Democrats take in $220 million more than the GOP. So who needs to be transparent ??

664 million to 442 million.

What's this? Well, it is the total funding raised, to date, for each of the political parties. Which is the winner? The Dems of course by a margin of $220 million big ones. These numbers come from the left leaning "non-partisan" site known as "OpenSecrets.org." Midknight Review carried this blog on our blogroll, at one time. But, we took the site down from our recommended reading due to its left leaning editorial bias, something the site's owner pretends to avoid. Still, it is a huge site for the collection of information. Understand that the "left leaning" thingy is not the problem. It is the pretense to be otherwise.

We present the above numbers for our post but without the ability at this writing to verify these totals. Understand that if these totals are true, the Democrats are the worst of hypocrites, pretending to be at a disadvantage because of the Citizens United vs Federal Elections Commission.

What is not factored into this equation are the monies raised by the individual candidates and that sum can be substantial. For example, Obama raised $770 million in his 2008 campaign for president. Compare that total to the Democrat total, above. In the current election cycle, Sharron Angle has raised a national record high for midterm campaigning of 14 million dollars and Michelle Bachmann has set a similar state record ffund rasiing, sharron angle, Michelle Bachmann, opensecrets, left leaning, or Minnesota of 5 million.

A related article can be found here: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-do-democrats-promote-campaign-finance-reform/ referencing OpenSecrets.org and its methodology as to data collection and management.

Sharron Angle believes there are domestic enemies. Some of these enemies are using the media to take her down

Sharron Angle twice refuses to disavow claim that there are “domestic enemies” in Congress — In an interview with a conservative talk show host yesterday, Sharron Angle was given two clear chances to disavow the claim that there are “domestic enemies” within Congress, an assertion she previously expressed unequivocal agreement with. . . . .

Editor's notes: Sooooooo, this is wrong ??? If the Congressional representative is not working to strengthen states rights per the 10th Amendment; if he is willing to assist others in circumventing Congressional review; if she moves to place restrictions on free political speech in violation of the Constitution; if he is willing to violate the gun rights of the American citizen; if one is willing to work against the will of the people, putting an individual agenda before that of the free people of the United States; if he moves to effect the support of foreign powers without Congressional review using Federal funds; if she is willing to support Marxist/Collectivist transformation that runs counter to the tenets of the Constitution -- then "yes," there are those who are domestic enemies within Congress.

Understand that each and every member of Congress has taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Here is what they have sworn to uphold:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

Sharron Angle is not the wacko, here. It is those who think that taking a "generic" stand against domestic enemies of the United States who are more than misguided. Any elected official who willingly supports and defends philosophies and powers that are about the destruction of the United States of America are enemies of the State.
.