A tutorial on the New Utopian Society of Academic America - as Marxist as it gets, as insanely inadequate as its know-nothing designers care to dream.

47 share

<<<  Having a few communist type hippies sleeping around the house was "doable."  But, now,  the few are many,  they have political power,  and they want us all to live in cities such as this,  returning "the land" to Mother Nature.  

Before reading the following,  you should know (1) that the NSF is funded by tax dollars.  “We, the people,”  paid for this Utopian nonsense.  (2)  Utopian Science (aka Environmentalist Junk Science) is being used to redistribute wealth through aggressive/regressive taxation,  taking money earned by hard working Americans (not just from the rich) and assessed property evaluations. (3) The Wisconsin-Madison utopian scenario is one in which the world is taken over by the know-nothing X generation and its offspring,  returning modern day civilization to the stone age,  where man,  apparently,  lived in harmony with other nomad populations,  stopped building houses out of brick, motar,wood, and whatever,  and returned to tents, caves and sleeping under the stars  ---   you know,  back to a time when the blind,  the toothless,  the hard of hearing,  the crippled, and the under-educated  all died early deaths because they could not compete. 

Did I say “compete?!”  Indeed,  “competition” is hated by the hippie communal population,  but it will be the death of this nonsensical idea,  if it ever were to “get off the ground.”  Such is the innately existential problem with communalism, whether that be the Communism of the past or the Marxist inspired Progressive/socialism of the present.  There is no place for the "competitor,"  in a thorough-going,  Marxist inspired,  socialist, society.  

(4)     Further,  you should know that “sustainability” is fast becoming the most important concept in the world of redistribution.  If land use is not deemed “sustainable usage,”  someday,  in the not-too-distant future,  it can be taken from its rightful owners,  those who paid the taxes and purchased the property,  and given to the larger community.  Key to “sustainability” under Utopian Rule,  is the notion of the “greater good.”  Take a rural piece of  property, 500 acres in size,  for example, and a family of four living on that acreage.  That family has worked hard,  and now,  own their dream world  . . . . . . . . . .  but the property benefits only that family of four.   There is a time,  coming,  in which the local or state government may take that property,  under the rules of eminent domain, and give it (or sell it) to a manufacturing entity,  or a larger, farming complex, thus benefiting the larger community.  When the article (or the website,  if you should go there) speaks of “forcibly”  taking property from the wealthy, it envisions the radicalized use of eminent domain laws,  and,  all property owned by the comparative few,  “rich” or not.  “The rich,” under Utopian Rule, are individual property owners who are not producing for the common good. 

(5)     "Community building and sustainability,"  under Utopian Rule,  are key to the new society of “peace and love”  and the very opposite to all that this great nation,  has stood for, during its centuries-old existence.  The rub,  in all this,  is the fact that the United States of America is under attack by Academic, Theoretic,  America,  and the taxpayer is funding this imagined take-over.        

Here is an except from the article in question:  

The National Science Foundation (NSF) gave nearly $5 million to the University of Wisconsin-Madison to create scenarios based on America’s actions on climate change, including a utopian future where everyone rides a bike and courts forcibly take property from the wealthy.

The government has awarded $4,911,961 for the project, which is slated to run until March 2016 and for which the school has created a website suggesting different possibilities of what Yahara, a Wisconsin watershed, will be like in 2070.

In the scenario where Americans “shift our values,” people live in hippie-like communes after “youth culture” convinces the world to give up their cars and eat vegetarian.

“By the 2020s, the world seemed at the edge of environmental and political collapse,” the scenario says. “Despite this predicament, youth culture becomes empowered to shift the course of humanity. Disenchanted with the country’s highly consumptive culture, the younger generations embrace community building and sustainability and work together through grassroots action to get their voices heard.”

The youth bring about the “Great Transition” in the 2040s, establishing a “new normal” where “connectivity, community, and environmental sustainability pervade policy and cultural decisions.”

The protagonist of the story is Rosa, a “community organizer” for a United Nations youth group “Badgers for Our Future,” who presides over the only holiday celebrated in the community  . . . . .  you will want to read the full news article at the Free Beacon.