Yesterday, Obama admitted that we have no strategy for dealing with ISIS in Syria (where it is based) and, now, Obama exposes his Muslim sympathies with a refusal to name radical Islam as a domestic threat.

46 share

40 is our goal

<<<<  “Domestic extremist violence continues to be unpredictable and, at times, severe,” the report states,  yet radical Islam is not a domestic threat.  And you think we are safe under this Administration???????? 
_____________
Update:  two days ago,  Josh Earnst told reporters that Obama does have a comprehensive strategy for Iraq.  This was followed by a presser in which Obama told us he has "no strategy for Syria."  Obviously,  you cannot have a strategy for ISIS Iraq without a strategy for ISIS Syria  . . . .  another rather boorish lie told by an Administration bungling its way to the final days of its remaining two years in office.  
______________

The FBI’s most recent national threat assessment for domestic terrorism makes no reference to Islamist terror threats, despite last year’s Boston Marathon bombing and the 2009 Fort Hood shooting—both carried out by radical Muslim Americans.

Instead, the internal FBI intelligence report concluded in its 2013 assessment published this month that the threat to U.S. internal security from extremists is limited to attacks and activities by eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam.

They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with “sovereign citizen” nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.

“Domestic extremist violence continues to be unpredictable and, at times, severe,” the report states.