability to police its own members since the mid-1990s, when then-Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and other leaders from both parties found themselves hauled before the secretive panel.

The question of whether black lawmakers are now being singled out for scrutiny has been simmering throughout the 111th Congress, with the Office of Congressional Ethics a focal point of the concerns. At one point earlier this year, all eight lawmakers under formal investigation by the House ethics committee, including Rangel and Waters, were black Democrats. All those investigations originated with the OCE, which can make recommendations — but take no final actions — on such cases.

There’s a “dual standard, one for most members and one for African-Americans,” said one member of the Congressional Black Caucus, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40533.html#ixzz0vPKeN0lL

Editor's notes: what is laughable about this bit of news is the fact that it is the Dems who are subtly being accused of racism. Wouldn't you know that Rangel's and Water's first line of defense would be to charge racism. The irony, of course, is found in the reversal of fortunes for the Dems. First, it becomes the news of the day that Democrat election strategy included using charges of racism against the GOP and the conservative grassroots congress. Now that strategy has backfired. It is they who are the racists !!! To be sure, the Democrat leadership is trying to put the fire out but, tooooooooo late -- Rangel and Waters have spoken.
.