40 share
One of my blog opponents, asked this question: What is your major opposition to world peace and unity? Is
it that you have a need to feel superior over peoples of different ethnicities,
cultures?
I thought it a good idea to give my answer in this particular post:
From the Editor:
[evil] World peace in the absence of military might is
impossible, and, as such, a feckless imagination. "Unity" as you
frame it, is the loss of national sovereignty and self determination.
The doctrine of national or American Exceptionalism is grossly and intentionally misrepresented, in the Progressive, "Its not fair," camp of academics. The fact of the matter is this: no country has ever had the very beginnings its governmental system, evolve from thoughtful debate, careful planning and compromise . . . . . . . . none.
The Doctrine of National Exceptionalism has nothing to do with "we are better than all others." Rather, it is about being the very best we can be, of and within ourselves, as a nation. While there is a competitive aspect to the existential reality, it has never been about putting down others are making the same effort.
It is your side that voted in, gradeless reports at Stanford, an academic effort that failed and miserably so. In reality, this academic experiment was a put-down of those who were successful, by comparison.
The doctrine of national or American Exceptionalism is grossly and intentionally misrepresented, in the Progressive, "Its not fair," camp of academics. The fact of the matter is this: no country has ever had the very beginnings its governmental system, evolve from thoughtful debate, careful planning and compromise . . . . . . . . none.
The Doctrine of National Exceptionalism has nothing to do with "we are better than all others." Rather, it is about being the very best we can be, of and within ourselves, as a nation. While there is a competitive aspect to the existential reality, it has never been about putting down others are making the same effort.
It is your side that voted in, gradeless reports at Stanford, an academic effort that failed and miserably so. In reality, this academic experiment was a put-down of those who were successful, by comparison.
It is your side that gives trophies to all, and awards even
the most minimal of effort. Again, a failed social experiment that punished
those who were and are successful in their given endeavor.
And it is your side of the aisle that is surrendering our
place, as THE balance of power in an evil world, all out of an idiotic sense of
faux fairness and perennial pandering to those who hate America without good
reason.
More than this, your question assumes a white bias on my part despite the fact that it is your side that invented slavery and ethnic bias. I and millions of folks I represent, do not despise other ethnicities; we oppose the blatant and partisan stupidity of any political move that seeks to divest this nation of its successfully crafted foundations. It is not blacks or Hispanics we “hate,’ it is collectivists and angry social reformers we cannot bear.
And more questions?
More than this, your question assumes a white bias on my part despite the fact that it is your side that invented slavery and ethnic bias. I and millions of folks I represent, do not despise other ethnicities; we oppose the blatant and partisan stupidity of any political move that seeks to divest this nation of its successfully crafted foundations. It is not blacks or Hispanics we “hate,’ it is collectivists and angry social reformers we cannot bear.
And more questions?
